approved by-laws, Edit v2 =) |
  |
 Jan 21 2007, 02:52 PM
Post
#76
|
|
 Photoartist  Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 12,363 Joined: Apr 2006 Member No: 399,390  |
QUOTE(MiSSxMELON @ Jan 20 2007, 12:04 PM)  So to even qualify for any sort of position, you have to maintain a high PPD? Well, it's something that's looked at, but any of these requirements can be overlooked if the person is exceptionally qualified.
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 21 2007, 03:04 PM
Post
#77
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 211 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 9,257 |
When you say exceptionally qualified, what specifically do you mean? (This is out of curiosity.)
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 21 2007, 03:16 PM
Post
#78
|
|
 i lost weight with Mulder! Group: Official Designer Posts: 4,070 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 79,019 |
well, for example, dani (and me, also) were added as lj staff both when are ppd were below 5, because we were both deemed exceptionally qualified in livejournal.
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 21 2007, 03:17 PM
Post
#79
|
|
|
Photoartist Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 12,363 Joined: Apr 2006 Member No: 399,390 |
Well, for People Staff, it usually means something like even if your PPD is low, but if you prove that you're regularly active within the forums, you will probably have a better chance. I would think this would usually be in the case of an older member having a long hiatus and then coming back, finding their PPD much lower.
For Design Staff it could mean something like if they help around the Resource Center often and do a good job of answering questions. Since the PPD is usually as a reference of a person's activity (though not necessarily completely accurate). I know PPD isn't the only requirement, but it seems to be the only one that you actually have to maintain yourself. |
|
|
|
|
Jan 21 2007, 04:21 PM
Post
#80
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 211 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 9,257 |
That makes sense. Thanks. :)
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: