O, Beautiful Calla Lilly!, My newest DIV, tell me what 'chu think? =3 |
This Month's Contests | Hosts Looking for Hostees | Hostees looking for Hosts | BigBookofResources
Submission Guidelines
![]() ![]() |
O, Beautiful Calla Lilly!, My newest DIV, tell me what 'chu think? =3 |
Nov 30 2007, 06:53 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() umm... i like to do stuff... =D ![]() Group: Member Posts: 9 Joined: Aug 2007 Member No: 568,393 |
Gah, I hate waiting! lol... Where are all the mods to look at pending layouts?? >< (No offense, guys. =P)
I made this one for my best friend, Kayla, because she absolutely LOVES calla lillys, but shhh... she doesn't know I made it yet... >.> Aaanywho... I'ts not my first, and coitanly not my last, but I'd still love to know what y'all think of it (the good and the bad), and what could be improved upon. Danke sehr! =D clickums. |
|
|
|
Nov 30 2007, 07:43 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Addict ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 3,918 Joined: Jun 2007 Member No: 538,522 |
Alright, alright you.
It was actually a damn pleasure to review this layout - I had and still have, trouble faulting it. It's a niggling detail but I dislike links that expand when you mouse over them. It just pushes the line out of order. Other than that tiny thing, one of the better layouts I've seen submitted for a while. |
|
|
|
Nov 30 2007, 07:49 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Naomi loves you. Y'all may call me NaNa ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Designer Posts: 2,925 Joined: Jun 2006 Member No: 427,774 |
I like it
|
|
|
|
Nov 30 2007, 08:29 PM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() umm... i like to do stuff... =D ![]() Group: Member Posts: 9 Joined: Aug 2007 Member No: 568,393 |
Aww thank's much! ^^ It's always nice to hear that.
I kind of like how links expand, it just looks cool to me. But I agree on how it throws the lines outta whack and make them look icky if it's really, really expanded. I hate when designers use something like 10pt terminal for links, and then have them hover at some stupid size like 30pt times bold, or whatever... |
|
|
|
Dec 1 2007, 12:32 AM
Post
#5
|
|
![]() sugar and spice ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 769 Joined: Nov 2007 Member No: 596,477 |
Calming picture. (: I like it. Although I'm really not a huge fan of the navigation link font. I never liked century gothic.
|
|
|
|
Dec 1 2007, 01:15 AM
Post
#6
|
|
![]() Resource Center Tyrant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 2,263 Joined: Nov 2007 Member No: 593,306 |
The small content box is absolutely atrocious. I'm sorry, but this layout was not meant for talkative people because I do not want to scroll for several seconds to read all of it.
|
|
|
|
Dec 1 2007, 02:16 PM
Post
#7
|
|
![]() umm... i like to do stuff... =D ![]() Group: Member Posts: 9 Joined: Aug 2007 Member No: 568,393 |
When you make a layout, try sticking to one, or at MOST, two fonts for the whole layout. In this layout, I think I see arial, century gothic, times new roman, etc etc. Hmm... I'm pretty sure the only fonts I used were century gothic and times new roman. Although, come to think of it now that you've said something, I don't think I defined the font for the "about" section. Maybe it auto-picked? But then wouldn't it have gone to times? I do think maybe I used arial as a backup incase someone's pc didn't have century gothic, but I'm pretty sure that was only for the headers. I dunno, but I can see how having a bunch of fonts would make it look icky. I think I'll go fix it now. Thanks for letting me know. =] |
|
|
|
Dec 1 2007, 06:05 PM
Post
#8
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,025 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 4,051 |
Eh it's ok. Not really anything special, I wouldn't have accepted it.
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |