Log In · Register

 
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Obama is illegally seizing private businesses., This is Unconstitutional.
illriginal
post May 25 2009, 10:52 AM
Post #1


Senior Member
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 6,349
Joined: Aug 2006
Member No: 455,274



http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/11287


QUOTE
This just gets worse and worse, folks. Except for a few of us, no one out there seems to be reporting the facts. Fear of the Dictator Obama (he appears to be more like Stalin than Hugo Chavez) is on the rise. Soon to be Obama-owned (under the cover of his government-takeovers) private sector business executives, workers, small business owners and even elected Congressional representatives and senators--from both sides of the aisle--are running scared of the despot-usurper.

As it becomes more obvious that the Obama is--in fact--destroying the country to rebuild it in his own image (with all of us now working for him--not ourselves and/or our families), more and more people are cowering in what they hope will be the cover of shadows. Every day, Obama is on television--at least once/day--telling us what he is and will be doing. These items include unconstitutional activities and others that are patently against the laws of the United States of America. For example, under the US Constitution neither he nor any other POTUS has the authority to seize and nationalize private industry. But, he has. Obama does not have the authority to seize any private business. But, he seems to be doing just that.

Obama has seized both General Motors and Chrysler and essentially handed them to the UAW. He is closing down multiple Chrysler agencies. Jim Anderer owns--soon to be past-tense--a highly successful and high-performing Chrysler agency on Long Island. Anderer has been advised that his agency is going to be seized by the new ownership--as we already know this is Barack Hussein Obama. Other Chrysler agencies on Long Island are documented to not be fairing nearly as well. However, many of them--the “Obama-okayed” ones--are still planned to be in business.

Despite multiple letters, emails and phones calls, Anderer has been given no explanation as to why his dealership was targeted. On Neil Cavuto’s show, Anderer said “They won’t give us a solid explanation. They come up with all these reasons, but none of them seem to make sense” and “but I think there is a lot of favored dealers, there is some collusion.” Anderer continued with: “This is insanity. [b]The government is stealing my business
. Well, I cannot accept that as a patriotic American. I was raised in this country to believe that if I work hard and I achieve what I was going after—and I did! I did it! I got it, and now all of a sudden because, you know, we have a president who pushes Chrysler into bankruptcy and puts all of the UAW workers out...? Didn’t have to. Maybe some would have to go out but not all of them, okay. This doesn’t happen in America. This is still America, I think. I mean, this isn’t Stalinist Russia. This is not Nazi Germany where the troopers say you’re out and their buddies are in. That’s what I’m faced with.” The problem here is that America has become a Stalinist Amerika.

The next story of a Chrysler dealership being stolen from its rightful owner is that of George C. Joseph--the sole owner of Sunshine Dodge-Isuzu in Melbourne, FL. Joseph writes: “On Thursday, May 14, 2009 I was notified that my Dodge franchise, that we purchased, will be taken away from my family on June 9, 2009 without compensation and given to another dealer at no cost to them. My new vehicle inventory consists of 125 vehicles with a financed balance of 3 million dollars. This inventory becomes impossible to sell with no factory incentives beyond June 9, 2009. Without the Dodge franchise we can no longer sell a new Dodge as “new,” nor will we be able to do any warranty service work. Additionally, my Dodge parts inventory, (approximately $300,000.) is virtually worthless without the ability to perform warranty service. There is no offer from Chrysler to buy back the vehicles or parts inventory.”

The above are only two stories of a likely growing number of businesses that are now being stolen out from under their rightful owners. The full weight and power of the US federal government is now being brought to bear against We-the-People. Along with stealing our money by taking over the banks, Obama is now also openly stealing the livelihoods from the American people. It is both against the law and demonstrates--proves--that the USA is now under a full and expanding dictatorship! With no one doing anything to stop Obama and his power-mad minions, it will get far worse.

People are now finally asking--that is screaming--"What has happened to America?” and George C. Joseph writes: “HOW IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CAN THIS HAPPEN?” It happens when our lawmakers ignore the laws of the land when they are no longer convenient to their personal purposes and ambitions. It happens when people stop paying attention to the business of our country and our elected officials. It happened when people refused to listen to what Obama actually said, in favor of granting him rock-idol status. It happens when people do nothing to stop it. Tyranny can only prosper when We-the-People allow a dictator to rise up and take over.

The USA and its people are coming close to being totally owned and operated by Obama--who is now going against and bypassing his own leftist Congress. It is being reported that Obama will announce, today, that he will not only close Gitmo--which was voted down Wednesday (90-6) by both Senate Democrats and Republicans--but, WILL release some of the terrorists into the US population.

Tyranny is now the USA’s reality, with Totalitarianism as its form of government. It has arrived and may prove to be the fastest turnaround ever from the most free of all countries to the most oppressed. Was this the change you voted for? Was it? [/b]





The news is legitimate... Obama has in fact began seizing privately owned businesses.









 
illriginal
post May 25 2009, 10:53 AM
Post #2


Senior Member
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 6,349
Joined: Aug 2006
Member No: 455,274



Here's an example that happened in my home state:

QUOTE
RUSH: All right, now, Obama, Carol Browner. This benevolent administration wants to "work with the auto companies," right? Last night Neil Cavuto interviewed Jim Anderer. He is a Chrysler dealer who's been shut down. Cavuto said, "Long Island, New York, Chrysler dealer Jim Anderer says that they're shutting them down even though his dealership is making them a lot of money. They shouldn't be shutting you down, Jim. What did they say in their letter to you?"

ANDERER: They won't give us a solid explanation. They come up with all these reasons, but none of them seem to make sense.

CAVUTO: Well, what were the reasons?

ANDERER: Well, they'll say they want to combine all the stores, or they say that the dealers cost the manufacturer money to keep in business. And all of these might be true in some cases, but in the dealers that they cut, there seems to be no cohesive way that they did it. There was no process that you could put your finger on and say, "Hey, we cut 25% of the lowest performing dealers." They didn't do that, okay? Nobody will give us a real clear explanation or formula that they came up with.

RUSH: Now, why do you think that might be? I mean, I could only hazard a guess here. Do you think that the Obama administration -- "working with" Chrysler, heh, heh, heh; working with the automobile manufacturers, working with the dealers -- they're just randomly taking a look at a list and saying, "Eh, we don't need this one in Long Island, chop it. We don't need that one in Portland, chop it. We don't need that one in San Antonio, chop it"? Do you think they're doing that, or do you think maybe...? I just throw this out there as a possibility. Do you think maybe Obama and his administration are targeting dealerships that happen to be run and owned by Republicans? I don't know this.

I'm being led to speculate because Mr. Anderer says he doesn't know why his high-performing dealership was shut down, and he can't find a formula. He can't find a coherent plan to explain why they're shutting down successful dealerships in the Chrysler network. (interruption) Well, you joke about it being about penalizing success, but what the hell... That would be the theme of this administration: "We're going to penalize success." By the way, coming up later in the program, the details of this: how many of you are paying your home mortgage on time and have been, and have learned that you are also going to be subsidizing people who shouldn't have gotten a mortgage in the first place? (interruption) All right. Snerdley raises his hand.

How many of you pay your credit card bills on time? How many of you pay them off every 30 days? Guess what? You're going to be penalized. People who pay off their credit cards in 30 days, there's a series of things that are going to happen to you. You know, you get a lot of perks and a lot of points and frequent flier miles and maybe cash-back privileges and so forth. All that, or a lot of that that, is going to be eliminated. In addition they're going to start charging you interest from the day you make the purchase rather than 25 or 30 days after you make the purchase. You know why this is being done? I just said that even for those of you who pay off your credit cards in 30 days, to escape any interest or finance charges, some of these companies are going to start charging...

I don't know the names of which ones yet but some of these finance companies and banks that run credit cards, are going to start charging interest on your purchase from the day you make the purchase, not give you a three-week or four-week grace period before they start the finance charges. Now, do you know why they're doing this? They're doing this to help you subsidize the people that don't pay, the people that run late, the people that don't pay their bills on time. And it's going to lower their interest rates. Now, you think that we joke when we say this is an attack on achievers? That this administration is targeting the achievers? You pay your mortgage on time; you're going to subsidize those who shouldn't have been given one in the first place.
You pay your credit cards off on time -- even if you pay them off on time with the minimum payment -- you're still going to have additional payments attached so that the people who are delinquent have an easier time of it. This is a theme of this administration. This is just another way of redistributing wealth, and this is a way that is hidden, and I doubt that too many people are going to find about it 'til the practice is implemented and you start getting your bills. We have some more sound bites here with Jim Anderer, the Chrysler dealer out on Long Island. Cavuto said, "Well, look you think they have it out for the personally, Jim? If you can't find out why they're shutting you down."

ANDERER: No, no, no. But I think there is a lot of favored dealers, there is some collusion.

CAVUTO: Do you know unequivocally of dealers who are pathetic, who are not getting it done, who have been saved?

ANDERER: Yes.

CAVUTO: Can you name them?

ANDERER: Yes. I -- I don't want to do that because, you know, a lot of these guys are friends of mine. But, you know, the numbers are there. The numbers reveal that. Okay? Right on Long Island, there's some guys who really shouldn't be there. But I'm not going to reveal their names.

RUSH: So Cavuto says, "Okay, so this doesn't work for you, right? You're done?"

ANDERER: This is insanity. The government is stealing my business. Well, I cannot accept that as a patriotic American. I was raised in this country to believe that if I work hard and I achieve what I was going after -- and I did! I did it! I got it, and now all of a sudden because, you know, we have a president who pushes Chrysler into bankruptcy and puts all of the UAW workers out...? Didn't have to. Maybe some would have to go out but not all of them, okay. This doesn't happen in America. This is still America, I think. I mean, this isn't Stalinist Russia. This is not Nazi Germany where the troopers say you're out and their buddies are in. That's what I'm faced with.

RUSH: That's a Chrysler dealer, folks, Jim Anderer in Long Island, comparing what's happening to him to Stalinist Russia and Nazi Germany. He believed in the American dream. He went for it; he got it. Now they want to take it away from him. And this is why more and more people think they're not safe, that if the government targets them and their wealth -- the things that they have achieved -- that they're going to have it taken away from them, under some auspices of goodwill for everybody else. Now, this is one segment here, but this is the Chrysler dealers. I know of a dealer out in Portland, and the same thing has happened to him, a leading dealer. They're being shut down and they're being left to eat the inventory that they have on their lot. Furthermore, the dealer in Portland was told some months ago, "Please take additional inventory from the factory. You're going to be okay. We'll back you up." They did it, and they're saddled now with inventory that they're not going to be able to sell that's gonna wipe 'em out financially. All brought to you by the Obama administration.


I heard this on the radio and I felt almost sick to my stomach that all this shit is happening.
 
mipadi
post May 25 2009, 11:10 AM
Post #3


Senior Member
******

Group: Administrator
Posts: 2,648
Joined: Apr 2008
Member No: 639,265



QUOTE(illriginal @ May 25 2009, 11:53 AM) *
Here's an example that happened in my home state:
I heard this on the radio and I felt almost sick to my stomach that all this shit is happening.


QUOTE(illmortal @ Mar 27 2009, 11:57 AM) *
Anyways, Socialism in my opinion is the perfect political and economic system.


These seem to be contradictory statements.
 
illriginal
post May 25 2009, 11:22 AM
Post #4


Senior Member
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 6,349
Joined: Aug 2006
Member No: 455,274



No... lol that is not Socialism. This is on a Communist level.

And look at the major leagues... baseball, football, soccer, basketball... their "draft" system is a socialism system.


This is beyond socialism by a long shot.
 
mipadi
post May 25 2009, 11:34 AM
Post #5


Senior Member
******

Group: Administrator
Posts: 2,648
Joined: Apr 2008
Member No: 639,265



QUOTE(illriginal @ May 25 2009, 12:22 PM) *
No... lol that is not Socialism. This is on a Communist level.

Not really. Socialism is an economic system in which people, via the state, own the means of production.
 
illriginal
post May 25 2009, 11:37 AM
Post #6


Senior Member
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 6,349
Joined: Aug 2006
Member No: 455,274



Ok and... what state does Obama represent? This is GOVERNMENT owned. All these bail outs are "buy outs"... Bail out is a blanket statement, a facade.

The federal level is seizing under Obama.

This is not Socialism. This is Communism.


Show me the Governor of any state that's doing the seizing or "bail outs".
 
mipadi
post May 25 2009, 11:51 AM
Post #7


Senior Member
******

Group: Administrator
Posts: 2,648
Joined: Apr 2008
Member No: 639,265



QUOTE(illriginal @ May 25 2009, 12:37 PM) *
Ok and... what state does Obama represent?

Show me the Governor of any state that's doing the seizing or "bail outs".

"State" refers to a country. From Merriam-Webster: "a nation or territory considered as an organized political community under one government". In general terms, when one talks about "the state", one is referring to a country.

(Because of the US's federal system, a "state" sometimes refers to a specific entity, e.g. Pennsylvania, but that's not the case in this context, where "state" refers to the general term for a nation.)
 
illriginal
post May 25 2009, 12:08 PM
Post #8


Senior Member
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 6,349
Joined: Aug 2006
Member No: 455,274



Ok... but this country has states with their own governments. Give me an example in which Socialism has bought out industries. This nation couldn't even be a socialist nation with the federal level and state level governments + nation's government.. it's one or the other.

Buying out industries for government ownership is on a Communist level.

Communism:
1. a theory or system of social organization based on the holding of all property in common, actual ownership being ascribed to the community as a whole or to the state.
2. (often initial capital letter) a system of social organization in which all economic and social activity is controlled by a totalitarian state dominated by a single and self-perpetuating political party.


IF anything, it's Marxism. A mixture of socialism and communism. I'm a Socialist and I totally disagree with the way Obama is handling this. The very action of "buying out" industries is on a Communist level, nonetheless.
 

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: