Log In · Register

 
2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Wikipedia, o_o whos a homo?
LoveToMySilas
post Apr 28 2008, 10:12 PM
Post #1


That's what she said.
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 3,559
Joined: Apr 2005
Member No: 130,200



I was looking up some information and definitions for my AP European History review book on Wikipedia (yeah, not very accurate because people can edit and what not) but I've never experienced any problems with that until today when I saw this:



What are some of your weird wikipedia moments? Or if you don't have any, do you trust wikipedia?
 
brooklyneast05
post Apr 28 2008, 10:14 PM
Post #2


I'm Jc
********

Group: Mentor
Posts: 13,619
Joined: Jul 2006
Member No: 437,556



one time i was reading and the entire middle of an article was like this a;lskdjfa;slfjsal;fjsl;fjasl;dfjalsfjal;fjawel;fjawel;fjeflejwf;elwkjfew;lkfjawe
;
a;lsdkfjal;sfjlsd;fjals;fjsd;lkfjasl;fjsldfjsdl;fjasl;fkjsadlkfjdsafjas;dlfjkdsa
j
a;lksfjsal;jfals;dfjsadl;fjasdl;fjadsl;fjals;dfjadls;fjasdl;fjasdl;fjasdl;fjasdf

alsdfja;sldkfjasl;fjasl;dfjals;dfjkasl;dkfjasl;dfjasl;fjdsal;afjdafdls;fkjads;

so i skipped that section
 
LoveToMySilas
post Apr 28 2008, 10:15 PM
Post #3


That's what she said.
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 3,559
Joined: Apr 2005
Member No: 130,200



Thats really weird, do they let anyone edit it? They don't even have an editor who checks it?
 
brooklyneast05
post Apr 28 2008, 10:18 PM
Post #4


I'm Jc
********

Group: Mentor
Posts: 13,619
Joined: Jul 2006
Member No: 437,556



no clue. it was gone when i went back just a little bit later, so i guess someone looks over newly edited ones? or something
 
LoveToMySilas
post Apr 28 2008, 10:25 PM
Post #5


That's what she said.
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 3,559
Joined: Apr 2005
Member No: 130,200



I wonder why nobody changed the "he was a homo" part. I'm sure many people have to look up whatshisface a day.
 
mizzkewl06
post Apr 28 2008, 10:34 PM
Post #6


<(^_^<) DANCE!(>^_^)>
******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 1,304
Joined: Nov 2007
Member No: 586,621



i was skimming through something one day and one paragraph in particular caught my attention. the phrase "was so gay" was randomly placed throughout... i checked back thenext day and it was gone. it was so weird. _unsure.gif ever since i try not to use wiki...
 
moninja
post Apr 28 2008, 10:40 PM
Post #7


R U A Q T ? [;
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 7,276
Joined: Jun 2006
Member No: 421,631



i love editing wiki things. i remember when cbc [kc&jerome] changed amerie and cassie's wikis. haaaahhaa good times
 
aaaron
post Apr 28 2008, 11:06 PM
Post #8


Newbie
*

Group: Member
Posts: 1
Joined: Apr 2008
Member No: 645,039



thus why wikipedia is inaccurate...because of the dumbasses that edit articles.
 
heyo-captain-jac...
post Apr 28 2008, 11:08 PM
Post #9


/人◕‿‿◕人\
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 8,283
Joined: Dec 2007
Member No: 602,927



Wikipedia sucks.
 
NoSex
post Apr 29 2008, 01:57 AM
Post #10


in the reverb chamber.
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 4,022
Joined: Nov 2005
Member No: 300,308



QUOTE(XTC @ Apr 28 2008, 11:08 PM) *
Wikipedia sucks.


You're a jackass.
Wikipedia is probably the most innovative, amazing, and liberating addition to the real information age to date. It's a very important, very useful, and very revolutionary tool.

And, don't forget, Wikipedia's accuracy is practically equitable to Encyclopedia Britannica's [1].
 
Insurmountable
post Apr 29 2008, 02:00 AM
Post #11


Cornflakes :D
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 4,541
Joined: Dec 2005
Member No: 322,923



Hmm, I've never had a moment like that. I've used wiki for quite a few of my reports and I've never seen any problems or had any. I usually don't take whats on the wiki though, and just use the resource sites that are posted with it.
 
queen
post Apr 29 2008, 02:04 AM
Post #12


‹(. .)›
******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 2,367
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 20,089



i used to update the yg family wiki all the time.

wikipedia has admins who keep track of what needs to be fixed.

i once "vandalized" a wiki page of one of the admins (long story). i just left the AIM sn of the person i knew vandalized the page the night before, and in his case, he really did f**k up the page a whole lot.
 
S-Majere
post Apr 29 2008, 07:56 AM
Post #13


Addict
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 3,918
Joined: Jun 2007
Member No: 538,522



I love Wikipedia - it's saved my ass countless times over workshops I forget to prepare for or lectures I know nothing about.

Just gotta check your sources if you do use it. Academically, the site is shunned - but IMO they're all pissed off that Wiki knows more than they do without spending it's life in the library and drinking tea.
 
mizzkewl06
post Apr 29 2008, 08:05 AM
Post #14


<(^_^<) DANCE!(>^_^)>
******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 1,304
Joined: Nov 2007
Member No: 586,621



QUOTE(S-Majere @ Apr 29 2008, 08:56 AM) *
I love Wikipedia - it's saved my ass countless times over workshops I forget to prepare for or lectures I know nothing about.

Just gotta check your sources if you do use it. Academically, the site is shunned - but IMO they're all pissed off that Wiki knows more than they do without spending it's life in the library and drinking tea.

laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif
 
eeonz
post Apr 29 2008, 08:20 AM
Post #15


Senior Member
***

Group: Member
Posts: 64
Joined: Apr 2008
Member No: 642,341



QUOTE
You're a jackass.
Wikipedia is probably the most innovative, amazing, and liberating addition to the real information age to date. It's a very important, very useful, and very revolutionary tool.

And, don't forget, Wikipedia's accuracy is practically equitable to Encyclopedia Britannica's [1].


Tell that to your university lecturers. Yes, Wikipedia is a brilliant resource. However, there is the ability to go on to some people's entries and mess around with them and alter them until they make absolutely no sense.
 
The-March-Hare
post Apr 29 2008, 08:51 AM
Post #16


James killed the radio star.
******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 2,095
Joined: Nov 2007
Member No: 589,855



QUOTE(S-Majere @ Apr 29 2008, 01:56 PM) *
I love Wikipedia - it's saved my ass countless times over workshops I forget to prepare for or lectures I know nothing about.

Just gotta check your sources if you do use it. Academically, the site is shunned - but IMO they're all pissed off that Wiki knows more than they do without spending it's life in the library and drinking tea.

TRUTH.

Although there is nothing wrong with drinking an excess of tea. Nothingggg.
 
eeonz
post Apr 29 2008, 09:23 AM
Post #17


Senior Member
***

Group: Member
Posts: 64
Joined: Apr 2008
Member No: 642,341



And who do you think wrote most of those entries? Academics.
 
Sprague
post Apr 29 2008, 12:33 PM
Post #18


Senior Member
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 717
Joined: Mar 2008
Member No: 636,551



QUOTE(S-Majere @ Apr 29 2008, 05:56 AM) *
I love Wikipedia - it's saved my ass countless times over workshops I forget to prepare for or lectures I know nothing about.

Just gotta check your sources if you do use it. Academically, the site is shunned - but IMO they're all pissed off that Wiki knows more than they do without spending it's life in the library and drinking tea.


^Wordx3. :)
 
S-Majere
post Apr 29 2008, 12:36 PM
Post #19


Addict
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 3,918
Joined: Jun 2007
Member No: 538,522



QUOTE(The-March-Hare @ Apr 29 2008, 09:51 AM) *
TRUTH.

Although there is nothing wrong with drinking an excess of tea. Nothingggg.


Cream tea, old chap.
 
Jeng
post Apr 29 2008, 02:33 PM
Post #20


Senior Member
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 7,149
Joined: Aug 2005
Member No: 213,509



yea it can be mad funny though, like on somethings....I forgot. lol but I use it all the time, most of it is actually accurate besides the random edits, its just basically info from all kinds of different sources.
 
tokyo-rose
post Apr 29 2008, 02:36 PM
Post #21


Senior Member
********

Group: Head Staff
Posts: 18,173
Joined: Mar 2005
Member No: 108,478



QUOTE(eeonz @ Apr 29 2008, 09:20 AM) *
Tell that to your university lecturers. Yes, Wikipedia is a brilliant resource. However, there is the ability to go on to some people's entries and mess around with them and alter them until they make absolutely no sense.

I'm pretty sure Nate was being sarcastic.

One of my friends edited an article so that it mentioned something about a leg of ham. ...yeah, I don't even know, but he and another friend of mine were laughing about it. I don't know if the editor got in trouble.
 
NoSex
post Apr 29 2008, 03:28 PM
Post #22


in the reverb chamber.
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 4,022
Joined: Nov 2005
Member No: 300,308



QUOTE(Synesthesia @ Apr 29 2008, 02:36 PM) *
I'm pretty sure Nate was being sarcastic.


Reading over my post, the tone does appear to be largely sarcastic. But, really, I was being entirely sincere. I think Wikipedia is probably the most important thing in the world right now.
 
tokyo-rose
post Apr 29 2008, 03:50 PM
Post #23


Senior Member
********

Group: Head Staff
Posts: 18,173
Joined: Mar 2005
Member No: 108,478



QUOTE(NoSex @ Apr 29 2008, 04:28 PM) *
Reading over my post, the tone does appear to be largely sarcastic. But, really, I was being entirely sincere. I think Wikipedia is probably the most important thing in the world right now.

Haha, I couldn't tell. Your post is one of those replies that's either blatantly, pwnsomely sarcastic or totally serious. Knowing your personality, I thought you were being sarcastic.

Anyway, Wiki's not that bad. I rarely use it for school, but I use it to reference things I'm interested in. It's usually pretty accurate.
 
NoSex
post Apr 29 2008, 03:57 PM
Post #24


in the reverb chamber.
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 4,022
Joined: Nov 2005
Member No: 300,308



QUOTE(Synesthesia @ Apr 29 2008, 03:50 PM) *
Knowing your personality, I thought you were being sarcastic.


I'm usually not very sarcastic. But, I can be a total jerk... so, I get exactly where you're coming from.

Shit, maybe I'm just more sarcastic on the internet? I don't know.
 
superstitious
post Apr 29 2008, 06:06 PM
Post #25


Tick tock, Bill
*******

Group: Administrator
Posts: 8,764
Joined: Dec 2005
Member No: 333,948



QUOTE(NoSex @ Apr 29 2008, 03:57 PM) *
But, I can be a total jerk...

Can be? haha

Wikipedia is fantastic as long as you are aware that you need to double check facts (especially if you are using the site as an academic resource. Although, I'm not sure if that can be used as a resource).

I live on wikipedia for entertainment stuff. It's easy to browse through episode summaries and such.
 

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: