Information Overload and Internet Forums, How the Internet is Destroying the Way We Socialize |
Information Overload and Internet Forums, How the Internet is Destroying the Way We Socialize |
*mipadi* |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Guest ![]() |
I have a confession to make: The last time I went on a long trip, I took my
laptop with me. Yes, that's right; even on a trip to Florida, I was still enamored of my "connection" to the world that I brought my laptop. I was staying in a condo, and I was so desperate for information that I piggybacked off another occupant's wireless network. I'd like to think that I'm alone, but the prevalence of technology, especially personal communications devices, in our society, makes me feel as thought I'm not. Look around: It's hard to find someone without a cell phone. It's hard to go to a café and not see a bunch of open laptops. And our obsession with sites like MySpace and Facebook show how much we clamor for even the tiniest bits of information about our friends, coworkers, and yes, even enemies. I go to a café at my university a lot. I'm sometimes amazed how often I see groups of two or three friends sitting around a table, laptops open, headphones on -- not talking to each other. I must admit I am guilty of this as well. And I often wonder how it's affecting our society. My interest in Internet-based communications first grew out of my obsession with Internet forums. Once upon a time, I visited at least a dozen forums a day; I'm proud to say that number is now down to three, and one of them is a software development forum and thus not very social in nature. I noticed a common trend on Internet forums: People bicker and argue and never really seem to get anywhere. Why is that? The Internet is a very impersonal form of communication. It's easy to miss tone and emotion, and such information is completely devoid of body language -- elements that are crucial to human communication, especially when things like sarcasm and irony are involved. Furthermore, Internet communications -- e.g., forum posts -- are often given only a cursory glance. (Evidence? I bet only a few people are going to read this entire essay.) Furthermore, forums are often devoid of any real content. Look at CB, for example: Some of today's active threads include a topic on which CB members you keep in regular contact with (why do I care who you talk to?); "How are you feeling?" (do I really care how most members are feeling?); and "What are you eating/drinking right now?" (self-explanatory why this thread is pointless). It's a common criticism that truly intelligent posts on CB quickly disappear. This, my friends, is "information overload". I'm certainly no stranger to information overload. I used to be addicted to blogs; at my peak, I was checking several dozen RSS feeds a day. On an average day, I probably got several hundred pieces of news, which I insisted on removing from my news feeder by hand. I'm proud to say I've now narrowed that down to only a handful of vital news feeds. I read an essay today called something like "Informed to Death". I have neither the title nor author handy, but the gist is that, on the average day, we come into contact with so much information that we are paralyzed by it; we cannot act on it, because we simply cannot make sense of it. Our world, as a result, has become disordered and chaotic. The author cites the example of medieval Europe. Medieval Europe was very ordered; rightly or wrongly, most people were spiritual, and believed that they were the special creation of a god looking down upon them from the heavens. That specific case of order was destroyed by astronomers who discovered that the Earth was not in fact the center of the universe; we were not special, but rather, just another insignificant planet. Our world was forever changed. I am not condemning science, but rather, showing that our over-reliance on information, our strive to "always be connected", is in fact tearing us apart -- from ourselves, each other, and the world. We're losing our ability to process information. Our world is becoming chaotic, and we're not able to make sense of it. Part of the problem, I feel, is in the nature of personal computing, which is unnatural and confining. We're tethered to desks. But people don't want that; sales of mobile phones and laptops demonstrate that we want to be free. The Apple iPhone is part of my recent inspiration. It is, in many ways, a computer in a phone-sized package. I feel this is the direction that technology must take: We have to move away from bulky devices that deliver entirely too much information, to small devices that set us free, let us interact with other people, with friends and colleagues, with our physical world, while still allowing us some of the connectivity to information which we have come to enjoy and even rely on. No, I'm not promoting the iPhone specifically; it's primitive compared to what I envision. Technology still has a long way to go, especially in the area of display devices, whose resolutions are "fuzzy" compared to our vision. But the building blocks are already in place. Computers are becoming untethered. Computers are moving from computation devices to personal communications devices. Free wireless networks are springing up in major cities. Imagine a world where your life is in your pocket, but you're not bound by such technology; rather, the technnology encourages you to share yourself with others and the rest of the world. A world where we're not bombarded with information; where we don't use thoughtless information consumption as a substitute for human interaction, creativity, and discovery. We are at a crucial juncture in technological development: Will we rule technology, or let it rule us? I hope, for humanity's sake, that we choose to be the masters of technology, and not the other way around. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |