AM I THE ONLY ONE WHO HAS NOTICED?! |
  |
 Sep 2 2009, 10:30 PM
Post
#1
|
|
 Senior Member  Group: Official Designer Posts: 5,880 Joined: Nov 2007 Member No: 593,382  |
I think another minor Y2K has occurred. or is about to occur. There have been various reports here and there that I have seen that made the year on people computers say 1969. I believe Mipadi, you said you had this problem? and I saw it on various other forums. And now tj's time thread and other crap happening.
What going down? |
|
|
|
|
Sep 3 2009, 06:00 AM
Post
#2
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Official Member Posts: 1,288 Joined: Oct 2007 Member No: 585,380 |
2012, I'm telling you all now! lol
QUOTE(jcp @ Sep 2 2009, 11:30 PM)  I think another minor Y2K has occurred. or is about to occur. There was a previous Y2K?! |
|
|
|
|
Sep 3 2009, 07:35 AM
Post
#3
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Official Member Posts: 1,574 Joined: Aug 2007 Member No: 555,438 |
It's a problem with MAC OSX. LOL
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 3 2009, 09:20 AM
Post
#4
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Administrator Posts: 2,648 Joined: Apr 2008 Member No: 639,265 |
I'm not sure what you're getting at. Do you mean the occasions on which you might have copied a file from another machine, and the date created reads December 31, 1969? That's because the computer on which the file was created uses a different timestamping mechanism that other file systems won't understand. This often happens when copying files from Windows to a Unix-based system, since FAT and NTFS use a rather different way to store creation times.
Longer Explanation On Unix, time is stored as a 32-bit signed integer ("signed" meaning it can store positive and negative values) that represents the number of seconds since the Unix epoch, which was January 1, 1970 at midnight. But if the file system can't interpret the creation date, it uses -1 as the creation date. In Unix time, -1 is one second prior to the Unix epoch, which is December 31, 1969 at 11:59:59 PM. |
|
|
|
|
Sep 3 2009, 09:24 AM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Official Designer Posts: 5,880 Joined: Nov 2007 Member No: 593,382 |
Nope. I have seen tons of threads on other sites of people complaining that the clock on their computer (some people on a mac some on a pc) had the year changed to 1969.
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 3 2009, 09:27 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Administrator Posts: 2,648 Joined: Apr 2008 Member No: 639,265 |
QUOTE(jcp @ Sep 3 2009, 10:24 AM) Nope. I have seen tons of threads on other sites of people complaining that the clock on their computer (some people on a mac some on a pc) had the year changed to 1969. It's probably due to a similar reason. |
|
|
|
|
Sep 3 2009, 08:37 PM
Post
#7
|
|
 /人◕‿‿◕人\ Group: Official Member Posts: 8,283 Joined: Dec 2007 Member No: 602,927 |
unix time, will be massive problem in about 20 years
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 3 2009, 10:06 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Administrator Posts: 2,648 Joined: Apr 2008 Member No: 639,265 |
QUOTE(Buttsex @ Sep 3 2009, 09:37 PM) unix time, will be massive problem in about 20 years 30 years (2038). |
|
|
|
|
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: