kryo Options

[*steve330*]

He's probably not @ a computer? Has he been active since this thread has been, other than maybe for a few minutes?

[Spirited Away]

Um, I don't think anyone has claim to know how Kryo feels about these things yet. At least, I don't see it. I just saw that James is saying what he thought Kryo did wrong and what he thought staff did wrong. Perfect two way street, imho.

Yea... give him some time to answer.

[*tripvertigo*]

The way i see it, kryo is like gandhi. the veterens have a big issue with the way cB is right now. Kryo is speaking out through civil disobedience. Sort of.

I applaud you, sir. Well done.

[*kryogenix*]

Sorry for my lack of participation, been too busy to give a well planned response. I will say that I encourage community participation as well, in order to show the staff that I'm not the only one who feels this way.

[*tripvertigo*]

i've been participating here and there.

[demolished]

I'm supporting both. I do respect kyro's past and what he had done for the community other than bashing. He has a story to tell. I like to hear him first.

[*MyMichelle*]

I liked his thread in relationships about the shiny Pidgey. ^_^"

[*steve330*]

Yeah man wtf was that girl thinking... SHINY!!!

[Simba]

Will wait.

[*kryogenix*]

Sorry, was in NYC, driving in Chinatown is a pain in the ass, lots of traffic, missed the giant explosion by a few mins, etc.

Ok, let's take this one step at a time.

What was I suspended for last?

[demolished]

LOL. No one wants to deal with this thread.

[Spirited Away]

Tee hee. What happened? He was suspended for some reason right?

[*kryogenix*]

Killing it with silence, eh?

[heyyfrankie]

Killing it with silence, eh?

I don't like the way cB is right now that much either...
but i do feel that there are better ways improve the community rather than being a jerk at time. :/

[*kryogenix*]

Tee hee. What happened? He was suspended for some reason right?

Yeah, I want to know the "official" reason this time. The last time, they kept changing it.

So mods, why was I suspended and warned recently?

[*kryogenix*]

Same difference.

Now that we're at the point of the matter, I've already confirmed with micron that no spoilers were actually posted. What I posted was mere speculation, which has gone unwarned when posted by other people. Obviously we know Snape did not kill Hermoine. We know that Harry did not lose his powers to save his friends. So why did you guys insist that I posted spoilers?

[*tripvertigo*]

Because you were trying to be an asshole. We had no idea that that isn't what happened. You intended to be misleading. You wanted people to believe that they were spoilers. You wanted to ruin harry potter. You obnoxiously posted plausible endings to Harry Potter after it was made aware that the book was released on the internet. Now own up to it. Call me a nazi all you want, but you knew what you were doing.

Sorry, but that's hardly a warnable offense.

Warned and muted for trying to ruin Harry Potter?

I wasnt aware that there was a rule against that. You can't just make up rules as you guys go along.

[*kryogenix*]

And I did not break any rules and therefore deserved no punishment. Yet again, you guys made assumptions and acted prematurely and excessively. I would think you would have learned by now.

Since posting plausible endings is an offense, would you mind warning those who posted speculation on the book?

[*kryogenix*]

Ok, how could I stop posting spoilers when I didn't post any spoilers in the first place? And I seem to recall a group of mods posting something that caused disruption to the website around April 1...

Sure, I agree that personal judgment should be used when modding a forum. But when you're wrong, you're wrong. It seems that the mods are claiming infallibility when using "personal judgment" and they're eschewing being held accountable as a result.

[*kryogenix*]

Once again, being misleading is not an offense. Otherwise a lot of topics in the lounge would have to be closed. LMAO talk about double standards! So what you're saying is, the majority decides whether something is acceptable or not? Please.

[heyyfrankie]

no matter how valid or not valid you think the reason for being warned (spoilers) is...you were asked to stop repeatedly. And you didn't.

and that's just a blatant disrespect towards the staff.

[*kryogenix*]

no matter how valid or not valid you think the reason for being warned (spoilers) is...you were asked to stop repeatedly. And you didn't.

and that's just a blatant disrespect towards the staff.

The problem was I didn't post any spoilers.

.........................................................I don't think that answered my question.

I don't think your question is relevant.

lol here comes the cavalry

4 Members: SayBloodyMary, Arjuna Capulong, brownsugar, ventriloquist

[heyyfrankie]

The problem was I didn't post any spoilers.

though that may be true, i'm not saying yes or no, you were asked/told/wanred to stop.

I mean, you gotta pick your battles around here and when you consider your own actions around here lately, you knew that you were pushing the staff's (suzzette's) buttons.

[*ersatz*]

No one knew they weren't spoilers at the time, and the posting disability was a preventative measure. If you didn't want your post disabled, you could have just stopped. Everyone knew the book was posted on the internet and since it was never clarified by yourself when you were posting them that they were indeed "speculation" and not actual spoilers, no one could have known the truth. In case they were spoilers, you were stopped.

If you explained yourself as much as you expect the mods to explain themselves, there wouldn't be a problem.

[*kryogenix*]

My question is completely relevant. If you want to get anything solved, stop playing around and cut to the chase. I am going to treat you with respect, I deserve the same respect back.

For the sake of argument, let's say I did. How is that wrong? How many times do people post misleading topic titles? How is it different from your April Fool's joke (which was a horrible abuse, but first things first, let's get this problem solved before tackling that)

No one knew they weren't spoilers at the time, and the posting disability was a preventative measure. If you didn't want your post disabled, you could have just stopped. Everyone knew the book was posted on the internet and since it was never clarified by yourself when you were posting them that they were indeed "speculation" and not actual spoilers, no one could have known the truth. In case they were spoilers, you were stopped.

If you explained yourself as much as you expect the mods to explain themselves, there wouldn't be a problem.

LOL no. The mods were wrong. I'd like them to admit they were wrong now and apologize. Why should I stop if I didn't do anything wrong?

The mods are keeping an eye on the people, but who's keeping an eye on the mods. What I am doing is keeping them honest. I am doing nothing wrong but it seems the problem the mods have is me bringing their abuses to light. Too bad they can't close this topic.