Creation or Evolution?, Which do you believe in? Options

[Peanups]

Here's more questions for evolutionists,
yeah, I'm to lazy to write them all out,, sorry.

CLICK

[brooklyneast05]

Is that serioiusly your only reply??? u people really are afraid......wow....I'm still trying to figure out how what you guys believe is true.....you're not providing us with any kind of evidence to back up what you're saying. You're just tossing out things that you can't even prove yourself.

and ur proof of creation is where?

[Peanups]

^

Just answer this please,

there is ABSOLUTELY no fossil evidence that proves evolution.
PLEASE if you know of one, please post it up,

What about the discoveries of "missing links?"

-piltdown man
This discovery by Charles Dawson in 1912 was said to be evidence of a half-million-year-old ape-man. However, in 1953 it was found out that Piltdown Man was a fake. When the evidence was examined more carefully, scientist discovered that it had been altered to give the appearance of age when actually the jawbone was that of an orangutan.

-nebraska man
In 1922 a tooth was found on a farm in Nebraska. Initially it was said to be a tooth of a 1 million year old ape-man. Later, geologist Harold Cook found another tooth, similar to the first one, attached to a skull, which was found to belong to a rare pig.

-peking man
The evidence for Peking Man has disappeared since 1941. There are serious problems with believing that Peking Man was an ape-man becausse he died by a blow from a sharp object, which is highly unlikely cause of death for a pre-human.

-java man
"This alleged missing link was discovered by Eugene Dubois's expedition in 1891 along the SOlo River in Java (now Indonesia). The fossil evidence for Java Man indication to some scientists that it lived 500,000 years ago.. However, a closer look at the initial dating process and skull cap and femur bones suggest that it is either a human or ape buy not both.

-lucy
In 1974 while in Ethiopia, Donald Johanson discovered the remains of an animal that allegedly lived more than 3 million years ago. It is still debated whether Lucy is a small human or a chimpanzee.

-ramapithecus
In 1932 several teeth and jawbones were found in India. These were thought to belong to an early ape-man dating from about 14-million years ago. However, anthropologists have since discovered that they belong to an ape.

-neanderthal man
Neanderthal Man was thought to be the remains of an early ape-man. But recent studies have provided convincing evidence that he was a hunched man who suffered from a vitamin D deficiency."

-All information is from a quoted from TruthQuest Living Loud Defending Your Faith

everyone seems to be avoiding it.

[brooklyneast05]

i think i'm missing something maybe, i don't know, correct me
ur talking about some fossils that were thought to be one thing and then turned out to be wrong. so there's been at least 7 mistakes.(assuming ur source is accurate) ok?


sorry if i fail to find TruthQuest Living Loud Defending Your Faith a really reliable source. as katt already said, what makes u think this is accurate information, it's about defending faith

[Wlfgrl7777]

i think i'm missing something maybe, i don't know, correct me
ur talking about some fossils that were thought to be one thing and then turned out to be wrong. so there's been at least 7 mistakes.(assuming ur source is accurate) ok?
sorry if i fail to find TruthQuest Living Loud Defending Your Faith a really reliable source. as katt already said, what makes u think this is accurate information, it's about defending faith

it's not "some fossil" it's the missing link. And, there is no proof that is exists. Peanups was just pointing out the flaw in the theory of evolution, and that is, the missing link.

[Peanups]

fine I'll find another website with the same information on it.
even if it has to deal with something you don't consider accurate doesn't mean that everything in it is inaccurate.

just like public school science books.
even if it has to deal with something I don't consider accurate doesn't mean that everything in it is inaccurate.

Another Hoax

Yes, some of these models of missing links still exsist in our public school books even after they have been proven false.

[Wlfgrl7777]

and ur proof of creation is where?

you want proof of creation? read this if ur really interested on winning this....

http://www.allaboutcreation.org/creation-evidence.htm

this one's really good too

http://www.drdino.com/articles.php?spec=105

[brooklyneast05]

you want proof of creation?

yea i do
and a link to a website that repeats information we've already been over isn't doing it for me

[NoSex]

I think the problem is we're trying to talk to morons.

[xKatt]

^ that misquote Darwin.

[synthase]

Evolution. Listen to Darwin!

[sadolakced acid]

god is dead.

my info is from f**k jesus you motherf**kers.

why don't you all go out and read it? i swear it's a legit source.

[ClaudelGFX]

Creation is Evolution.

[RAWRstephishere]

I say creation.

But neither of them actually has any proof.

[Jennifer]

IMO, Evolution.

The way I see it there are many sides.
But to pick one, evolution is the closest.

But then again, with creation COMES evolution.

There isn't perfect proof to establish one or the other, so really it all comes down to belief.