what is pg-13, as pertaining to society? |
![]() ![]() |
what is pg-13, as pertaining to society? |
| *[2]Nekked* |
Nov 5 2004, 09:54 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Guest |
this is ridiculous. the booty thread was closed, and i'm assuming here that one or a few of the mods deemed it un-pg13.
lets elaborate on what pg-13 is ok kids? QUOTE PG-13 Parents Strongly Cautioned - Some material may be inappropriate for children under 13. Signifies that the film rated may be inappropriate for pre-teens. Parents should be especially careful about letting their younger children attend. Rough or persistent violence is absent; sexually-oriented-nudity is generally absent; some scenes of drug use may be seen; some use of one of the harsher sexually-derived words may be heard. nudity: QUOTE 1. Having no clothing; naked. 2. Permitting or featuring full exposure of the body: a nude beach. last time i checked, the asses in that thread were pretty much clothed. when kids start exposing there bumhole, then i can see how that'd be over PG-13, but yknow what? i see clothing,whether it be someones underoos, or a miniskirt / wtfe, it doesnt matter what, but i see material/some sort of fabric on the asses in that thread. look at all the crap they allow in pg-13 movies, and tell me this board isn't pg-13 as well. and i know someones gonna be like "this isnt the movies, this is real life, and there are people under 13 here" ok yknow what, shut the hell up, because when you refer to PG-13 or any MPAA rating, you are refering to the standards and guidelines pertaining to that rating in which they assign anything in the media. you can't say "this is supposed to be pg-13, but not like in the movies" because that doesnt even make sense. you cant give a rating to life in general, or how society interacts; i'm sorry but that kind of thing is too broad to set a rating on. and yeah, i'm fully aware of the handful of preteen kids we have on createblog, but that still doesnt change the fact that this board is PG-13. When someone tells us that its supposed to be PG, then I might see how the fact that there are under-13 kids on this board even relates. what are everyone elses thoughts? |
|
|
|
Nov 5 2004, 09:59 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
te quiero ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Banned Posts: 2,586 Joined: Apr 2004 Member No: 14,678 |
WTF??? THEY CLOSED THE BOOTY THREAD????
:goes and checks: damn. [edit] i think i know who closed it. and this really pisses me off as there is NOTHING un-pg13 in that thread. i remember posting up a picture from some rating's site about what pg-13 was. ... oh, and a plus. DONT WE JUST f**kING LOVE IT WHEN THREADS ARE CLOSED WITHOUT A WARNING OR REASON AS TO WHY IT WAS CLOSED. |
|
|
|
Nov 5 2004, 10:04 AM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() wanderlust personified. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Designer Posts: 7,515 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 797 |
i agree. i don't see what's not PG-13 or explicit about a clothed booty. Are you saying it's too "R rated"?
Let's elaborate on the guidelines for a PG-13 rating, shall we? From the MPAA (Movie Picture Association of America), the guys who set the guidelines for these ratings: QUOTE A PG-13 film is one which, in the view of the Rating Board, leaps beyond the boundaries of the PG rating in theme, violence, nudity, sensuality, language, or other contents, but does not quite fit within the restricted R category. Any drug use content will initially require at least a PG-13 rating. In effect, the PG-13 cautions parents with more stringency than usual to give special attention to this film before they allow their 12-year olds and younger to attend. If nudity is sexually oriented, the film will generally not be found in the PG-13 category. If violence is too rough or persistent, the film goes into the R (restricted) rating. A film's single use of one of the harsher sexually-derived words, though only as an expletive, shall initially require the Rating Board to issue that film at least a PG-13 rating. More than one such expletive must lead the Rating Board to issue a film an R rating, as must even one of these words used in a sexual context. These films can be rated less severely, however, if by a special vote, the Rating Board feels that a lesser rating would more responsibly reflect the opinion of American parents. Basically, this is saying that if it's beyond PG rating but not quite rated R, then it fits in there with PG-13. We can all agree that that's where the booty thread would fit, correct? In simpler terms: QUOTE PG-13: parents strongly cautioned, some material may be inappropriate for children under 13 parents are alerted to be very careful about allowing preteenage children to view this film may contain nudity, profanity and sexually-derived words may contain violence may contain drug use "May contain nudity". I don't even see any nudity in the booty thread. For reference, the meaning of "R rated": QUOTE R:"Restricted, Under 17 Requires Accompanying Parent Or Adult Guardian." In the opinion of the Rating Board, this film definitely contains some adult material. Parents are strongly urged to find out more about this film before they allow their children to accompany them. An R-rated film may include hard language, or tough violence, or nudity within sensual scenes, or drug abuse or other elements, or a combination of some of the above, so that parents are counseled, in advance, to take this advisory rating very seriously. Parents must find out more about an R-rated movie before they allow their teenagers to view it. Tell me, what has been posted in these forums that follow the R rating rather than the PG-13 rating? Here's another example of a board/forum who adheres to a PG-13 guideline: QUOTE As many of you know we have maintained a stance that this is a site that should be safe for young children to visit. Also we would not want children exploited in any way. Because of this, we have maintained that photos should maintain a PG-13 rating. We know this term is not a world-wide known standard. The best definition we can give for this is... no "body part" that would normally covered by a bikini bathing suit will be posted (for girls) or a boys bathing suit for the boys. On photos that are to be posted we have come up with the following policy for photos. "All photos to the web site are to meet the following standards; 1) no photos deemed by a vote of the discussion list team to be provocative or sexual by nature will be allowed, 2) no images with pasties or thongs are allowed, 3) the general guideline states that any body part that is normally covered by a conventional bathing suit should not be exposed, 4) no nipples may be exposed for a girl of any age..." I mean, when you say that a board is rated PG-13 you're referring to the ratings that are given for a PG-13 movie because thats what these ratings are based upon. If somehow the guidelines they want to set are different from the ones the MPAA have already set, then don't even bother using an MPAA rating to set guidelines for these boards and just list out the rules instead. Sounds like they're looking to have a G or PG rating instead. |
|
|
|
| *tweeak* |
Nov 5 2004, 01:51 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Guest |
theres even mild nudity in pg-13 sometimes.
for an overview, take this quiz, as it covers life ratings: http://www.readingforresults.com/rating/quiz.htm |
|
|
|
Nov 5 2004, 02:03 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 1,245 Joined: May 2004 Member No: 17,033 |
wtf, if you ever watch somethings gotta give thats pg-13 and there is nude in that, we have clothes on so who cares? wtf this is dumb last time i freaking checked we had clothes on also..
|
|
|
|
Nov 5 2004, 02:31 PM
Post
#6
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 68 Joined: Nov 2004 Member No: 60,056 |
well its clean they do have clothes on right? but I can see why they closed it tho cause most of the Admins here are '11 or 13' *shurgs* its stupid and it shouldn't be closed.
|
|
|
|
Nov 5 2004, 02:35 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
yeah. i'm kevin. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 1,399 Joined: Aug 2004 Member No: 38,782 |
none of thsoe pics had nudity, clothes were on. this sucks
|
|
|
|
Nov 5 2004, 02:53 PM
Post
#8
|
|
![]() Day's Nearly Over ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,553 Joined: Aug 2004 Member No: 45,183 |
It was too much for the little kids.. too much asses. It seemed to have gotten in their face... *shakes head*
|
|
|
|
| *tweeak* |
Nov 5 2004, 02:54 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Guest |
^but little kids have asses too! and they stick them in each others faces all the time...
|
|
|
|
Nov 5 2004, 02:55 PM
Post
#10
|
|
![]() Day's Nearly Over ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,553 Joined: Aug 2004 Member No: 45,183 |
QUOTE(my_papaya @ Nov 5 2004, 2:54 PM) ^but little kids have asses too! and they stick them in each others faces all the time... But the poor kids.... it was too much for them. These asses were fully matured.. and grown.. and tanned! :shock: |
|
|
|
Nov 5 2004, 03:05 PM
Post
#11
|
|
![]() wanderlust personified. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Designer Posts: 7,515 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 797 |
QUOTE(Days Nearly Over @ Nov 5 2004, 3:55 PM) But the poor kids.... it was too much for them. These asses were fully matured.. and grown.. and tanned! :shock: LMAO! |
|
|
|
| *AngelicEyz00* |
Nov 5 2004, 03:32 PM
Post
#12
|
|
Guest |
haha, that's so f*cking stupid
idiots |
|
|
|
Nov 5 2004, 04:48 PM
Post
#13
|
|
![]() Death is a promise given to us at birth ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Designer Posts: 4,757 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 7,459 |
yeah, it pg-13, cuz that the thing you would see on tv, but not pg related stuff.
|
|
|
|
Nov 5 2004, 04:50 PM
Post
#14
|
|
![]() Wow it's been a long time!! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 1,672 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 8,954 |
i've spoken my opinion on this matter before. it's a tad bit sad... but we'll fix things eventually. if createblog get's too gay, it will be filled with under 13 year olds taking about farting and masturbation, and there's nothing worse than being a community like that. so you guys can pretty much choose who you want to make your audience. PG 13 or... G? yeah. that includes the censorship guys--if createblog gets really gay and censored and G rated I guaruntee all the cool members (me and trish specifically) will leave.
|
|
|
|
| *[2]Nekked* |
Nov 5 2004, 04:53 PM
Post
#15
|
|
Guest |
and yknow if you're under 13, then you've been warned.. this is a PG13 site. some of the content here will be a little too explicit for you, but that doesnt make us responsible for anything that you see here. the site clearly states that this is a PG13 site.
|
|
|
|
Nov 5 2004, 04:55 PM
Post
#16
|
|
|
WWMD?! - i am from the age of BM 2 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 5,308 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 8,848 |
QUOTE(metabolic666 @ Nov 5 2004, 1:31 PM) well its clean they do have clothes on right? but I can see why they closed it tho cause most of the Admins here are '11 or 13' *shurgs* its stupid and it shouldn't be closed. not most of the admins OR mods for that matter are 11 or 13. |
|
|
|
| *[2]Nekked* |
Nov 5 2004, 04:57 PM
Post
#17
|
|
Guest |
we do have a few really young ones though..
|
|
|
|
| *krnxswat* |
Nov 5 2004, 04:59 PM
Post
#18
|
|
Guest |
Then I might as well as take a naked picture of butt except a little tiny paper covering my butthole.
|
|
|
|
Nov 5 2004, 05:00 PM
Post
#19
|
|
|
WWMD?! - i am from the age of BM 2 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 5,308 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 8,848 |
yes, but most are mature enough to handle stuff on cb..i mean, i'm not that much older than 13..i'm only 14..and it's becoming too innocent.
most, not all.. |
|
|
|
Nov 5 2004, 05:00 PM
Post
#20
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 1,245 Joined: May 2004 Member No: 17,033 |
rofl. seon ho you have a way with words ;)
|
|
|
|
| *[2]Nekked* |
Nov 5 2004, 05:01 PM
Post
#21
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(krnxswat @ Nov 5 2004, 5:59 PM) Then I might as well as take a naked picture of butt except a little tiny paper covering my butthole. clothing. not paper. clothing. underwear is clothing. it covers the entire ass. |
|
|
|
| *krnxswat* |
Nov 5 2004, 05:01 PM
Post
#22
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(WhatsYourExcuse? @ Nov 5 2004, 5:00 PM) rofl. seon ho you have a way with words ;) Is that good or bad? |
|
|
|
| *[2]Nekked* |
Nov 5 2004, 05:02 PM
Post
#23
|
|
Guest |
and you seem to have missed the point, seon ho.
yes it is a little explicit. but its still pg13 |
|
|
|
| *krnxswat* |
Nov 5 2004, 05:06 PM
Post
#24
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE([2) Nekked,Nov 5 2004, 5:02 PM] and you seem to have missed the point, seon ho. yes it is a little explicit. but its still pg13 No, I got it. I just decided to be silly about it. |
|
|
|
Nov 5 2004, 05:12 PM
Post
#25
|
|
![]() This bitch better work! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 13,681 Joined: Jul 2004 Member No: 28,095 |
last time i checked, pg-13 movies have sex in them. and they won't let you show a butt. well, then i guess that you had better get rid of KRNXSWAT's avatar because he is shirt-less!
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |