Log In · Register

 
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Female circumcision trial may be first in U.S.
*WHIMSICAL 0NE*
post Oct 28 2006, 03:21 PM
Post #1





Guest






*crosses legs* I thought I'd share.

QUOTE
LAWRENCEVILLE, Georgia (AP) -- The trial of an Atlanta-area father accused of circumcising his 2-year-old daughter with scissors is focusing attention on an ancient African practice that experts say is slowly becoming more common in the U.S. as immigrant communities grow.

Khalid Adem, a 30-year-old immigrant from Ethiopia, is charged with aggravated battery and cruelty to children.

Human rights observers said they believe this is the first criminal case in the U.S. involving the 5,000-year-old practice.

Prosecutors say Adem used scissors to remove his daughter's clitoris in their apartment in 2001. The child's mother said she did not discover it until more than a year later.

"He said he wanted to preserve her virginity," Fortunate Adem, the girl's mother, testified this week. "He said it was the will of God. I became angry in my mind. I thought he was crazy."

The girl, now 7, also testified, clutching a teddy bear and saying that her father "cut me on my private part." Adem cried loudly as his daughter left the courtroom.

Testifying on his own behalf Friday, Adem said he never circumcised his daughter or asked anyone else to do so. He said he grew up in Addis Ababa, the capital of Ethiopia, and considers the practice more prevalent in rural areas.

Adem, who removed a handkerchief from his pocket and cried at one point during his testimony, was asked what he thought of someone who believes in the practice. He replied: "The word I can say is `mind in the gutter.' He is a moron."

His lawyer, Mark Hill, acknowledged that Adem's daughter had been cut. But he implied that the family of Fortunate Adem, who immigrated from South Africa when she was 6, may have had the procedure done.

The Adems divorced in 2003, and Hill suggested that the couple's daughter was encouraged to testify against her father by her mother, who has full custody.

If convicted, Adem, a clerk at a suburban Atlanta gas station, could get up to 40 years in prison.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, using figures from the 1990 Census, estimated that 168,000 girls and women in the U.S. had undergone the procedure or were at risk of being subjected to it.

The State Department estimates that up to 130 million women worldwide had undergone circumcision as of 2001. Knives, razors or even sharp stones are usually used, according to a 2001 department report. The tools often are not sterilized, and often, many girls are circumcised at the same ceremony, leading to infection.

It is unknown how many girls have died from the procedure, either during the cutting or from infections, or years later in childbirth.

Nightmares, depression, shock and feelings of betrayal are common psychological side effects, according to the federal report.

The report estimated that 73 percent of women in Ethiopia had undergone the procedure, based on a 1997 survey.

Taina Bien-Aime, executive director of Equality Now, an international human rights group, said female circumcision is most widely practiced in a 28-country swath of Africa. She said more than 90 percent of women in Ethiopia are believed to have been subjected to the practice, and more in places like Egypt and Somalia.

"It is a preparation for marriage," Bien-Aime said. "If the girl is not circumcised, her chances of being married are very slim."

The practice crosses ethnic and cultural lines and is not tied to a particular religion. Activists say the practice is intended to deny women sexual pleasure. In its most extreme form, the clitoris and parts of the labia are removed and the labia that remain are stitched together.

"I had maybe read about it in Reader's Digest or some other journal, but not really considered it a possibility here," said Dr. Rose Badaruddin, the pediatrician for the Adems' daughter.

Many refugees from Ethiopia and Somalia come to Georgia through a federal refugee resettlement program.

"With immigration, the immigrants travel with their traditions," Bien-Aime said. "Female genital mutilation is not an exception."

Federal law specifically bans the practice, but many states do not have a law addressing it. Georgia lawmakers, with the support of Fortunate Adem, passed an anti-mutilation law last year. Khalid Adem is not being tried under that law, since it did not exist when his daughter's cutting allegedly happened.


Source: CNN.com
 
sprezzatura
post Oct 28 2006, 03:25 PM
Post #2


Peggy.
******

Group: Member
Posts: 2,508
Joined: Aug 2005
Member No: 214,025



Why do girls need circumcision in the first place?

Eww. That is just weird.
 
think!IMAGINARIL...
post Oct 28 2006, 03:49 PM
Post #3


.
*******

Group: Member
Posts: 3,264
Joined: Jan 2004
Member No: 761



Yeah, that's weird.

That's a really weird tradition.
 
Serendipity
post Oct 28 2006, 04:13 PM
Post #4


the bird and the bee sides!
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,697
Joined: Aug 2005
Member No: 201,280



O.o I've only heard of boys being circumcised, but not girls.
 
iDecay
post Oct 28 2006, 04:25 PM
Post #5


Pocketful of Sunshine
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 8,690
Joined: Nov 2005
Member No: 289,004



QUOTE(Serendipity. @ Oct 28 2006, 2:13 PM) *
O.o I've only heard of boys being circumcised, but not girls.

That's the first thing I thought when I saw the topic title. mellow.gif Weird indeed.
 
*WHIMSICAL 0NE*
post Oct 28 2006, 04:59 PM
Post #6





Guest






Yeah, when I first learned about it, I thought it was disgusting. They have an artical about it on wikiepdia...

QUOTE
The sewn-together labia majora are slightly opened before sexual intercourse by the girl's husband — girls will often be married at 12–16 years old — or by his female relatives, whose responsibility it is to inspect the wound every few weeks and open it some more if necessary.

During childbirth, the enlargement is too small to allow vaginal delivery, and so the infibulation must be opened completely and restored after delivery. Once again, the legs are tied together to allow the wound to heal, and the procedure is repeated for each subsequent act of intercourse or childbirth. When childbirth takes place in a hospital, the surgeons may preserve the infibulation by enlarging the vagina with deep episiotomies. Afterwards, the patient may insist that her vagina be closed again so that her husband does not reject her.


Eww. I remember when I first learned about it my teacher said that they would do that and then tie the girls legs together until she got married. sick.gif
 
Simba
post Oct 28 2006, 08:18 PM
Post #7


Photoartist
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 12,363
Joined: Apr 2006
Member No: 399,390



^ Oh yeah, I've heard of things like that before.
I say it's some pretty abnormal stuff.
 
Gigi
post Oct 29 2006, 05:09 AM
Post #8


in a matter of time
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,151
Joined: Aug 2005
Member No: 191,357



Dude, just because you cut her clitoris, doesn't mean you'll be able to preserve her virginity.

Unless he defines losing your virginity as sexual pleasure, but whatever.

Still, that's just cruel, to prevent women from having any sexual pleasure. Makes me glad to live in a place where female sexuality is widely accepted; encouraged, even.
 
datass
post Oct 29 2006, 05:49 AM
Post #9


(′ ・ω・`)
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 6,179
Joined: Dec 2004
Member No: 72,477



Dude, those people are so cruel. So men can have sexual pleasure, but women can't? What the f**k?
 
*a painefull euphoria*
post Nov 14 2006, 08:54 PM
Post #10





Guest






aww god im cringing so badly right now.
i read a book about it last year.
 
me1issaaaa
post Nov 14 2006, 08:57 PM
Post #11



*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 4,066
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 18,393



Yeah, that's the town I grew up in, until last year. It's such a sickening story.
 
OhMyAnniee
post Nov 15 2006, 06:09 PM
Post #12


Senior Member
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,388
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 4,129



Eeeeeeesh.
 
*Infinite.*
post Nov 16 2006, 12:24 PM
Post #13





Guest






Wow, thats bizare. I would never put my daughter or even myself under something like that.

Just thinking about it is wrong.
 
Rachel
post Nov 24 2006, 02:08 AM
Post #14


i've never wanted anything rationale.
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 8,449
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 19,045



Who are we to judge?
 

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: