Log In · Register

 

Debate Rules

Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.

Debate.

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Which US constitutional amendment is important?, and why?
Aesirus
post Mar 3 2005, 09:00 PM
Post #26


Senior Member
***

Group: Member
Posts: 73
Joined: Mar 2005
Member No: 108,896



QUOTE(kryogenix @ Mar 3 2005, 6:25 PM)
for the sake of debate, i disagree with everyone who did not select either the first or second. without the first or second amendment, you can't have any of the other amendments.
*


I disagree. The ninth and tenth amendments cover all the rest. Especially the tenth amendment. A strict interpretation of the tenth amendment could, by itself, preserve the rule of law, since the government would only be allowed to do things that are written in the Constitution, and extralegal spending operations and violations of civil liberties would be not allowed.
 
*mipadi*
post Jun 2 2005, 10:49 AM
Post #27





Guest






QUOTE(Aesirus @ Mar 3 2005, 6:13 PM)
The 10th Amendment, because all of our rights ultimately derive from it. Any other amendment only protects one specific right. The 10th amendment protects all of our rights.

If only the government didn't ignore it so much...
*

The fact that all rights not delegated to the federal government are rights of the states is the most important...?
 
b0st0ngrl
post Jun 2 2005, 10:56 AM
Post #28


No Day But Today.
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,405
Joined: Feb 2005
Member No: 99,184



The 4th I guess because without it, the government could spy on us, like in the book 1984. I think that's the book I'm thinking about..
 
Spirited Away
post Jun 2 2005, 01:07 PM
Post #29


Quand j'étais jeune...
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 6,826
Joined: Jan 2004
Member No: 1,272



QUOTE(mipadi @ Jun 2 2005, 10:49 AM)
The fact that all rights not delegated to the federal government are rights of the states is the most important...?
*


Yes.

If the Constitution didn't grant a power to the Fed Government, it cannot have it. This means that there is a restriction in gaining more power, prevent a powerful central government, something that the Founding Fathers fear. James Madisons said this means there wouldn't be a NATIONAL constitution/government, just a FEDERAL one. There is a difference. Imagine that the US Government has no limitations set, no restraints as to what powers it can/cannot have...
 
*CrackedRearView*
post Jun 2 2005, 03:39 PM
Post #30





Guest






Well, let's disqualify the First, Second, Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth, and see where it goes from there...

(You already know it'll move to women's suffrage, etc etc.)

This topic isn't really debate-worthy. Move it to the homework forum.
 
ryfitaDF
post Jun 5 2005, 07:01 PM
Post #31


LunchboxXx
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,789
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,810



*dave chapelle voice* 1 2 3 4 Fiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiif! hehe
 
sammi rules you
post Jun 5 2005, 08:52 PM
Post #32


WWMD?! - i am from the age of BM 2
*******

Group: Member
Posts: 5,308
Joined: Mar 2004
Member No: 8,848



QUOTE(CrackedRearView @ Jun 2 2005, 2:39 PM)
Well, let's disqualify the First, Second, Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth, and see where it goes from there...

(You already know it'll move to women's suffrage, etc etc.)

This topic isn't really debate-worthy.  Move it to the homework forum.
*


tried that, it got moved back..
 

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: