Leniency my ass |
Leniency my ass |
Oct 25 2007, 05:13 PM
Post
#51
|
|
Senior Member Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 2,223 Joined: Dec 2006 Member No: 485,356 |
I 'farted' on Diana because she bumped the topic. So, I didn't deviate.
Although, I did close it at first. Anyway, it doesn't matter. People are actually commenting about how old the topic is. I don't see any out of hand spam in there. |
|
|
Oct 25 2007, 05:14 PM
Post
#52
|
|
Senior Member Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,095 Joined: Jul 2005 Member No: 171,080 |
It doesn't pertain to the topic, does it? NOPE!
Here, let me have a chance at quoting some Community Guidelines: QUOTE Anything not pertaining or contributing to the topic (i.e., "South Park is the bestest show ever, no?" in a topic about, say, Myspace codes) mmhmm |
|
|
Oct 25 2007, 05:18 PM
Post
#53
|
|
Senior Member Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 2,223 Joined: Dec 2006 Member No: 485,356 |
You don't always have to be on topic. I'm talking about ugly spam. One word spam. NOTHING TO DO WITH spam.
Again, the problem was resolved so I don't see why it should remain open. BUT if Trish wants it open, fine. As long as it doesn't get out of hand. |
|
|
Oct 25 2007, 05:19 PM
Post
#54
|
|
Senior Member Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,095 Joined: Jul 2005 Member No: 171,080 |
Wouldn't this be the same as some Design Staff closing a topic after someone posts the answer, but the starter not coming by to say it can be closed?
|
|
|
Oct 25 2007, 05:22 PM
Post
#55
|
|
Senior Member Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,095 Joined: Jul 2005 Member No: 171,080 |
Oh I get it. I bump a topic and it gets closed because I'm not a superior anymore. How long did it take you to come up with an excuse to close it?
|
|
|
Oct 25 2007, 05:23 PM
Post
#56
|
|
Senior Member Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 2,223 Joined: Dec 2006 Member No: 485,356 |
If the answer was already provided, I don't see why we need the OP's approval.
Spencer, you still don't get it. |
|
|
Oct 25 2007, 05:26 PM
Post
#57
|
|
Senior Member Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,095 Joined: Jul 2005 Member No: 171,080 |
Ok, so let's try this again.
|
|
|
Oct 25 2007, 05:27 PM
Post
#58
|
|
Senior Member Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 2,223 Joined: Dec 2006 Member No: 485,356 |
I closed it. You know why. -grabs a bottle of water-
|
|
|
Oct 25 2007, 05:27 PM
Post
#59
|
|
Senior Member Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,095 Joined: Jul 2005 Member No: 171,080 |
Why? What rule did it break?
|
|
|
Oct 25 2007, 05:30 PM
Post
#60
|
|
Senior Member Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 2,223 Joined: Dec 2006 Member No: 485,356 |
The 'problem' he had was yeaarrrs ago. And I'm sure Ju-sun already solved it.
|
|
|
Oct 25 2007, 05:32 PM
Post
#61
|
|
Senior Member Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,095 Joined: Jul 2005 Member No: 171,080 |
I'd like to see the rule that states we can make up rules as we go.
|
|
|
Oct 25 2007, 05:33 PM
Post
#62
|
|
Senior Member Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 2,223 Joined: Dec 2006 Member No: 485,356 |
It isn't a rule. It's logic.
|
|
|
Oct 25 2007, 05:34 PM
Post
#63
|
|
Senior Member Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,095 Joined: Jul 2005 Member No: 171,080 |
It's also logic to allow me to post in whatever topic I want, regardless of what my member title says.
|
|
|
Oct 25 2007, 05:35 PM
Post
#64
|
|
Senior Member Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 2,223 Joined: Dec 2006 Member No: 485,356 |
True.
But as long as you don't spam and follow the rules, you're good to go. |
|
|
Oct 25 2007, 05:36 PM
Post
#65
|
|
Senior Member Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,095 Joined: Jul 2005 Member No: 171,080 |
Ok, then what the fuck was wrong with me posting about a time I was locked out?
EXACTLY! |
|
|
Oct 25 2007, 05:37 PM
Post
#66
|
|
Senior Member Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 2,223 Joined: Dec 2006 Member No: 485,356 |
Because the topic was in the morgue and it was already answered.
|
|
|
Oct 25 2007, 05:38 PM
Post
#67
|
|
٩(͡๏̯͡๏)۶ Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 14,309 Joined: Nov 2004 Member No: 65,593 |
Spencer just shut the fuck up already idiot. Stop acting like a fucking douche. Go get laid, and quit bitching.
|
|
|
Oct 25 2007, 05:40 PM
Post
#68
|
|
Senior Member Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,095 Joined: Jul 2005 Member No: 171,080 |
I'll remember that, Tongue.
|
|
|
Oct 25 2007, 05:44 PM
Post
#69
|
|
Senior Member Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 2,223 Joined: Dec 2006 Member No: 485,356 |
Spencer, could you please stop bumping old topics? I understand what you mean but I don't agree with it. Not in this case.
If Trish wants the topic re-opened, she'll f**king get it as long as it doesn't resort into unnecessary spam. Doesn't that do it for you? |
|
|
Oct 25 2007, 05:45 PM
Post
#70
|
|
Tick tock, Bill Group: Administrator Posts: 8,764 Joined: Dec 2005 Member No: 333,948 |
My goodness. LOL
The old topic that Diana bumped *was* closed. I mentioned in this topic that it really didn't need to be. I had said that because it seemed like people were reminiscing and didn't see why it needed to be closed. This whole bumped topic thing isn't a big deal. If someone has something relevant or fun to chat about and bumps a topic, it's not the end of the world, especially if people are participating and what not. I would have left the locked out one open but might have been inclined to close the xanga one, simply because it was a xanga related question that had obviously been answered, as opposed to the other two which were pretty open ended. I know it's not important, just giving my two cents. |
|
|
Oct 25 2007, 05:48 PM
Post
#71
|
|
Cornflakes :D Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,541 Joined: Dec 2005 Member No: 322,923 |
I'll agree with Rebecca, I suppose it really isn't that big of a deal, but I know there is something somewhere about bumping topics, because when I first joined I swear the god I use to always have it shoved in my face about not bumping topics that are way old. But I honestly don't care, there is a thing about creating new topics though if it is a duplicate then its fine if its 6 months old.. *shrug
Oh also Spencer, just to let you know. The un-moved really old topics were probably in the appropriate place but when Ju-sun put the back up on here after Suzzette removed the forums a lot of things were put in the wrong places...and well were still moving them all. |
|
|
Oct 25 2007, 05:50 PM
Post
#72
|
|
i did your boyfriend Group: Official Designer Posts: 3,335 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 4,071 |
tung, shut up.
i dont care. i was kind of irritated when it was closed but it's not like it matters anymore. I will say this. If you are going to enforce the rules at that kind of level or extent, Sandra, please enforce it that way consistently. You posted in a thread from 2004 that someone bumped for no reason at all and didnt even think about closing it? With your logic, Tal_dara already went on his break, in fact he's been on a 2 year break, and so the "issue" was over with. Please give us a reason as to why it was not closed right away. |
|
|
Oct 25 2007, 05:50 PM
Post
#73
|
|
Senior Member Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,095 Joined: Jul 2005 Member No: 171,080 |
I'll agree with Rebecca, I suppose it really isn't that big of a deal, but I know there is something somewhere about bumping topics, because when I first joined I swear the god I use to always have it shoved in my face about not bumping topics that are way old. But I honestly don't care, there is a thing about creating new topics though if it is a duplicate then its fine if its 6 months old.. *shrug You cared 5 minutes ago. |
|
|
Oct 25 2007, 05:52 PM
Post
#74
|
|
Cornflakes :D Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,541 Joined: Dec 2005 Member No: 322,923 |
Look, I'm trying to agree here with you as much as possible.
You can have your way with whatever it is you want o_O I'm not really going to care that much about something so stupid. This is ridiculous that we have to argue over something so simple that can be fixed. |
|
|
*Steven* |
Oct 25 2007, 06:05 PM
Post
#75
|
Guest |
I 'farted' on Diana because she bumped the topic. So, I didn't deviate. Although, I did close it at first. Anyway, it doesn't matter. People are actually commenting about how old the topic is. I don't see any out of hand spam in there. People were actually conversing in Trish' thread. Fail. If the answer was already provided, I don't see why we need the OP's approval. Spencer, you still don't get it. According to you Sandra, no one gets it. If we don't get it, care to explain it to us? That's like going to a class and the professor giving you the question and telling you to answer without telling them what to do. Fail. It isn't a rule. It's logic. Nah, Michelle's already called this one out. It's an unwritten rule. Fail. True. But as long as you don't spam and follow the rules, you're good to go. Hypocrite. Fail. Spencer just shut the fuck up already idiot. Stop acting like a fucking douche. Go get laid, and quit bitching. Tung shut the fuck up. You really shouldn't try to jump into these argument, you always have such horrible retorts. Look, I'm trying to agree here with you as much as possible. You can have your way with whatever it is you want o_O I'm not really going to care that much about something so stupid. This is ridiculous that we have to argue over something so simple that can be fixed. Let's not pull a Suzzette and try to use tact and agree with everything being said. Be yourself. If you think we should shut the fuck up, tell us. Don't hide things and agree for the sake of agreement. |
|
|