Log In · Register

 

Debate Rules

Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.

Debate.

9 Pages V  « < 6 7 8 9 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
bombings on japan, were the really needed
Did the US have to bomb Japan
You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Total Votes: 71
Guests cannot vote 
simx
post May 10 2006, 12:46 AM
Post #176


"Silly me, I thought this was a free country"
******

Group: Human
Posts: 1,666
Joined: Nov 2004
Member No: 60,913



I'm Japanese.. my family is from Hiroshima....

yea I feel the bombing was justified. The US gave the Japanese way more than enough time to surrender prior to the bombing.
 
Terror
post May 10 2006, 10:19 PM
Post #177


B-rex
****

Group: Member
Posts: 149
Joined: Apr 2005
Member No: 128,689



Of f**king course it was justified on our part. The Japanese wouldnt have surrendered, they would have fought for their homeland and caused enormously heavy casualties on both the US and the Japanese sides.
And, as a sort of testament to their no surrender spirit, after we dropped the first nuke on Hiroshima, they STILL didn't give up. It took another nuking and 70,000+ more casualties just for them to throw in the towel.

You have to admire their spirit though.
 
sillakilla220
post May 11 2006, 02:02 AM
Post #178


Senior Member
****

Group: Member
Posts: 277
Joined: Feb 2006
Member No: 381,654



hell yeah f**k those japs and anyone else squealin they lips
 
Terror
post May 11 2006, 07:04 AM
Post #179


B-rex
****

Group: Member
Posts: 149
Joined: Apr 2005
Member No: 128,689



^ That's pretty damn racist and stupid.
People like you are why foreigners believe so strongly that all Americans are racist assholes.
 
*CrackedRearView*
post May 11 2006, 06:01 PM
Post #180





Guest






^

You're right, but they're also aware that a good majority of us are stupid. Sillakilla fits that bill quite nicely.
 
sillakilla220
post May 12 2006, 03:35 PM
Post #181


Senior Member
****

Group: Member
Posts: 277
Joined: Feb 2006
Member No: 381,654



yeah i'm real f**kin stupid huh, so stupid i'll be attending ucla next semester muthafucka... my comments really werent that racist all i said was that i agreed w/ the bombings... and i used the word jap which isnt even a racist slur i just didnt feel like writing japanese ppl...
 
*CrackedRearView*
post May 12 2006, 04:40 PM
Post #182





Guest






Yes, because I forgot how selective UCLA really is. Nevermind the fact that anyone who is a resident of California and has a pulse usually gets admitted.

Forgive me.
 
Terror
post May 12 2006, 05:18 PM
Post #183


B-rex
****

Group: Member
Posts: 149
Joined: Apr 2005
Member No: 128,689



Oooh, your going to college, so that automatically makes you an intelligent and politically correct individual? WRONG.
Maybe if your typing and grammar skills were a bit less 9 year old girl looking, people would actually think your intelligent.
And YES, the word "Jap", IS a racial slur, ESPECIALLY in the context you put it.
"f**king japs"
Yeah buddy, its real easy to see you'll be attending UCLA with the way you spell "ppl".
 
sillakilla220
post May 14 2006, 07:18 PM
Post #184


Senior Member
****

Group: Member
Posts: 277
Joined: Feb 2006
Member No: 381,654



hahahaha... yeah ucla is actually pretty selective, im not even gonna lie. its not harvard or yale but its up there. but nevermind that the japanese did deserve what they got. i'm sorry for those who got nuked up but in war casualties happen. we didn't do sh*t to deserve pearl harbor.
 
AngryBaby
post May 14 2006, 11:09 PM
Post #185


L!ckitySplit
*******

Group: Member
Posts: 4,325
Joined: Apr 2005
Member No: 129,329



XD ^
 
sadolakced acid
post May 15 2006, 01:58 AM
Post #186


dripping destruction
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,282
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 21,929



someday they will say the same thing about you, skillakilla
 
*Uronacid*
post May 17 2006, 12:00 AM
Post #187





Guest






YES EF EM!!!!!
 
think!IMAGINARIL...
post May 17 2006, 08:13 PM
Post #188


.
*******

Group: Member
Posts: 3,264
Joined: Jan 2004
Member No: 761



QUOTE(sillakilla220 @ May 11 2006, 3:02 AM) *
hell yeah f**k those japs and anyone else squealin they lips

and why do you think that bombing Japan was the right thing to do?
 
sillakilla220
post May 18 2006, 12:43 AM
Post #189


Senior Member
****

Group: Member
Posts: 277
Joined: Feb 2006
Member No: 381,654



well i think the japanese deserved to get bombed on because we had not seen what the atomic bombs could do yet and they gave us a reason to find out. they obviously wanted us in the war so we handled it.
 
*CrackedRearView*
post May 18 2006, 05:46 PM
Post #190





Guest






We knew what the bombs would do -- we dropped a nearly exact replica in the Southwestern desert in the weeks preceding the drop.
 
sillakilla220
post May 19 2006, 06:48 PM
Post #191


Senior Member
****

Group: Member
Posts: 277
Joined: Feb 2006
Member No: 381,654



true but we needed to see how bad it could hurt humans
 
*mipadi*
post May 20 2006, 08:48 AM
Post #192





Guest






QUOTE(sillakilla220 @ May 19 2006, 7:48 PM) *
true but we needed to see how bad it could hurt humans

Arguably that's a justification for the first bomb, but what about the second?
 
cashmere deer
post May 21 2006, 11:34 AM
Post #193


Senior Member
***

Group: Member
Posts: 99
Joined: Apr 2006
Member No: 399,520



Though I do feel bad for the many innocence that were killed, I do believe it was necessary. Revenge, to make a point, to save thousands of soldiers, whatever reason I think we made the right choice.

QUOTE(mipadi @ May 20 2006, 6:48 AM) *
Arguably that's a justification for the first bomb, but what about the second?



Japan was given three days to surrender. They did not.
 
31miracles
post May 21 2006, 02:05 PM
Post #194


cvchango
*****

Group: Human
Posts: 492
Joined: Dec 2005
Member No: 332,717



I can't believe we are arguing about this topic
ofcourse U.S. should have nuked the bloody japs
the japs killed WAY more chinese than hitler killed jews during WWII
"RAPE OF NANKING" ring a bell?
the "honorable" japs went to China killing and raping all the civilians they could get their hand's on, including women and children
my greatgrandmother's sister was killed at an age of 5 by the japs
what pisses me off is that we learn how bad hitler was in school but not one word about the dirty japs
even to this day, japan has not aplogized for their actions
i know the U.S. didn't nuke the japs to save the chinese, but i'm glad they blew the japs up
i bet the don't teach this in japanese schools
 
*mipadi*
post May 21 2006, 03:17 PM
Post #195





Guest






QUOTE(cashmere deer @ May 21 2006, 12:34 PM) *
Japan was given three days to surrender. They did not.

That's hardly enough time for an entire government to capitulate. Imagine if the US government had to do anything in three days.
 
cashmere deer
post May 22 2006, 08:42 AM
Post #196


Senior Member
***

Group: Member
Posts: 99
Joined: Apr 2006
Member No: 399,520



QUOTE(mipadi @ May 21 2006, 1:17 PM) *
That's hardly enough time for an entire government to capitulate. Imagine if the US government had to do anything in three days.



The point is is that we did give them time. When we dropped the second bomb it was not because they had not reached a decision, it was because they decided not to surrender.
 
*mipadi*
post May 22 2006, 09:35 AM
Post #197





Guest






QUOTE(cashmere deer @ May 22 2006, 9:42 AM) *
The point is is that we did give them time. When we dropped the second bomb it was not because they had not reached a decision, it was because they decided not to surrender.

No, the point is we did not give them ample time. There was no concrete decision to surrender or not; while the military favored a continued fight, some government officials favored surrender.

Furthermore, the entry of Russia into the war with Japan may have forced a surrender, or at least not required substantial US military intervention.
 
Terror
post May 22 2006, 11:32 AM
Post #198


B-rex
****

Group: Member
Posts: 149
Joined: Apr 2005
Member No: 128,689



If your government DOES NOT recognize the fact that the US was NOT f**king around when it dropped the Hiroshima nuke, then that is something YOU have to deal with.
They got nuked once, they had a period where they had to overlook their stance and they decided they would NOT surrender, so we nuked some sense into them.
 
*mipadi*
post May 22 2006, 12:10 PM
Post #199





Guest






QUOTE(SoManyTearz @ May 22 2006, 12:32 PM) *
They got nuked once, they had a period where they had to overlook their stance and they decided they would NOT surrender, so we nuked some sense into them.

Show me on instance after the first bombing when the Japanese government and the Japanese military announced that they would not surrender.
 
Tribal J_Rome
post May 22 2006, 12:45 PM
Post #200


wut wut in the butt?
******

Group: Human
Posts: 2,108
Joined: Sep 2005
Member No: 227,723



QUOTE(mipadi @ May 21 2006, 1:17 PM) *
That's hardly enough time for an entire government to capitulate. Imagine if the US government had to do anything in three days.

I didnt' think about that until you said it.
Wikipedia
QUOTE
On the morning of August 6, 1945 the United States Army Air Forces dropped the nuclear weapon "Little Boy" on the city of Hiroshima, followed three days later by the detonation of the "Fat Man" bomb over Nagasaki, Japan

QUOTE
Because no U.S. invasion was imminent, it is argued that the U.S. had nothing to lose by waiting several days to see whether the war could be ended without use of the atom bomb. As it happened, Japan's decision to surrender was made before the scale of the Soviet attack on Manchuria, Sakhalin Island, and the Kuril Islands was known, but had the war continued, the Soviets had plans to invade Hokkaido well before the Allied invasion of Kyushu. Tsuyoshi Hasegawa research has led him to conclude that the atomic bombings themselves were not the principal reason for capitulation. Instead, he contends, it was the swift and devastating Soviet victories on the mainland in the week following Stalin's August 8 declaration of war that forced the Japanese message of surrender on August 15, 1945


After the second bomb it still took about a week for them to surrender, so 3 days obviously wasn't enough.
 

9 Pages V  « < 6 7 8 9 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: