wuts worse?, going to war or giving birth? |
Debate Rules
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
- Topics are not to bash others.
- Immature behaviors/comments will not be tolerated.
- Please remember, not everyone thinks like you. People have different ways of thinking and different perspectives. Let's respect each other's thoughts and responses.
- PLEASE, search before making new topics--especially popular topics like "God" and "Abortion" etc.
- PLEASE, read through the thread or at least a couple pages before posting. We have to maintain a certain level of maturity in here.
  |
 Dec 13 2004, 10:01 PM
Post
#26
|
|
 dripping destruction  Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929  |
the essense of giving birth is not taking a life... it's giving one.
after a woman gives birth, she has years of joy. after a man comes home from war, his girlfriend's left him, he might be disabled, and he might commit suicide or go crazy. |
|
|
|
|
Dec 13 2004, 10:07 PM
Post
#27
|
|
|
I love you <33333 Group: Member Posts: 2,928 Joined: Jul 2004 Member No: 30,404 |
i'd rather give birth, because you are giving someone else a life, and giving them to do good for you community.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 13 2004, 11:19 PM
Post
#28
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 675 Joined: Apr 2004 Member No: 14,822 |
My teacher told me giving birth the most painfulest thing a person can go through. He had head surgery and the nurse asked him, on a scale 1-10 how painful do you feel? He said 8...she said well a woman giving birth would be 10. ehh i can't remember the story right. But IMO giving birth is better than going to war because giving birth you are giving life going to war you are taking life.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 14 2004, 09:25 AM
Post
#29
|
|
 Brown hand smash Group: Member Posts: 654 Joined: Nov 2004 Member No: 60,582 |
QUOTE(remini @ Dec 13 2004, 8:13 PM) Going to war means killing people to save others. And giving birth means giving life, even if it means sacrificing your own. So either way, in that context, they're kind of the same. agree! giving birth and going to war may risk life but that thing are suppose to be. Life risk death. But risk must be taken because the greatest hazzard in life is risking-and reaching for-another life. |
|
|
|
| *mona lisa* |
Dec 14 2004, 05:42 PM
Post
#30
|
|
Guest |
i don't like where i'm living so i wouldn't fight for my country, so i would definitely hate birth more.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 15 2004, 02:50 PM
Post
#31
|
|
 i've never wanted anything rationale. Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 8,449 Joined: May 2004 Member No: 19,045 |
what the fcuk kind of topic is this?!?!
those are two WAAAAY different/random things to choose from. and how the hell is this a debate? |
|
|
|
|
Dec 23 2004, 10:54 AM
Post
#32
|
|
 This bitch better work! Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 13,681 Joined: Jul 2004 Member No: 28,095 |
i guess giving birth is worse. but i have never done either one so i really wouldn't know.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 23 2004, 07:46 PM
Post
#33
|
|
 Yawn Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 9,530 Joined: Nov 2004 Member No: 65,772 |
I think it would be worse going to war. When a woman has a baby, sure it is painful and emotional, but she is giving birth to her child and she is happy when it is over with. When you go to war...it leaves emotional scars when u see ppl being shot around u...you make friends with these ppl that are serving the country with you, n the next day they get shot infront of you, and they could die in your arms, plus you are killing other men that are just trying to serve their own country and have their wife and kids at home, and u know your the reason for the kids to grow up without a father, and war affects the entire country, and kills so many ppl, and hurts so many ppls familys in the end. war is worse then childbirth
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 24 2004, 09:36 PM
Post
#34
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Posts: 8,274 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 8,001 |
if you wanna stay alive, be pregant.
if you wanna died, go to war. simple as that. |
|
|
|
|
Dec 29 2004, 10:33 PM
Post
#35
|
|
|
Brie Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 10,172 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 20,548 |
I guess maybe going to war, because the events that will happen will be sort of unexpected.
I mean, yeah. You're trained and stuff.. but do you know exactly when something bad is going to happen? Do you know if you're going to be injured ahead of time? Do you know if a friend will be injured ahead of time? No, you basically don't. With birth, you basically know what you're getting into. I mean, yeah. It could be stillborn and you basically know it's going to hurt a lot.. but it's not as unexpected. People don't die from giving birth barely at all anymore, so that's not a big worry. I'd have to say going to war is worse, overall. |
|
|
|
|
Dec 30 2004, 05:03 AM
Post
#36
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 360 Joined: Nov 2004 Member No: 63,174 |
QUOTE(ryfitaDF @ Nov 24 2004, 10:41 AM) war is product of ignorance. misscarriages are out of peoples' hands.  Thats a pretty ignorant comment considering America was founded on War and without it there would be no America as we know it today. Some of our great heroes were war veterans. George Washington and U.S. Grant becoming future presidents. Are they ignorant for being in war? Are they ignorant for fighting for a race's safety and fair treatment --slavery. Also to person who said getting you head shot off is really painful, its really not. If youre head is severed with one blow you wouldnt feel a thing. |
|
|
|
|
Dec 30 2004, 09:40 AM
Post
#37
|
|
 Dark Lord of McCandless Group: Member Posts: 2,226 Joined: May 2004 Member No: 16,761 |
America only had one justified war -- the Revolution, where less than 5,000 people died. War is a product of ignorance nine times out of ten and desparation the other one time.
You can argue with me about the Civil War all you want, we should have let the South go... slavery would have been abolished in the South because of economic currents, and if you read the South's Constitution, they had many valid arguments and their constitution actually weakened the status of slavery by disallowing reimportation. |
|
|
|
|
Dec 30 2004, 01:42 PM
Post
#38
|
|
|
dripping destruction Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 |
the revolution wasn't even justified...
they gave us what we wanted, and we still went to war. |
|
|
|
|
Dec 30 2004, 02:44 PM
Post
#39
|
|
|
Dark Lord of McCandless Group: Member Posts: 2,226 Joined: May 2004 Member No: 16,761 |
The British did not give us what we wanted...
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 30 2004, 03:50 PM
Post
#40
|
|
 je suis une noix de coco <33 Group: Member Posts: 1,242 Joined: Nov 2004 Member No: 62,768 |
i would say giving birth
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 15 2005, 08:11 PM
Post
#41
|
|
 ticktock. Group: Member Posts: 1,138 Joined: Mar 2005 Member No: 118,235 |
War is worse. Not only is the person dead / hurt; so is the family&friends. When you are giving birth; only you feel the pain. But all that pain is worth it in the end. But in war; the Family&friends are hurt&they'll feel that pain for the rest of their lives.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 16 2005, 03:01 PM
Post
#42
|
|
 Remember your unique.... just like everybody else! Group: Member Posts: 148 Joined: Dec 2004 Member No: 71,858 |
I think i'd rather give birth.... and then 18 years later tell my daughter not to have kids, and send her to war because it is less painful.
 .... 
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 16 2005, 03:03 PM
Post
#43
|
|
 ^_^ Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 8,141 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 91,466 |
QUOTE(XoJennaoX @ Apr 16 2005, 2:01 PM) I think i'd rather give birth.... and then 18 years later tell my daughter not to have kids, and send her to war because it is less painful. .... Nice. |
|
|
|
|
Apr 16 2005, 07:37 PM
Post
#44
|
|
 Member Group: Member Posts: 12 Joined: Apr 2005 Member No: 124,408 |
Suppose someone gave birth in war? wouldn't that be really painful? like...2x painful? ouch.
(sarcasm) |
|
|
|
| *mona lisa* |
Apr 16 2005, 11:16 PM
Post
#45
|
|
Guest |
^They couldn't go to war if they were pregnant. Or thought they were pregnant. It's all in the applications.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 17 2005, 12:07 AM
Post
#46
|
|
 yan lin♥ Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 14,129 Joined: Apr 2004 Member No: 13,627 |
i think going to war is worse. imagine how many more people die in war. giving birth to a stillborn is only the loss of one life compared the hundreds of thousands of people who suffer in war.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 17 2005, 01:02 AM
Post
#47
|
|
 HAAAAAAAA. Group: Member Posts: 4,472 Joined: Dec 2004 Member No: 75,068 |
Going to war is worse. Of courseeeeeee.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 17 2005, 04:37 PM
Post
#48
|
|
|
dripping destruction Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 |
can someone close this?
there is no actual debating anymore; we've pretty much agreed the two are different things. |
|
|
|
|
Apr 22 2005, 10:09 AM
Post
#49
|
|
 candy shopper Group: Member Posts: 34 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 89,338 |
QUOTE(gotnoheart @ Apr 17 2005, 12:16 AM) ^They couldn't go to war if they were pregnant. Or thought they were pregnant. It's all in the applications. What if there was a pregnant woman in the place where the war was being fought? She's giving birth while grenades and such are being blown just a mile or so away... that would suck. |
|
|
|
|
Apr 22 2005, 11:33 AM
Post
#50
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Official Designer Posts: 4,591 Joined: Dec 2004 Member No: 77,305 |
Going to war is worse, so giving birth would be nothing.
|
|
|
|
|
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: