Log In · Register

 
 
Closed TopicStart new topic
since you guys are so strict with posting nudes
Elba
post Apr 5 2008, 07:16 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 3,645
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 4,975



http://www.createblog.com/forums/index.php...t&p=2902880

Is that person getting perma-banned, too? That picture was nasty, it was nude, and I am wondering why you didn't ban them Rebecca, after you removed the link?
 
rnicron
post Apr 5 2008, 07:17 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 4,095
Joined: Jul 2005
Member No: 171,080



It should be strictly enforced.
 
Elba
post Apr 5 2008, 07:17 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 3,645
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 4,975



Indeed.
 
vintage-toile
post Apr 5 2008, 07:19 PM
Post #4


Kissing for yesterday.
*****

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 465
Joined: Sep 2007
Member No: 569,813



QUOTE(Elba @ Apr 6 2008, 01:17 AM) *
Indeed.

and that word = *awkward silence*
shifty.gif
 
rnicron
post Apr 5 2008, 07:20 PM
Post #5


Senior Member
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 4,095
Joined: Jul 2005
Member No: 171,080



QUOTE(vintage-toile @ Apr 5 2008, 07:19 PM) *
and that word = *awkward silence*
shifty.gif
No, if you look, it says Rebecca's posting. She just always has long, thought out posts.
 
vintage-toile
post Apr 5 2008, 07:22 PM
Post #6


Kissing for yesterday.
*****

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 465
Joined: Sep 2007
Member No: 569,813



i don't really understand why people come to a graphics and layouts site anyway for that..there's something called other websites with less restricted material rolleyes.gif
 
rnicron
post Apr 5 2008, 07:23 PM
Post #7


Senior Member
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 4,095
Joined: Jul 2005
Member No: 171,080



QUOTE(vintage-toile @ Apr 5 2008, 07:22 PM) *
i don't really understand why people come to a graphics and layouts site anyway for that..there's something called other websites with less restricted material rolleyes.gif
Because we all come here to masturbate, right?
 
vintage-toile
post Apr 5 2008, 07:25 PM
Post #8


Kissing for yesterday.
*****

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 465
Joined: Sep 2007
Member No: 569,813



QUOTE(Spencer @ Apr 6 2008, 01:23 AM) *
Because we all come here to masturbate, right?

ahahahaha. sure...
biggrin.gif wit.
 
iDecay
post Apr 5 2008, 07:27 PM
Post #9


Pocketful of Sunshine
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 8,690
Joined: Nov 2005
Member No: 289,004



Well, Holly (Right?) cB's grown to be more than just a layout site, obviously.
 
rnicron
post Apr 5 2008, 07:28 PM
Post #10


Senior Member
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 4,095
Joined: Jul 2005
Member No: 171,080



Some feedback, yeah?
 
superstitious
post Apr 5 2008, 07:29 PM
Post #11


Tick tock, Bill
*******

Group: Administrator
Posts: 8,764
Joined: Dec 2005
Member No: 333,948



Elba, that person didn't go into someone's personal files to take that picture. That person didn't blast someone's personal photograph all over the forums. Your argument isn't valid. She was verbally warned for posting nudes. I will take the next step if the poster continues. This isn't even close to being the same thing.

Look, guys, I KNOW that this is frustrating, that it seems like what the f**k? Right? Why all of a sudden are we perma banning people. I get that frustration because I didn't get it at first either. I thought ban, sure, but perma? Holy crap what is THAT about?

But here's the thing. It's not so much that this punishment was drastic, it's that our historical ways of punishing were lackluster, to say the least. People shouldn't be posting that kind of crap and even now, I think a verbal warning was wimpy. But, here's the difference. It's not about Trish, it's not about a staff member. This could have been anyone. If someone had taken the time to seek out someone's personal pictures and blast them repeatedly around the forums that will get a much, MUCH stricter and harsher punishment than someone who posts a random nude picture they found on google images or something.

The severity of punishment will coincide with the severity of the crime (so-to-speak).

I have A LOT on my plate now but I am working on a clear set of guidelines that will make things even across the board, again, depending on the severity of the offense.

That is not at all a good enough answer and I know very well that many of you will still be frustrated. Unfortunately I am one person with an already very full plate so I am asking you to please be patient.
 
vintage-toile
post Apr 5 2008, 07:29 PM
Post #12


Kissing for yesterday.
*****

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 465
Joined: Sep 2007
Member No: 569,813



QUOTE(tininja @ Apr 6 2008, 01:27 AM) *
Well, Holly (Right?) cB's grown to be more than just a layout site, obviously.

it would seem so!
aha i know. my point is on the ground now.
pinch.gif
 
The-March-Hare
post Apr 5 2008, 07:31 PM
Post #13


James killed the radio star.
******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 2,095
Joined: Nov 2007
Member No: 589,855



Why isn't this in Feedback?
 
Tung
post Apr 6 2008, 04:53 PM
Post #14


٩(͡๏̯͡๏)۶
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 14,309
Joined: Nov 2004
Member No: 65,593



QUOTE(superstitious @ Apr 5 2008, 05:29 PM) *
She was verbally warned for posting nudes.

Not really complaining, but just ranting here. I posted a nude rick rolled site a few days ago, and I was put on Mod Preview for two days right away, without a warning or a verbal warning. Just wondering why I had the harsher punishment for practically doing the same thing like this girl.
 
superstitious
post Apr 6 2008, 04:55 PM
Post #15


Tick tock, Bill
*******

Group: Administrator
Posts: 8,764
Joined: Dec 2005
Member No: 333,948



Because I was a moron. Honestly, that was retarded of me.

We're still working on getting things very clearly stated regarding specific guidelines that will address this type of situation. Moving as fast as possible.
 
illriginal
post Apr 6 2008, 04:57 PM
Post #16


Senior Member
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 6,349
Joined: Aug 2006
Member No: 455,274



lol I could rat out 4 more people who were/are involved with spreading nudes across this forum. Personal pictures as well... I'm just not gonna snitch, yet. ph34r.gif

P.S. Which has nothin to do with the said thread mentioned in the opening post.
 
Tung
post Apr 6 2008, 07:26 PM
Post #17


٩(͡๏̯͡๏)۶
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 14,309
Joined: Nov 2004
Member No: 65,593



Oh. That's cool Rebecca. Honestly, I think you don't get appreciated enough with this.

QUOTE(Tamacracker @ Apr 6 2008, 02:57 PM) *
lol I could rat out 4 more people who were/are involved with spreading nudes across this forum. Personal pictures as well... I'm just not gonna snitch, yet. ph34r.gif


Spreading the pictures via PM, or on AIM, is sort of different than actually posting them on the forums and making threads about it. Unless, these 4 people did actually post the images?
 
NismoYo
post Apr 6 2008, 07:48 PM
Post #18


Senior Member
****

Group: Member
Posts: 152
Joined: Mar 2008
Member No: 636,188



boobs and pussy..whats wrong wit seein dem? everybody has seen some right..?.it all the same shit but with different lawn design..
if the issue is little kids then just PMed dem
 
libertie
post Apr 6 2008, 07:53 PM
Post #19


This bag is not a toy.
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 3,090
Joined: Oct 2007
Member No: 583,108



QUOTE(j4ye @ Apr 6 2008, 07:48 PM) *
boobs and pussy..whats wrong wit seein dem? everybody has seen some right..?.it all the same shit but with different lawn design..
if the issue is little kids then just PMed dem

The issue is that no community that allows under 18 visitors to use the site should allow that sort of content to be posted. All it takes is one angry parent to get this site in a lot of trouble, and we won't let that happen.

Also, even if our visitors were predominantly 18 and older (and they are most certainly not), we are a resource site, not a porn site. Those who wish to see that type of content may kindly look somewhere else.
 

Closed TopicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: