kryo Options

[micron]

so kryo (james) wants to speak but complained to me that his topics are always being closed... so lets hear him out. also staff, why dont you openly discuss here about the problems kryo is causing. maybe by having the opposing views come together like this we'll be able to find a middle ground.

if you wish to participate, keep in mind that communication is a two way street. when two opposing views clash, it doesnt neccessarily mean one is entirely right and the other entirely wrong. try to be open minded, consider the opposing view(s), be honest, admit to wrongdoings when wrong, and hopefully together we'll be able to get to the bottom of this.

please keep away from personal attacks. if this topic becomes one big staff bashing thread, its going to be closed. a little tact never hurts, so lets try use this as an opportunity to learn from and understand each another.

[*SayBloodyMary*]

Yes, Trish. Not being illterate, I do in fact understand the purpose of the thread. I just don't consider it particularly constructive.

As far as a and b go.

A: Yes, again, not being completely stupid, I think we're aware that James wants n apology. However, that doesn't oblige anyone to give him one if they don't feel they were in the wrong. Discussion about that is pointless unless either party actually means the apology, rather than being pressured into it for the sake of things, as I have already said.

B: Unless one finds a magic potion to make everyone's personal judgement identical, which seems unlikely to occur in the immediate future, then things like this happening is inevitable. Sorry.

---

Oh, and I was just offering my speculation (see, individuals here) as to the difference. The key word in my post was 'discernably.' And I don't think James is being discriminated against. Although I would like to point out that if someone sees what they perceive to be rule breaking, and act on it, that doesn't constitute discrimination, even if it happens to be one member repeatedly. If the rules leave too much room for such discrepency, then that is a seperate issue, but shoudln't be confused with bias. Again, however, what is past is past, and what would be more constructive would be to reevaluate the system, rather than retredding old ground.