Log In · Register

 

Resource Center Links

This Month's Contests | Hosts Looking for Hostees | Hostees looking for Hosts | BigBookofResources

Submission Guidelines

Glisten, almost done...
Mikeplyts
post Dec 23 2009, 05:00 PM
Post #1


Mel Blanc was allergic to carrots.
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 6,371
Joined: Aug 2008
Member No: 676,291



Ok, so I've ultimately decided what layout I want to use for my website redesign. It's a grungy-like layout, and I really like it, but there's just one friggin' problem. I usually have a sidebar where not-so-important content is placed. This content will include/includes advertisements, affiliates, updates, and the like. I really like the layout how it is but I have no idea where to place my sidebar content. I'm trying to not have it placed in an actual sidebar, but I have absolutely no clue as to where I would place it, position it, and in what it will be inside (if it has some sort of container). I'm stuck and I would really appreciate if you guys can help me out on this issue.



Also, don't hesitate to give C&C if you'd like. Thanks. _smile.gif
 
 
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 15)
markmejia
post Dec 23 2009, 07:52 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 1,815
Joined: Jun 2006
Member No: 423,396



mm i like the whole vignetting/dramatic lighting idea. but you can definitely use better fonts. the fonts im seeing here look way too generic, esp. the nav.
 
Mikeplyts
post Dec 24 2009, 04:12 AM
Post #3


Mel Blanc was allergic to carrots.
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 6,371
Joined: Aug 2008
Member No: 676,291



QUOTE(markmejia @ Dec 23 2009, 09:52 PM) *
mm i like the whole vignetting/dramatic lighting idea. but you can definitely use better fonts. the fonts im seeing here look way too generic, esp. the nav.

Meh, I'd prefer generic, it seems to be more (somewhat) appealing than those fancy, decorative, overrated fonts. Any ideas on where I could place that sidebar content, except not in a sidebar?
 
deteam
post Dec 24 2009, 03:19 PM
Post #4


Senior Member
*****

Group: Human
Posts: 525
Joined: Nov 2008
Member No: 695,913



i like it, and maybe place it at the bottom ?

blink.gif

Stay Up
-1-
Subliminal
 
none345678
post Dec 24 2009, 03:24 PM
Post #5


Sex, Blood, & RocknRoll
*******

Group: People Staff
Posts: 5,305
Joined: Nov 2007
Member No: 596,480



I %101 agree with Mark about the font. For the side bar stuff just put it all on a separate page.
 
brooklyneast05
post Dec 24 2009, 03:26 PM
Post #6


I'm Jc
********

Group: Mentor
Posts: 13,619
Joined: Jul 2006
Member No: 437,556



looks pretty good. abbey told me that she would like it better if it was all comic sans, but i told her that yours looked better as is. don't listen to her.
 
none345678
post Dec 24 2009, 03:28 PM
Post #7


Sex, Blood, & RocknRoll
*******

Group: People Staff
Posts: 5,305
Joined: Nov 2007
Member No: 596,480



You're lucky I can't edit post anymore, mister.
 
Mikeplyts
post Dec 24 2009, 04:28 PM
Post #8


Mel Blanc was allergic to carrots.
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 6,371
Joined: Aug 2008
Member No: 676,291



QUOTE(IWontRapeYou @ Dec 24 2009, 05:24 PM) *
I %101 agree with Mark about the font. For the side bar stuff just put it all on a separate page.

I really can't do that because if I plan on having content such as advertisements and affiliates, that content should be displayed on every page.
 
markmejia
post Dec 27 2009, 04:11 AM
Post #9


Senior Member
******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 1,815
Joined: Jun 2006
Member No: 423,396



QUOTE(Mikeplyts @ Dec 24 2009, 01:12 AM) *
Meh, I'd prefer generic, it seems to be more (somewhat) appealing than those fancy, decorative, overrated fonts.

not all fonts are fancy/decorative/overrated. i'm talking about the simplistic, modern-looking, but still-not-generic fonts.. fonts like Swiss Light Condensed or AvantGarde LT or FrancophilSans.
 
venti-anemoi
post Dec 27 2009, 03:08 PM
Post #10


torn
*****

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 953
Joined: Oct 2004
Member No: 55,718



I think a sidebar would mess up the flow of the layout. I agree with deteam; put it at the bottom.
 
Mikeplyts
post Dec 27 2009, 03:40 PM
Post #11


Mel Blanc was allergic to carrots.
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 6,371
Joined: Aug 2008
Member No: 676,291



QUOTE(deteam @ Dec 24 2009, 05:19 PM) *
i like it, and maybe place it at the bottom ?

blink.gif

Stay Up
-1-
Subliminal
QUOTE(venti-anemoi @ Dec 27 2009, 05:08 PM) *
I think a sidebar would mess up the flow of the layout. I agree with deteam; put it at the bottom.

Yeah, I could see it there, but, that would make it seem like less important content. I wouldn't want to make it seem like my content (which is for public use and viewing, nonetheless) is more important or "better" than advertisements (which I'm actually getting paid for, or will get paid for).
 
fixtatik
post Dec 27 2009, 03:48 PM
Post #12


Senior Member
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,237
Joined: May 2008
Member No: 648,123



Look at it this way: do you want advertisements and affiliates (which lead people away from your site) to be considered equal to or greater than the value of the site your visitors are on in the first place? Using a sidebar makes them seem equal, possibly even more prominent if you stick to using white/bright images on a dark layout.

Same deal as before...think about where you want your visitors to look. First impression is above the fold, and you don't really want to send off the effect that you're only about advertisements and affiliates. Your navigation blends in as it is, so eyes first go to the content that you created. After the content, they should go back up to the navigation so they can go to more pages on your site. When they're done, either leave by pushing the "X", or by visiting one of the advertisements or affiliates at the bottom of the page.
 
technicolour
post Dec 27 2009, 07:15 PM
Post #13


show me a garden thats bursting to life
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 12,303
Joined: Mar 2005
Member No: 115,987



QUOTE(markmejia @ Dec 23 2009, 06:52 PM) *
mm i like the whole vignetting/dramatic lighting idea. but you can definitely use better fonts. the fonts im seeing here look way too generic, esp. the nav.


THIS.

Like, word for word.
 
manny-the-dino
post Dec 30 2009, 03:46 AM
Post #14


Senior Member
*******

Group: Administrator
Posts: 8,629
Joined: Jan 2007
Member No: 498,468



I second Mark's response. It looks really nice but it'd look even better with different, more exciting fonts. thumbsup.gif
 
HakunaMatata
post Dec 30 2009, 04:59 AM
Post #15


Home is where your rump rests!
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 4,235
Joined: Aug 2006
Member No: 451,969



QUOTE(fixtatik @ Dec 27 2009, 12:48 PM) *
Look at it this way: do you want advertisements and affiliates (which lead people away from your site) to be considered equal to or greater than the value of the site your visitors are on in the first place? Using a sidebar makes them seem equal, possibly even more prominent if you stick to using white/bright images on a dark layout.

Same deal as before...think about where you want your visitors to look. First impression is above the fold, and you don't really want to send off the effect that you're only about advertisements and affiliates. Your navigation blends in as it is, so eyes first go to the content that you created. After the content, they should go back up to the navigation so they can go to more pages on your site. When they're done, either leave by pushing the "X", or by visiting one of the advertisements or affiliates at the bottom of the page.
*searing. into. brain.*

About the design, I'm going to go with everyone else on the font front. Not explicitly because it's generic, but because the font looks too much like the font in the content. Matchy-matchy bugs me.
 
Mikeplyts
post Dec 30 2009, 10:07 AM
Post #16


Mel Blanc was allergic to carrots.
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 6,371
Joined: Aug 2008
Member No: 676,291



QUOTE(HakunaMatata @ Dec 30 2009, 06:59 AM) *
About the design, I'm going to go with everyone else on the font front. Not explicitly because it's generic, but because the font looks too much like the font in the content. Matchy-matchy bugs me.

But, Nonmatchy-nonmatchy bugs me as well. But yeah, okay, I guess I could look into looking around for some different fonts.
 

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: