Europe turns back to coal Options

[brooklyneast05]

Europe Turns Back to Coal, Raising Climate Fears

CIVITAVECCHIA, Italy — At a time when the world’s top climate experts agree that carbon emissions must be rapidly reduced to hold down global warming, Italy’s major electricity producer, Enel, is converting its massive power plant here from oil to coal, generally the dirtiest fuel on earth

Over the next five years, Italy will increase its reliance on coal to 33 percent from 14 percent. Power generated by Enel from coal will rise to 50 percent.

And Italy is not alone in its return to coal. Driven by rising demand, record high oil and natural gas prices, concerns over energy security and an aversion to nuclear energy, European countries are expected to put into operation about 50 coal-fired plants over the next five years, plants that will be in use for the next five decades.

In the United States, fewer new coal plants are likely to begin operations, in part because it is becoming harder to get regulatory permits and in part because nuclear power remains an alternative. Of 151 proposals in early 2007, more than 60 had been dropped by the year’s end, many blocked by state governments. Dozens of other are stuck in court challenges.

The fast-expanding developing economies of India and China, where coal remains a major fuel source for more than two billion people, have long been regarded as among the biggest challenges to reducing carbon emissions. But the return now to coal even in eco-conscious Europe is sowing real alarm among environmentalists who warn that it is setting the world on a disastrous trajectory that will make controlling global warming impossible.

They are aghast at the renaissance of coal, a fuel more commonly associated with the sooty factories of Dickens novels, and one that was on its way out just a decade ago.

There have been protests here in Civitavecchia, at a new coal plant in Germany, and at one in the Czech Republic, as well as at the Kingsnorth power station in Kent, which is slated to become Britain’s first new coal-fired plant in more than a decade.

Europe’s power station owners emphasize that they are making the new coal plants as clean as possible. But critics say that “clean coal” is a pipe dream, an oxymoron in terms of the carbon emissions that count most toward climate change. They call the building spurt shortsighted.

This is only a few paragraphs, full article here


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/23/world/eu...tml?ref=science

watcha think about that?

[illriginal]

Damn. I thought they were gonna prosper with Nuclear energy, pffft so much for that idea.

[brooklyneast05]

it says that germany and italy have bans on nuclear power plants, so idk.

[illriginal]

it says that germany and italy have bans on nuclear power plants, so idk.

I know, I was hoping they would realize that Nuclear energy would be beneficial... but I guess France failed to prove themselves to Europe.

[brooklyneast05]

why do these countries have these bans?

[illriginal]

why do these countries have these bans?

Health related issues I believe. They don't want to chance the possibility of a Nuclear reactor being attacked or just self-imploding and causing harm to their country men and women.

[brooklyneast05]

that's what i figured, but i wasn't sure.