Moderator Performance, V.2, Suggestions/Complaints/Compliments |
  |
| *kryogenix* |
 Apr 16 2007, 02:17 PM
Post
#501
|
|
Guest  |
The moderating team needs to answer criticisms in a more effective manner.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 16 2007, 02:48 PM
Post
#502
|
|
 Senior Member  Group: Member Posts: 116 Joined: Apr 2007 Member No: 514,820 |
agree, and not be so biased all the time.
|
|
|
|
| *digital.fragrance* |
Apr 16 2007, 02:57 PM
Post
#503
|
|
Guest |
^ Example?
|
|
|
|
| *I Viddy Horrorshow* |
Apr 16 2007, 03:23 PM
Post
#504
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(kryogenix @ Apr 16 2007, 8:17 PM)  The moderating team needs to answer criticisms in a more effective manner. Just because you haven't been satisfied with the responses, doesn't mean that the way the problem has been addressed has been ineffective. |
|
|
|
| *kryogenix* |
Apr 16 2007, 03:26 PM
Post
#505
|
|
Guest |
No, I don't think that's it.
|
|
|
|
| *I Viddy Horrorshow* |
Apr 16 2007, 03:27 PM
Post
#506
|
|
Guest |
Shocking.
|
|
|
|
| *kryogenix* |
Apr 16 2007, 03:32 PM
Post
#507
|
|
Guest |
You're not adding anything to this thread.
|
|
|
|
| *I Viddy Horrorshow* |
Apr 16 2007, 03:35 PM
Post
#508
|
|
Guest |
Whatever. I was just seeking to observe that if you're looking for fault, you'll be able to find it anywhere. But really, your concerns aren't really giving me anything to worry about, so forgive me fo rnot getting all worked up.
But you're right, this is, I think, going to be fairly pointless. Consider the high road taken. |
|
|
|
| *kryogenix* |
Apr 16 2007, 03:41 PM
Post
#509
|
|
Guest |
Good, now send one of your buddies over here to answer my questions.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 16 2007, 03:43 PM
Post
#510
|
|
 Photoartist Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 12,363 Joined: Apr 2006 Member No: 399,390 |
QUOTE(kryogenix @ Apr 16 2007, 4:26 PM) No, I don't think that's it. Ok, please elaborate so that we can better improve the moderating team and improve your experience at createBlog.Or as Mic from the Ring of Blogging would say it: QUOTE(Vendetta @ Apr 16 2007, 4:33 PM) IM IN UR FORUMZ, IMPROVING UR EXPERIENCEZ.
|
|
|
|
| *kryogenix* |
Apr 16 2007, 03:45 PM
Post
#511
|
|
Guest |
You can check back in the warning level thread.
|
|
|
|
| *kryogenix* |
Apr 16 2007, 06:48 PM
Post
#512
|
|
Guest |
also the mods aren't responding in a timely manner
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 16 2007, 07:25 PM
Post
#513
|
|
 i lost weight with Mulder! Group: Official Designer Posts: 4,070 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 79,019 |
because we don't see the point anymore.
|
|
|
|
| *mona lisa* |
Apr 16 2007, 07:27 PM
Post
#514
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(create yourself @ Apr 16 2007, 3:48 PM) agree, and not be so biased all the time. WOW. Amazing criticism. Applause for you, my dear.QUOTE(kryogenix @ Apr 16 2007, 7:48 PM) also the mods aren't responding in a timely manner Why do you think that is? I think they've said what they wanted to say.
|
|
|
|
| *kryogenix* |
Apr 16 2007, 07:33 PM
Post
#515
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(Mulder @ Apr 16 2007, 8:25 PM) because we don't see the point anymore. Then I don't see the point in being a good member if the mods aren't going to entertain my questions. You have until midnight EST to respond. |
|
|
|
|
Apr 16 2007, 07:34 PM
Post
#516
|
|
|
Photoartist Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 12,363 Joined: Apr 2006 Member No: 399,390 |
QUOTE(kryogenix @ Apr 16 2007, 6:13 PM) 2. Explain why the verbal warning was held against me even when it was inadequate by your own admission. QUOTE(Arjuna Capulong @ Apr 16 2007, 6:29 PM) You have a point here. Official createBlog By-Laws on verbal warnings: QUOTE This verbal warning must be clearly stated, including the name of the member to whom it is being issued and the specific offence, both in the thread in question and by means of a personal message (PM). Well hold on. I still think James brought up something worth noting. |
|
|
|
| *mona lisa* |
Apr 16 2007, 07:36 PM
Post
#517
|
|
Guest |
I think it was already stated that Kaycee should've been more clear when giving the verbal warning. A PM should be sent and it should be stated in the thread. It was more than just spamming. Isn't that what this is all about?
If not, forgive me. I slept at 7AM this morning. |
|
|
|
|
Apr 16 2007, 07:42 PM
Post
#518
|
|
|
Photoartist Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 12,363 Joined: Apr 2006 Member No: 399,390 |
Well, James is questioning why the verbal warning is still being held against him even though the verbal warning itself has already been confirmed inadequate.
And according to the Official createBlog By-Laws, a verbal warning must be precise and clear. So then if Kaycee's verbal warning wasn't so, should it still be counted as a verbal warning? Because if not, then James should not have had his warning level raised, but rather, should only have a verbal warning (or arguably, nothing). |
|
|
|
| *mona lisa* |
Apr 16 2007, 07:44 PM
Post
#519
|
|
Guest |
OH. Is that what those 4 pages are about?
James, when/where was your verbal warning given? |
|
|
|
|
Apr 16 2007, 07:45 PM
Post
#520
|
|
|
Photoartist Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 12,363 Joined: Apr 2006 Member No: 399,390 |
QUOTE(mona lisa @ Apr 16 2007, 8:44 PM) OH. Is that what those 4 pages are about? Technically, no. But that's where we are right now.
|
|
|
|
| *kryogenix* |
Apr 16 2007, 08:00 PM
Post
#521
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(mona lisa @ Apr 16 2007, 8:44 PM) OH. Is that what those 4 pages are about? James, when/where was your verbal warning given? I think it was in the anonymous thread, but I can't even be a hundred percent sure it was directed at me! If it was somewhere else, then I dunno. |
|
|
|
| *mona lisa* |
Apr 16 2007, 08:02 PM
Post
#522
|
|
Guest |
Anonymous Shoutouts?
Was/were the reason(s) stated in the PM, then? |
|
|
|
|
Apr 16 2007, 08:06 PM
Post
#523
|
|
|
Photoartist Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 12,363 Joined: Apr 2006 Member No: 399,390 |
Here:
QUOTE(Hakuna Matata @ Apr 13 2007, 1:55 AM) That's ENOUGH, James. This is your verbal warning. Another one of that same racist remark, and your warning level will raised. Whether a PM was sent or not, I don't know.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 16 2007, 08:06 PM
Post
#524
|
|
 Home is where your rump rests! Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,235 Joined: Aug 2006 Member No: 451,969 |
QUOTE(mona lisa @ Apr 16 2007, 5:44 PM) James, when/where was your verbal warning given? QUOTE(Hakuna Matata @ Apr 12 2007, 10:55 PM) That's ENOUGH, James. This is your verbal warning. Another one of that same racist remark, and your warning level will raised. James, here you go: I did not give out a verbal warning via PM. That was a mistake of mine, and I'm sorry. I also was not clear with what reason you were being warned. I did not send out a PM because just two minutes after I issued the verbal warning, you had posted again with the same kind of post you'd been warned not to do and I proceeded with raising your warning level instead of going back to verbally warn you via PM. Again, I should've PM'd you. That is very, very true. I still believe, however, that that verbal warning still has credibility and should still stand as so. The post that James made after being verbally warned in the thread would've received a verbal warning. Then the same thing would've happened, with just one post over. |
|
|
|
| *Duchess of Dork* |
Apr 16 2007, 08:10 PM
Post
#525
|
|
Guest |
That changes things A LOT. I was under the impression that a PM was sent for the verbal warning. It was the content (or lack thereof) that was questioned.
If that's the case, then his warning level really needs to be lowered to that of just a verbal warning. |
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: