old or new underoath?? |
 Dec 20 2004, 06:25 PM
Post
#1
|
|
 mosh.  Group: Member Posts: 1,841 Joined: Dec 2004 Member No: 73,114  |
there seems to be alot of controversy about the "new" underoath or the "old" underoath..
what is you guys' pick? old or new? |
|
|
|
 |
Replies
(1 - 22)
| *tweeak* |
Dec 20 2004, 06:46 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Guest |
im not terribly fond of them at all
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 20 2004, 06:47 PM
Post
#3
|
|
 Can't have the hand without the cock. Group: Member Posts: 2,481 Joined: Sep 2004 Member No: 50,622 |
I have the last two cds, but not the two before that.
So IDK. |
|
|
|
|
Dec 20 2004, 06:51 PM
Post
#4
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 360 Joined: Nov 2004 Member No: 63,174 |
ehh ill go with Parkway Drive, Across Five Aprils and Skycamefalling over underoath anyday. Underoath is way too overrated and way to light for me.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 20 2004, 08:00 PM
Post
#5
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 1,688 Joined: Apr 2004 Member No: 11,733 |
im fine with both the old and new underoath.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 20 2004, 08:43 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
mosh. Group: Member Posts: 1,841 Joined: Dec 2004 Member No: 73,114 |
yeah me too.. but it seems like people classify the old underoath and the new underoath as two separate bands.. haha.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 20 2004, 08:53 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 360 Joined: Nov 2004 Member No: 63,174 |
QUOTE(D1SMANTLED @ Dec 20 2004, 8:43 PM) yeah me too.. but it seems like people classify the old underoath and the new underoath as two separate bands.. haha. That would be due to the fact that Underoath went thorugh 2 different member changes, causing it to basically become a new band. Also when your frontman leaves the band truly changes. |
|
|
|
|
Dec 20 2004, 09:10 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
mosh. Group: Member Posts: 1,841 Joined: Dec 2004 Member No: 73,114 |
yeah.. i suppose..
but the voice of aaron (the drummer) and spencer (the new guy) go soo much better together. |
|
|
|
|
Dec 20 2004, 09:23 PM
Post
#9
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 2,137 Joined: Nov 2004 Member No: 62,193 |
i like both
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 20 2004, 09:33 PM
Post
#10
|
|
 my <3 is in Ohio Group: Member Posts: 899 Joined: Jul 2004 Member No: 27,599 |
im fond of both
|
|
|
|
| *Kathleen* |
Jan 12 2005, 05:47 PM
Post
#11
|
|
Guest |
I actually like both, even though they are close to extremes in difference. (Whoa. I didn't even see this topic before. Haha.)
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 12 2005, 05:49 PM
Post
#12
|
|
 WWMD?! - i am from the age of BM 2 Group: Member Posts: 5,308 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 8,848 |
i think i like the new better.
yes i'm a big huge poser, blahblah.. |
|
|
|
|
Jan 12 2005, 06:47 PM
Post
#13
|
|
 oh sweet pestilence Group: Member Posts: 2,251 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 22,876 |
I like the "new" Underoath better. You're right about the drummers voice & the new guys voice sounds better together.
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 12 2005, 07:04 PM
Post
#14
|
|
 Oh you'd be surprised Group: Member Posts: 2,406 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 7,886 |
i've never heard of their music. i probably did but i dont notice probably lol
|
|
|
|
| *Kathleen* |
Jan 12 2005, 07:21 PM
Post
#15
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE i've never heard of their music. i probably did but i dont notice probably lol I don't think they're considered quite mainstream yet.  You probably didn't.
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 12 2005, 08:20 PM
Post
#16
|
|
 HOY!!!!! Group: Member Posts: 268 Joined: Oct 2004 Member No: 55,098 |
whats the controversy?
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 12 2005, 08:24 PM
Post
#17
|
|
|
mosh. Group: Member Posts: 1,841 Joined: Dec 2004 Member No: 73,114 |
um.. the "old" underoath changed their frontman and singer..
and the "new" underoath comes off as more... poppy i guess. its making underoath fanatics mad. |
|
|
|
|
Jan 12 2005, 10:13 PM
Post
#18
|
|
 skills to pay the bills... Group: Member Posts: 417 Joined: Sep 2004 Member No: 49,204 |
I love their new stuff. They are on my xanga right now.
|
|
|
|
| *Kathleen* |
Jan 13 2005, 06:25 PM
Post
#19
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE and the "new" underoath comes off as more... poppy i guess. its making underoath fanatics mad. I wouldn't say poppy...they're just like...metal core now...opposed to them being a different type of metal before. |
|
|
|
|
Jan 13 2005, 06:35 PM
Post
#20
|
|
|
mosh. Group: Member Posts: 1,841 Joined: Dec 2004 Member No: 73,114 |
QUOTE(Kathleen @ Jan 13 2005, 6:25 PM) I wouldn't say poppy...they're just like...metal core now...opposed to them being a different type of metal before.  oh.,.. but i meant that if you compare old underoath by new underoath, new underoath is a little less metal and a tad bit poppier. 
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 13 2005, 08:43 PM
Post
#21
|
|
 je suis une noix de coco <33 Group: Member Posts: 1,242 Joined: Nov 2004 Member No: 62,768 |
i like the old better
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 14 2005, 01:40 AM
Post
#22
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 360 Joined: Nov 2004 Member No: 63,174 |
Underoath is pure hardcore... Metal Core are bands like Skycamefalling and Theycameburning.
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 14 2005, 01:54 AM
Post
#23
|
|
|
oh sweet pestilence Group: Member Posts: 2,251 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 22,876 |
I didn't know there was a difference between hardcore & metal core
|
|
|
|
 |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: