multiple scrollbars in an entry, HELP!! Options

[voguelove]

so i run an icon site and i just thought itd be more organized if i had multiple scrollbars per entry. except..i dont know what that code is. does anyone know where i can get the code to that?

example <--as you can see, some of her posts include double scrollbars?

[talcumpowder]

Hit "Edit HTML" before using.

CODE

<div style="width: 200px; height: 250px; overflow: auto;">
STUFF HERE
</div>
<div style="width: 200px; height: 250px; overflow: auto;">
STUFF HERE
</div>

You can copy the code as msny times as you'd like.

[voguelove]

eh..its not working. can you tell me step by step how to use it?

[talcumpowder]

Click "New Weblog Entry".
Find the little check box that says "Edit HTML", if you're using a Mac, this step is irrelevant. Use the link saying "View HTML" to show what it'll look like.
Where it says "STUFF HERE", type in what each box will say. You must have enough content to cause a scrollbar, in this case it's 250px worth - height-wise that is.
After you're done editing, submit the entry.

[voguelove]

for some reason, it doesnt work for me. maybe im doing it wrong? but thanks anyway.

[voguelove]

oh, ok. what if i want to add icons? do i just copy the icon in there or do i have to that image code?

[Kenado]

If you want icons then yes you would put the img tags, only if edit html is clicked, but you'll have to have it cliked anyways.

ex.

CODE

<div style="height:#px; width:#px; overflow:auto;"><img src="URL"></div>

And jut add more img tags if you want to add more icons and such.

[voguelove]

If you want icons then yes you would put the img tags, only if edit html is clicked, but you'll have to have it cliked anyways.

ex.

CODE

<div style="height:#px; width:#px; overflow:auto;"><img src="URL"></div>

And jut add more img tags if you want to add more icons and such.

yes, but it only gives me one scrollbar. ah, this is so confusing. sry if anyone feel frustrating since im not getting it.

[voguelove]

ok nvm. i got it to work on blogring instead. thanks for the help anyway! i guess someone can close this?