new ipod video or nano??, which one is better to you? |
![]() ![]() |
new ipod video or nano??, which one is better to you? |
Oct 15 2005, 01:52 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Heart | broken -Once again. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 260 Joined: Mar 2005 Member No: 109,092 |
i need people who have bought the nano or possibly the video ipod to tell me the pro's and cons?well im stuck in the middle deciding whether i should get a nano or ipod video..i mean i dont need that much memory, or anything but i love the price and memory of the ipod video.. the only thing i do not like about the nano is that it has a small screen..but other than it looks good. but i dont think im going to get videos-but who knows i might, and i dont think i can even reach to what 7,500 songs you know?
|
|
|
|
| *tweeak* |
Oct 15 2005, 12:03 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Guest |
the ipod is a much better deal than the nano
|
|
|
|
Oct 15 2005, 12:31 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() hi. call me linda. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 8,187 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 3,475 |
|
|
|
|
Oct 15 2005, 12:40 PM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() What? ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 709 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 92,823 |
|
|
|
|
Oct 15 2005, 12:43 PM
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 59 Joined: Oct 2005 Member No: 264,617 |
Lol. Well, I'm getting a nano ;o
|
|
|
|
Oct 15 2005, 02:11 PM
Post
#6
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Designer Posts: 4,591 Joined: Dec 2004 Member No: 77,305 |
I'd pick the iPod over the Nano. :/
|
|
|
|
Oct 15 2005, 03:19 PM
Post
#7
|
|
![]() Wow, i dont know whats going on... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 1,439 Joined: Apr 2004 Member No: 10,977 |
Video is thinner then normal ipod, has bigger screen, finally has voice recording and is same price too.But it doesn't have Divx or Xvid support, and has no Fast forward or rewind. Which makes it harder to get movies to work. Unless your willing to convert everything.(videos I mean) to the apple h.320 or something codec. Plus it's screen is smaller then most PVP's. But bigger than most DAP's.
|
|
|
|
Oct 15 2005, 05:33 PM
Post
#8
|
|
![]() cB Assassin ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 10,147 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 7,672 |
^ They still don't have FM Radio I don't think, although they do have Podcase so yeah...
They don't have rewind or fast foreward? Man that must suck. |
|
|
|
Oct 15 2005, 09:10 PM
Post
#9
|
|
![]() bliss. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 735 Joined: Aug 2004 Member No: 41,566 |
i would pick video lol..IMO, nano is just a new version of mini with color display...
|
|
|
|
| *tweeak* |
Oct 16 2005, 12:46 AM
Post
#10
|
|
Guest |
Not having radip isn't a problem for me. I don't listen to radio. I use my ipod in the car in order to avoid listenng to the radio
|
|
|
|
Oct 16 2005, 02:25 PM
Post
#11
|
|
![]() Drowning in Doubt. ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 38 Joined: Oct 2005 Member No: 266,933 |
Well, I guess it depends on what you really need.
I just need something to hold about 400+ songs, to look cool, and be miniature. I have no need for a multitude of songs, like... 1000+ nor videos. I just need something small to carry with me so i can listen to my favorite songs at good times. I dont have time to get videos and/or watch them... I'm getting a Nano. |
|
|
|
Oct 16 2005, 06:48 PM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Argh? ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 745 Joined: Mar 2005 Member No: 109,836 |
for 400 songs u might be able to get a flash memory one.. idk how much a 512mb can hold but it might be enough
|
|
|
|
Oct 18 2005, 06:41 PM
Post
#13
|
|
![]() I'm just a little bit crazy... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 1,119 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 19,760 |
I heard somewhere that if you were gonna invest in a mp3 player, you should get as much memory as you can. Even IF you don't need all say 20gb. [Budget-wise.]
Then again... are you actually gonna use the video function that much? |
|
|
|
| *kryogenix* |
Oct 19 2005, 05:51 AM
Post
#14
|
|
Guest |
Function over form.
|
|
|
|
Oct 22 2005, 12:16 AM
Post
#15
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 833 Joined: Oct 2004 Member No: 57,463 |
You may think you don't need all that memory, but you probably will.
In my case, I got the Mini because I didn't think I'd need more than 1,000 songs and boy, was I wrong. |
|
|
|
Oct 25 2005, 12:03 AM
Post
#16
|
|
![]() durian ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 13,124 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 3,860 |
Personally, I saw the ipod video and it looked like a regular ipod to me, but that it was thinner. For some reason, it felt just as heavy, probably because it's wider than the original ipod. I find it pointless to watch movies on a such a small screen, but things jsut keep getting smaller and smaller nowadays lol.
I already have an iPod nano and personally, I like it mainly because I only care about songs. it holds 1000 songs anyway, which is a lot for me. Plus, it's tiny. :] Although, the ipod video is a definite must-have if you're really into portable devices that hold video. I'll ONLY get an iPod video if they ever UPGRADE it to the point where you can take pictures too. Sorry, but I find it pointless to have pictures, unless you can actually take pictures. Wouldn't that be cool? :] It would also be MUCH cooler if my iPod nano was a phone.. *sigh* if only.. Bleh.. :/ |
|
|
|
Oct 25 2005, 08:24 PM
Post
#17
|
|
|
Heart | broken -Once again. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 260 Joined: Mar 2005 Member No: 109,092 |
QUOTE(Just_Dream @ Oct 24 2005, 9:03 PM) Personally, I saw the ipod video and it looked like a regular ipod to me, but that it was thinner. For some reason, it felt just as heavy, probably because it's wider than the original ipod. I find it pointless to watch movies on a such a small screen, but things jsut keep getting smaller and smaller nowadays lol. I already have an iPod nano and personally, I like it mainly because I only care about songs. it holds 1000 songs anyway, which is a lot for me. Plus, it's tiny. :] Although, the ipod video is a definite must-have if you're really into portable devices that hold video. I'll ONLY get an iPod video if they ever UPGRADE it to the point where you can take pictures too. Sorry, but I find it pointless to have pictures, unless you can actually take pictures. Wouldn't that be cool? :] It would also be MUCH cooler if my iPod nano was a phone.. *sigh* if only.. Bleh.. :/ yeah well i have thought about it, and at first i was sure of getting the ipod video because it has more memory and the price is great..but i have ..well i dont know because i personally dont think i would actually put videos on it..i mainly want sthing for me to listen to music like you said..but i dont know its an urge for me to buy the ipod video b/c its i guess cheap for what its worth -please people dont get mad for what i just said- but yeah for the nano i dont know i seen alot ppl have it now, and i dont why but im digusted on how small it is, i mean i knew it would small but man its itsy bitsy man.. i dont know, im pretty much not making sense right about now ;p but yeah it would be nicer if they had a ipod that took pictures ! |
|
|
|
| *incoherent* |
Oct 25 2005, 08:33 PM
Post
#18
|
|
Guest |
i want the ipod. there was something on channel one (a school program) saying that ipod videos hold 15,000 songs. it seems like a good deal, but i could afford an ipod.
|
|
|
|
Oct 25 2005, 09:59 PM
Post
#19
|
|
![]() skaters gonna skate. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 6,861 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 6,336 |
ipod video
|
|
|
|
Oct 25 2005, 11:18 PM
Post
#20
|
|
![]() cheeeesy like theres no tomorrow ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 3,316 Joined: Aug 2004 Member No: 37,142 |
yea i just saw both of them today at best buy. for 50 bucks more the new ipod is a great deal. but i choose the nano just because its much skinnier and like i need that. it works with me.
but if you want 30 GB i suggest the ipod. its slightly wider and skinnier too. |
|
|
|
Oct 26 2005, 12:12 AM
Post
#21
|
|
![]() durian ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 13,124 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 3,860 |
QUOTE(pandamonium @ Oct 25 2005, 8:18 PM) yea i just saw both of them today at best buy. for 50 bucks more the new ipod is a great deal. but i choose the nano just because its much skinnier and like i need that. it works with me. but if you want 30 GB i suggest the ipod. its slightly wider and skinnier too. My thoughts exactly lol. If someone really wanted to do all that stuff with their iPod, maybe it's better to get the video. It just depends on what one wants to do with their iPod. and to TYPiKALFEMME - It's okay, I'm not mad or anything. Everyone has their own opinions, and I'm very openminded. Some people say it's too small, some say it's amazingly small that they want one. It just depends... I think size does matter though. If I wanted to watch movies, I'd rather have the real deal (dvds) and actually BUY a plasma tv or lcd screen to watch on. I hate watching things on such tiny screens. But if I was so much into wanting to watch things on my iPod, I'd get the video. But that's not me, so yea lol. But I'd say it's a good choice because when yout hink about, for such a great price, it's worth it only because in the past, iPods were so much more expensive for more space, and wasn't in color, nor could it play movies. |
|
|
|
Oct 28 2005, 08:59 PM
Post
#22
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 65 Joined: Oct 2005 Member No: 279,631 |
Let's see.
I'd wait until Apple comes out with a video iPod that plays more formats, or else I'd just get something from another company to play video with. Because at the moment, the iPod seems to primarily be a MP3 player still. However, if it was a choice between the iPod 5G (video) and the Nano, I'd get the iPod, or at least until after the conflict with Apple getting sued over the Nano is over. You see, the screen of the Nano scratches exceptionally easily, because the protective resin on it isn't as thick as the old iPods or the iPod minis. Lawyers have sued Apple for this already, and hopefully soon, Apple will make them with a thicker screen. I haven't been keeping up with that though, so maybe they've already started making them with thicker screens. =/ |
|
|
|
Oct 30 2005, 02:10 PM
Post
#23
|
|
![]() durian ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 13,124 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 3,860 |
^ But I heard it's not for sure.
What I find really ignorant is that people can countlessly complain that the screen scratches easily, when they could easily remove the scratches. I heard Displex (something like that?) and Brasso has removed it. Although, I'm not for sure about Brasso since Tom Dailey says that it does remove it but a few people who tried it said it didn't make it any better, while others said it did. I guess you have a 50/50 chance. Either your nano gets worse or gets better. Secondly, they could always just go back and bring it to the apple store have it checked out. Yes the screen gets scratched. It seems like the glossy feel of the nano is much different from the mini, although it's claimed to be the same. Who knows? Half of the people don't believe that it's made from the same plastic-coating, the other half don't believe that there's the same amout of coating--that there's less coating. Thirdly, if the screen gets cracked or scratched to the point where the screen isn't viewable, I believe the warranty can take into effect. Just don't call the customer support--you'll be wasting a call. there's supposively a lawsuit about this, but personally I think people are taking this WAY out of proportion. People tend to exaggerate, saying "OMG IT SCRATCHED SO EASILY AND ALL I DID WAS PUT IT IN MY POCKET!" Well no DUH it scratches easily. That's why you get a SCREEN PROTECTOR, shield/skin, and/or case. My nano's scratched on the back, but not on the front. I'm glad becuase I've been taking precautions. :] |
|
|
|
Oct 30 2005, 02:21 PM
Post
#24
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 479 Joined: Sep 2005 Member No: 223,199 |
Well, I'm getting the Ipod Nano since the new Ipod does not work with my computer. Plus, I don't need all that other suff the new Ipod comes with. The nano hold 1000 songs...good enough for me! Plus, it's really tiny, so it can fit in my pocket. For me, the nano is the best choice.
|
|
|
|
Oct 31 2005, 01:06 AM
Post
#25
|
|
|
Heart | broken -Once again. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 260 Joined: Mar 2005 Member No: 109,092 |
man im still confused; i really do want the nano but im just paranoid & scared for the fact that i could or might be one of those people who do have the screen scratched up..then end up wasting my money on it. but i have my mind switching back and forth over the nano and the new ipod video..personally i really dont care for the video capability. But what i love about the new ipod is, the memory storage + the price is great for it. I'm just going back&forth to get the nano or not, i wonder if i do get the nano and get a case like this CASE..do you think it'll protect it? Sigh. Apple should make a new version of the nano, so the screen isnt so sensitive then people wouldnt be as paranoid as me. A pro for them is, they probably wont get anymore lawsuits..haha okay dont mind me..
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |