wtf |
  |
 Apr 30 2008, 09:36 PM
Post
#26
|
|
 Senior Member  Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 3,645 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 4,975  |
That would have been much more work.
Her face is censored, though. |
|
|
|
|
Apr 30 2008, 09:55 PM
Post
#27
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Administrator Posts: 8,629 Joined: Jan 2007 Member No: 498,468 |
wait, why would you guys censor her anyways?
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 30 2008, 10:02 PM
Post
#28
|
|
 crushed. Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 9,432 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 20,026 |
^because she deleted the original topic that the pictures were in. and because they don't like her.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 30 2008, 10:03 PM
Post
#29
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Administrator Posts: 8,629 Joined: Jan 2007 Member No: 498,468 |
^ LOL ok
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 30 2008, 10:10 PM
Post
#30
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,095 Joined: Jul 2005 Member No: 171,080 |
QUOTE(Teesa @ Apr 30 2008, 10:02 PM)  ^because she deleted the original topic that the pictures were in. and because they don't like her. Not necessarily that they don't like her, it's just the fact that they had all taken the pictures together. Trish deleted the thread. Elba and Christina wanted the pictures up so they just put up a censor. Who f**king cares what it is? Her face isn't in it; that's what she wants. Dani said something like she's still going to be offended because she's in the picture...ok, and? They're not going to sit there and edit her out. Like it's been said, she wasn't offended last time. If it's been posted before, it should be allowed to be posted now. |
|
|
|
|
Apr 30 2008, 10:11 PM
Post
#31
|
|
 This bag is not a toy. Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 3,090 Joined: Oct 2007 Member No: 583,108 |
It's not because she's in the picture that she should be offended, it's because of the way they censored her. Why should we allow that and how is that NOT member bashing?
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 30 2008, 10:13 PM
Post
#32
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,095 Joined: Jul 2005 Member No: 171,080 |
How is her randomly deleting the thread that ANOTHER MEMBER made not against the rules? There was absolutely nothing wrong with the thread the first time.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 30 2008, 10:13 PM
Post
#33
|
|
 yan lin♥ Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 14,129 Joined: Apr 2004 Member No: 13,627 |
not to mention deleting it from the trash can.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 30 2008, 10:13 PM
Post
#34
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 3,645 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 4,975 |
You're reason for closing it was that it was considered posting another member's picture without their permission. You didn't say anything about member bashing. If we had censored her with something else, would it have been okay? You made it seem like those pictures couldn't be posted at all because Trish was originally in them.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 30 2008, 10:23 PM
Post
#35
|
|
|
This bag is not a toy. Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 3,090 Joined: Oct 2007 Member No: 583,108 |
Believe me, I'm not saying that's okay (deleting the topic).
When I closed the first topic (which obviously was pointless) you guys gave the reasoning that she wasn't in the pictures. She WAS in the pictures (just not her face); and in my opinion what you did to the pictures was worse than leaving them intact. If you were going to take her out of the picture, I don't see why you couldn't just use a normal censor. In fact, it would probably be easier and take less effort to scratch her out with the brush tool than to put the trash can over her face. I'm sorry for not being more clear when I posted my response in that thread, but my reasoning was a combination of the two. If you had just taken her out of the picture using any normal means I would have no problem with the pictures being posted. However, as I would do with any member, I am looking out for the fact that the pictures were edited in a way that was disrespectful - you didn't just take her out of the picture, you made it a point to insult her in the process. |
|
|
|
|
Apr 30 2008, 10:26 PM
Post
#36
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 3,645 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 4,975 |
It was a TRASH CAN. Trash can because she deleted topics from the trash can. It wasn't intended to insult her. Just poke fun at the deletion of things--like the deletion of the original topic.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 30 2008, 10:32 PM
Post
#37
|
|
|
This bag is not a toy. Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 3,090 Joined: Oct 2007 Member No: 583,108 |
That's fine, I just don't think she took it that way and all I'm saying is that I can see why.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 30 2008, 10:32 PM
Post
#38
|
|
 sleep now, moon Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 2,540 Joined: May 2007 Member No: 526,212 |
it kind of sounds like we're throwing around elastic clauses right now, with our elastic clause being that the pictures are demeaning, and yours that you're just poking fun.
how do you expect someone to decipher what anything actually really means, especially on the internet? |
|
|
|
|
Apr 30 2008, 10:33 PM
Post
#39
|
|
|
yan lin♥ Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 14,129 Joined: Apr 2004 Member No: 13,627 |
theinternetisseriousbusiness
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 30 2008, 10:36 PM
Post
#40
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 3,645 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 4,975 |
Closed again?
Why doesn't that bitch bitch about things in public instead of hiding backstage. Baibai |
|
|
|
|
Apr 30 2008, 10:41 PM
Post
#41
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,095 Joined: Jul 2005 Member No: 171,080 |
QUOTE(sparrowdust @ Apr 30 2008, 10:32 PM) how do you expect someone to decipher what anything actually really means, especially on the internet? That's not just a one sided question... |
|
|
|
|
Apr 30 2008, 10:46 PM
Post
#42
|
|
|
sleep now, moon Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 2,540 Joined: May 2007 Member No: 526,212 |
true story. but i'm pretty sure that if we had kids roaming around the school with "white pride" shirts, they'd probably get in trouble.
i think the question here (there and everywhere) is if whatever it is you wanna discuss is offensive. we could be tama and report absolutely everything, or take on a completely lackadaisical attitude towards everything that goes on here, which would most likely drive away any new potentially active members. i personally feel that we have a decent median that isn't all that intimidating to the nubs, and that if said nubs went on and visited the 2/3/4/bitches(+trashcan)topic, they'd find a humorously hostile environment. not universally appealing. (all right, nothing's universally appealing. catch my drift somewhat, though?) |
|
|
|
|
Apr 30 2008, 10:49 PM
Post
#43
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,095 Joined: Jul 2005 Member No: 171,080 |
Well, start removing every picture that has someone else in it besides the poster. You don't have their friend/whoever else is in the picture's permission. That's what you're getting at, so get started.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 30 2008, 10:53 PM
Post
#44
|
|
 Cornflakes :D Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,541 Joined: Dec 2005 Member No: 322,923 |
I use to go to school everyday and where a straight pride hoodie.
I mean it doesn't say White pride, but of course i offended the gay people, and I never got in trouble. |
|
|
|
|
Apr 30 2008, 10:54 PM
Post
#45
|
|
|
sleep now, moon Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 2,540 Joined: May 2007 Member No: 526,212 |
actually
QUOTE If found posting pictures of other memebers in order to demean them, the image will be removed and you will have an increased warning and if needed put on mod preview. only if there are other memebers in the picture. or if some random friend of a member messages me or something odd and is like what the f**k take down my picture, then yeah, sure, i'll take the thing off. i can see how trashcans over faces can be demeaning. pictures with multiple people just being there... i'm not seeing it. let's all collectively try for some integrity, now. |
|
|
|
|
Apr 30 2008, 10:55 PM
Post
#46
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,095 Joined: Jul 2005 Member No: 171,080 |
The other day was the day of silence thing. My brother who is in MIDDLE SCHOOL said there were kids with signs on their shirts that said "God created Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve." Your point doesn't exactly work, now.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 30 2008, 10:56 PM
Post
#47
|
|
|
Cornflakes :D Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,541 Joined: Dec 2005 Member No: 322,923 |
lol. Adam and steve. haha
[/spam] |
|
|
|
|
Apr 30 2008, 10:57 PM
Post
#48
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,095 Joined: Jul 2005 Member No: 171,080 |
QUOTE(sparrowdust @ Apr 30 2008, 10:54 PM) actually IT'S NOT FUCKING DEMEANING! TRISH IS JUST PISSED THAT THEY PUT THE PICTURES BACK UP AND SHE NEEDS SOMETHING TO BITCH ABOUT! IT'S ALL SHE'S GOOD AT! GOD, STFU ABOUT THIS DEMEANING BULLSHIT!only if there are other memebers in the picture. or if some random friend of a member messages me or something odd and is like what the f**k take down my picture, then yeah, sure, i'll take the thing off. i can see how trashcans over faces can be demeaning. pictures with multiple people just being there... i'm not seeing it. let's all collectively try for some integrity, now. |
|
|
|
|
Apr 30 2008, 10:57 PM
Post
#49
|
|
 ٩(͡๏̯͡๏)۶ Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 14,309 Joined: Nov 2004 Member No: 65,593 |
I have an "Asian Pride" shirt.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 30 2008, 10:58 PM
Post
#50
|
|
|
Cornflakes :D Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,541 Joined: Dec 2005 Member No: 322,923 |
Oh I agree that it could have been demeaning and all, I mean at first I thought it meant that Trish was gross or something. Then when they said it was because she deleted the topics, I don't want to get into it. Because you know as much as I think its horrible at how much they poke at Trish about things..Trish should have just came out and said "Hey I didn't delete the topic" instead of allowing everyone to assume it was her. I said that in a PM, just figured I would post it here too. |
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: