Log In · Register

 

Debate Rules

Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.

Debate.

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
laws too strict?
sporadic
post Dec 2 2004, 09:54 PM
Post #26


and they say imitation is flattering
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,337
Joined: Jul 2004
Member No: 27,269



unobeying = disobeying

Yeah, well. Teenagers on phones. Driving cars. Without seatbelts.
 
lovescream
post Dec 2 2004, 10:00 PM
Post #27


define our lives for us.
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 11,656
Joined: Aug 2004
Member No: 43,293



a lot of people do that.
why did they have to make the law? it's kind of silly and.. stupid.
and uhh thanks for the disobeying thing.. forgot that was a word.
 
randomtkk
post Dec 2 2004, 10:17 PM
Post #28


Senior Member
***

Group: Member
Posts: 54
Joined: Dec 2004
Member No: 68,249



if laws are not strict
why do we need them?
 
lovescream
post Dec 2 2004, 10:43 PM
Post #29


define our lives for us.
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 11,656
Joined: Aug 2004
Member No: 43,293



LOL good question...
we need'em for our protection, but some people get outta hand [me] about it.
 
Spirited Away
post Dec 2 2004, 10:51 PM
Post #30


Quand j'étais jeune...
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 6,826
Joined: Jan 2004
Member No: 1,272



QUOTE(Spiritedfreak @ Dec 2 2004, 10:00 PM)
a lot of people do that.
why did they have to make the law? it's kind of silly and.. stupid.
and uhh thanks for the disobeying thing.. forgot that was a word.

Good job on the topic change.

I forget what states have banned talking on cellphons while driving, does anyone want to supply that info?

I would guess that the states that have banned that would have a lot of traffic in their cities.
 
ComradeRed
post Dec 2 2004, 10:57 PM
Post #31


Dark Lord of McCandless
******

Group: Member
Posts: 2,226
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,761



States don't have the power to ban cell phones on roads (other than the Interstates) I don't believe... that would be up to local townships.
 
lovescream
post Dec 2 2004, 11:02 PM
Post #32


define our lives for us.
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 11,656
Joined: Aug 2004
Member No: 43,293



QUOTE(uninspiredfae @ Dec 2 2004, 10:51 PM)
Good job on the topic change.

I forget what states have banned talking on cellphons while driving, does anyone want to supply that info?

I would guess that the states that have banned that would have a lot of traffic in their cities.

my state: NJ
[personal info]
i heard it on the news.
and nobody said a word about it.. but they still use cellphones on the road.
I SEE PEOPLE!
what's the point of banning cellphones on the road if nobody's going to follow it?
 
azn_r4pf4n
post Dec 3 2004, 12:21 AM
Post #33


The Secret Hacker.
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,780
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 18,712



QUOTE(sporadic @ Dec 2 2004, 6:54 PM)
Yeah, well. Teenagers on phones. Driving cars. Without seatbelts.

lol. teenagers on phones.
 
ComradeRed
post Dec 3 2004, 06:53 AM
Post #34


Dark Lord of McCandless
******

Group: Member
Posts: 2,226
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,761



QUOTE(Spiritedfreak @ Dec 2 2004, 11:02 PM)
my state: NJ
[personal info]
i heard it on the news.
and nobody said a word about it.. but they still use cellphones on the road.
I SEE PEOPLE!
what's the point of banning cellphones on the road if nobody's going to follow it?

There is none. It's like banning drugs. All it does is cause people to disrespect the law, and has almost no positive benefits for society.

If it's not a crime with a victim other than yourself, it's not a crime. Period.
 
sporadic
post Dec 4 2004, 01:36 AM
Post #35


and they say imitation is flattering
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,337
Joined: Jul 2004
Member No: 27,269



Around here they're concentrating more on getting people to wear their seatbelts.
 
lovescream
post Dec 5 2004, 02:59 AM
Post #36


define our lives for us.
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 11,656
Joined: Aug 2004
Member No: 43,293



for my place it's "If a police catches you without a seatbelt on the highway, you get consquences[sp?]"
And for NY is HAVE TO WEAR A SEATBELT O_O
 
angel-roh
post Dec 6 2004, 08:40 PM
Post #37


i'm susan
********

Group: Official Member
Posts: 13,875
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 5,029



I didnt like the part when they had to make all the year birth, 1990 and above to get their permit/driver license at the age of 18. Even though I born in the year 1988. I thought 1990 and above HAVE TO get their driver license at 18 was a bad idea -_-. I miss the times when you have to be 16 to get driver license! I also hate that since Bush is a president...if you fail the WASL test, then you have to take this one class for 4 years. I say that sucks BAD! I think Washington State Law is worse for me... Sigh I thought wrong about Bush. Actually I didn't even like him at all and he's not giving any freedom to our land. He's trying to kill millions of people right now. So far more than thousands of people had died, now he's sending more soldiers to the Iraq War. The only reason I didn't like about John Kerry was that he wanted to make gay marriages legal. I didn't like the gay marriages part. If only, Kerry didnt mentioned "gay marriages" I would've pray for the best just for him. Sigh... I think we're all gona die in this world... just because of President Bush. Also he's not like close to his wife too. He's only giving himself the freedom and not the others. He's a selfish, mean, rude brat one... I hate everything about Bush except banning the gay marriage part. Sigh...President Bush made the law too stricted. all he want is STRICTED stuff. he's going to make the United States turn into North Korea. sigh...
 
HelloSunshine
post Dec 11 2004, 06:59 PM
Post #38


High Voltage!∞
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 4,728
Joined: Jul 2004
Member No: 29,157



QUOTE(iheartsimba @ Nov 24 2004, 4:58 PM)
that was my sig!

anyway. some laws i agree with, some i don't. but what are we gonna do about it.
many laws are nessicary, but some arn't. like banning gay marrages _dry.gif

I agree, some laws are fine, but some go way too far pinch.gif
 
Kriegsgefangene
post Dec 11 2004, 07:07 PM
Post #39


MCMXC a. D.
****

Group: Member
Posts: 106
Joined: Dec 2004
Member No: 69,715



We won't ever get over the fact of having laws over-done.

I mean-

If some kid jumped into your back yard, and drown himself in your pool. You could get sued, even for not doing anything.

It is possible though.

I LOVE THE AMERICAN WAY!
 
lovescream
post Dec 11 2004, 07:12 PM
Post #40


define our lives for us.
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 11,656
Joined: Aug 2004
Member No: 43,293



I guess the american way can be better as of some other countries.
pinch.gif
I heard that hong kong wont allow something..
i forgot but it was extremely crossing the line of laws.
 
Kriegsgefangene
post Dec 11 2004, 07:16 PM
Post #41


MCMXC a. D.
****

Group: Member
Posts: 106
Joined: Dec 2004
Member No: 69,715



Well.. the American way, may be better in third world countries (What happened to second?), but not to anywhere else.

America is the only industrialized country without health care.

That is why we are so sue-happy.

So we can get money for something bad that might have happened.

Even though we are stupid enough to sue McDonalds for making us fat. And somehow winning the case.

Oh well...
 
lovescream
post Dec 11 2004, 07:19 PM
Post #42


define our lives for us.
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 11,656
Joined: Aug 2004
Member No: 43,293



Junkfood and fatness is good every once in a while.
I just ate McDonalds today.
i dont get fat.
i'm extmreley skinny.
--off topic--
well, yeah... sueing mcdonalds is a problem.
fastfood resturants can cause good.
because fat food is slightly good for your body.

but i mean, if somebody goes there almost everyday then that is their problem.
 
Kriegsgefangene
post Dec 11 2004, 07:23 PM
Post #43


MCMXC a. D.
****

Group: Member
Posts: 106
Joined: Dec 2004
Member No: 69,715



So what if it was the person's problem. They could sue, because they could.. and they got away with it.

I don't like the judicial system anymore.
 
*x____duckii*
post Jan 1 2005, 11:08 PM
Post #44





Guest






I think the laws now are too strict. I mean, why is tobacco and achohol legal, but other drugs aren't? Might as well let all drugs be legal then. Why are the laws so strict? I mean I thought this was a country of freedom.
 

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: