Hillary Clinton Options

[Mikael]

This post has been edited for security reasons.

[YaGurlSukedMe2SL...]

I also heard that she dislikes Asians or something like that

If that were true, there wouldn't be a 3:1 ratio of Hilary to Obama that asians have voted on.

[Simba]

If that were true, there wouldn't be a 3:1 ratio of Hilary to Obama that asians have voted on.

Or it could be the Asians' natural fear of blacks kicking in...

[*Steven*]

Or it could be the Asians' natural fear of blacks kicking in...

Fact.

[YaGurlSukedMe2SL...]

Or it could be the Asians' natural fear of blacks kicking in...

No

[kryogenix]

Hilary Clinton is a giant turd. She is not a New Yorker and will never be. It's funny as hell how all the f****ts who loved her for Bill now hate their guts since Obama is running against her.

Like Obama, she shouldn't even have ever become a senator. She only won because Giuliani had to drop out because his nutsack was exploding cause his wife divorced him, and the blacks didn't like him because the cops shot some black guy during his campaign. Yeah, that's right, that bitch jumped on the race issue to get her elected, and now the race issue is biting her in the ass. Payback is a bitch

Rick Lazio? Who the f**k is Rick Lazio? Look at this shit eating grin



That's why she won. Experience? What experience? Being married to the President doesn't make you experienced. Don't give me this experience bullshit. What a crock of shit.

What a piece of shit!

[pandamonium]

That's why she won. Experience? What experience? Being married to the President doesn't make you experienced. Don't give me this experience bullshit. What a crock of shit.

What a piece of shit!

EXACTLYYYY!! thank goodness someone else thinks this. what experience has hilary had? I heard this about three times already. I am not completely against hilary i am just wondering why people say that shes experienced.

[fameONE]

When people refer to the "experience" that Hillary Clinton has; many will view her marriage to Bill as a valid claim. She was already involved in a political arena, and with her husband balls deep in interns, err, um, international affairs, Hillary was by his side. Its like 'on the job' training, if you will.

I still don't like the bitch.

[Teesa]

^Yeah, Hillary has had experience in the White House, but most of her efforts failed (like with health care, etc.)

I like her, but I am more for Obama. I know candidates change views, but I am very turned off by the fact that she supported the Iraq war in the beginning, whereas Obama has always been against it. Also, even though universal health care is a good idea, I really don't think it is possible and that Obama's plan for making health care affordable is more realistic.

[fagget]

Well, I object to the the fact that electing Hilary would be putting another Clinton into office when we've already had two Bushes. I don't think establishing that sort of trend is very democratic. By merit of these connections, voting for Hilary would be the opposite of voting for change, which is what we all so desire, is it not? I fully think that a Democrat needs take the presidency for the next term given the disaster what was Bush. I think that would give the party a very big advantage as well. Given that a lot of people vote based on party affiliation alone, things are looking pretty favorable in the general election. Now, if people's dissatisfaction is enough to pull their opposition through, then we're going to need to have a good candidate as that opposition. This isn't Hilary. Lots of people have had an irrational hate of Hilary for a long time. Hilary isn't change. I don't even know how she's pulling "35 years of experience" out of her ass; being married to experience is not experience. She voted to go to war in Iraq. She's being guilty of gross demagoguery on too many occasions. And while many people are afraid because she's soooo liberal, I've actually studied her views and wouldn't consider her nearly liberal enough to get my vote.

On a very nonpersonal note, people don't want change, they think they do, but they don't. The vast majority of people, even in their personal life find that they think of themselves as more tolerant than they actually are.

In regards to Hillary, I disagree with you. There's been much talk about how it would be the same when Bill was pres. Not really. People neglect to realize that she, honestly, is her own person. Has always been a political activist and has really, far more so than any other first lady been very active politics, since her time in college. I think she has enough mind of her own to assess things the way that she wants to assess her. With that said though, I didn't vote for her, because one) I can't vote, but even if I can, I wouldn't.

I don't think that a Republican would win again. Just because of the public backlash against this establishment. I think that people who have no affiliation with politics can feel the stigma.

But I mean, a 15-year-olds mere opinion would seem silly and illegitimate. Correct?

[*paperplane*]

In regards to Hillary, I disagree with you. There's been much talk about how it would be the same when Bill was pres. Not really. People neglect to realize that she, honestly, is her own person. Has always been a political activist and has really, far more so than any other first lady been very active politics, since her time in college. I think she has enough mind of her own to assess things the way that she wants to assess her. With that said though, I didn't vote for her, because one) I can't vote, but even if I can, I wouldn't.

But I mean, a 15-year-olds mere opinion would seem silly and illegitimate. Correct?

Um, only because you completely missed my point.

My objection has nothing to do with a belief a vote for Hilary would be a vote for Bill; on the contrary, I cannot understand people who are voting for her sheerly because they essentially want him back. Political dynasties, I feel, have no place in a democracy (ignoring the fact that our government isn't technically democratic in the first place).

[YaGurlSukedMe2SL...]

Political dynasties, I feel, have no place in a democracy (ignoring the fact that our government isn't technically democratic in the first place).

Dynasty or not, shouldn't affect how the president is elected. If every Clinton and Bush were qualified to do the job(which is proven wrong, just my opinion), I wouldn't mind living in a so called "dynasty"

[fameONE]

Dynasty or not, shouldn't affect how the president is elected. If every Clinton and Bush were qualified to do the job(which is proven wrong, just my opinion), I wouldn't mind living in a so called "dynasty"

Feudal Japan, FTW.

[*paperplane*]

Dynasty or not, shouldn't affect how the president is elected. If every Clinton and Bush were qualified to do the job(which is proven wrong, just my opinion), I wouldn't mind living in a so called "dynasty"

Feudal Japan, FTW.

hahaha

[YaGurlSukedMe2SL...]

Feudal Japan, FTW.

Thats cause they didn't have TOM CRUISE!!

Oh and I retract my statement of Hilary winning, I shall wait for Texas.

[illriginal]

Plain and simple... her views/agenda seem very communistic. I'm down with Socialism but I'm sure the hell not falling for her fake ass accents and her communistic views. Over all... I'm going with Obama... I just hope he'll be a president for the people and not for the government.