cB athority complex Options

[razbus]

Hm... you know, it seems like some people take createblog a little to seriously. Some of the Mods and staff use their privaleges to settle personal disputes. For example: a moderator who rejects a skin from someone, just because they have a beef with them.... that's abusing the privalege. Removing someones avatar and signature, just to piss them off..... that's f**king wrong. But you know, that happens here.

You know who you are. And you think you're god, but you're not. You think that because you hold some position of "authority", that makes you better than someone? Pft. Imature.

And you know, chances are that my sig will be removed (again), my avatar gone, or i will even be banned from the site by this person for making this post. But, i said what i needed to say, and doing so will only prove my point.

- cheers.

[*[2]Nekked*]

first of all, your avatar was member bashing and thats obviously against the rules, so it was removed.

if i was still modded, i would have removed your signature all the same, even if the "dispute" had nothing to do with me personally.


second: you've been known to "borrow" your graphics from other people. we dont tolerate that here at createblog, so SORRY if the mods are taking any precautions to your skins. also.. sometimes they arent good enough. sorry but thats the truth.


edti://

and moderators dont have the ability to ban people, only suspend. which he CAN do because youve already been warned once for jocking. the second warning warrants a suspension.

[*Weird addiction*]

well i never noticed,i think the mods here r responsible and r not babies to do things like that...someone correct me if im wrong

[razbus]

Nekked,Nov 11 2004, 11:52 AM] first of all, your avatar was member bashing and thats obviously against the rules, so it was removed.

if i was still modded, i would have removed your signature all the same, even if the "dispute" had nothing to do with me personally.


second: you've been known to "borrow" your graphics from other people. we dont tolerate that here at createblog, so SORRY if the mods are taking any precautions to your skins. also.. sometimes they arent good enough. sorry but thats the truth.

Okay, i agree. That was bashing, and i shall remove the sig myself. BUT my avatar only said my name and was not bashing in anyway. How do you explain someone deleting that?

Secondly, am i to be punished forever for something that i once did?

As for my skins not being good enough, yes you are right. Sometimes they are not up to par. But i have seen skins far less than great submitted, while mine fall into a black hole somewhere.

edti://

and moderators dont have the ability to ban people, only suspend. which he CAN do because youve already been warned once for jocking. the second warning warrants a suspension.

I have not since jocked. Waccoon acused me of it twice, but i can prove that they werent "jocked".

[*[2]Nekked*]

Okay, i agree. That was bashing, and i shall remove the sig myself. BUT my avatar only said my name and was not bashing in anyway. How do you explain someone deleting that?

Secondly, am i to be punished forever for something that i once did?

As for my skins not being good enough, yes you are right. Sometimes they are not up to par. But i have seen skins far less than great submitted, while mine fall into a black hole somewhere.

different mods have different standards. if one that had particularly high standards checked your skin, they might have deleted it.


and it doesnt matter WHEN you jocked the skin. you've been warned once. a second warning warrants a post suspension. a third warning comes with a site suspension.

[lookitskim]

Okay, i agree. That was bashing, and i shall remove the sig myself. BUT my avatar only said my name and was not bashing in anyway. How do you explain someone deleting that?

Secondly, am i to be punished forever for something that i once did? 

As for my skins not being good enough, yes you are right. Sometimes they are not up to par. But i have seen skins far less than great submitted, while mine fall into a black hole somewhere.




I have not since jocked. Waccoon acused me of it twice, but i can prove that they werent "jocked".

Didn't u jock Roxanne's skin and put it on your personal site?

can u explain this?
this is your site
http://www.xanga.com/x_design

This is cB's old site
http://xangan.com/

Look familiar?

Anyways.. u were warned once... and this is your second offense.. so a moderator can suspend you.

mods can not BAN you.. only suspend.

[queen]

your "imagination" skin i consider to be joqqed ;x you didn't create that flash, yet you didn't give any credit. edit: oh, i thought it was accepted ;X

[waccoon]

Your fault, bud.
Forced mod preview for a week.

[Chaos13]

bad bad bad boy!! jocking is bad! yes i have jocked long ago becuse i didn't know any better. But i have learned my lesson. I make my own stuff. You should too! well i'm watching white chiks and have nothing else to say.

[razbus]

You all keep talking about my "second offense"....

WHAT SECOND OFFENSE??? I have not jocked since then!
The imagination flash that i used was free-source flash. And the owner did not require credit for commercial uses. That's not jocking.

When did i jock roxanne's crap? I don't know what you're talking about.

[razbus]

Once again my avatar was removed. Why? It was not bashing. How is this against the rules?

[happygoluckyng]

umm....*clicks the back button on screen*

[x emo screamo x]

*whispers*
you spelt 'authority' wrong.
Unless you spell it 'athority'
anywho...
ditto to what [2] nekked said.
&& jocking is bad. =x

[*krnxswat*]

Duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuudeee.

Learn how to spell.

[royalfreshness]

I think the mods are doing good, tyvm.

[*tweeak*]

but your sig was innappropriate. your making something that relates back to a personal grudge so apparently is just as bad as someone rejecting a skin (well, almost)

[waccoon]

So apparently, razbus wants to hack my ftp.

[lylbabyblooz]

i wonder who are some of the mods that do that.

[*tweeak*]

^its not "some of the mods" this is a particular conflict thats being referred to

[*tweeak*]

Once again my avatar was removed. Why? It was not bashing. How is this against the rules?

because it was in direct relation with the sig, which was undoubtedly member bashing

[NatiMarie]

-____-

*sigh*
If you have a beef with someone, no need to place them on your siggie and stuff. That's very immature. Just ignore them. If they're not significant in your life whatsoever, no need to put them in your siggie.
;]

[sunissed14127]

yea it was bashing other people.....Cb doesnt tolerate that. and you should know that u shouldnt steal graphics from people.....so of course CB doesnt tolerate that either.....and the mods dont abuse the privilage...they use it when they need to.so quit bashing the mods...they are here to make CB a better place to be and they doo a good job...kepp up the good work mods!

[juliar]

KAY.
This is now becoming a bashing thread. -closed-

[xquizit]

I have something to say. You have jocked my Individuality layout and you know it... you used it for your X-Designs forums in the past. I even posted you in my jockers list and contacted you about it. You never responded but you did remove the jocked image.

Secondly, I know for a fact that your "Endeffect" skin was jocked from endeffect.com. Your "Fragile Hearted" skin was also jocked or used with "permission" but that was after someone pointed out that it looked familiar. "Imagination" of course, was jocked. "Kumrads"... jocked.

Perhaps your skins haven't been being accepted because of your prolific history of jocking, did you consider that before accussing us of being unfair and unjust?

And why the heck are you even acting like you don't know why your sig and avatar were removed? Don't play innocent. You know member bashing is against the rules here.

Why are you trying to make us look like the bad guys here when we're only doing our jobs?

By the way, I, myself, don't have an authority complex. I just moderate these forums as it is my duty to do so.

Alright, now topic closed.