male pregnancy, immoral? Options

[gigiopolis]

I personally think this site is bs...click on Clyven the mouse that thinks like a human. You can "chat" to him online. That's complete bs. I've seen a program like this before: Oliverbot You can talk to a robot and he'll give adequate responses. The mouse is fake.

The male pregnancy, well I'm not sure about that. I've never actually heard of that before, and I suspect that it would've created much more media attention, so I surely would have heard about a male pregnancy. If it is true though, I think it's awesome.

[slurp]

i didnt know male pregnancy actually existed. i dont think id be against it or for it, sure itd be nice for males to experience what females go through during their pregnancy but are the technology trustworthy? is it unhealthy? well i dont exactly know but my opinoin would be it should be an option for men that would actually like to experience pregnancy. erm hope i made sense

[tsohg]

I believe this is wrong.. Its not in Gods will

[racegirl24A]

God made it that women are the ones that have children. Not men. Im against the whole "male pregnancy" thing, it goes against what God created.

[laylooo]

that's realllly freaky

[*corizzle20*]

ok. that is jsut WRONG

[sikdragon]

Riiiiiiiight...

So your God, who specifically says to Not kill, and to Turn the other cheek, is advocating killing people who oppose him?

You know who you sound like. You sound like our good buddy Osama.

God says not to murder, killing is different depending upon circumstance, read the old testament after exodus, there are many more laws and expansion of the ten commandments throughout the bible.

WOW! Where did *that* come from?  That is a very rude and racist thing to say... 

Were you offended? hope not, if you were i apologize.

I still stand by that statement. My views are not Gods views, i would just like to prolong life on this earth before the tribulation. If they were his it would have happened.

[bhrama]

why is religion being involved?? I mean, does it say anywhere in the bible that guys arent suppose to have babies? i mean, if science is that advanced now that we can change the bone structure, the genes, the body fluids, all that so that guys can have babies, I think it's a pretty good achievement. I mean, i'd take it like a sign from god actually cuz that would mean that gay people could have babies. Then if gay marriages are legallized then you know that god is trying to tell us that its ok to be gay. But anyways, lets not go into the whole gay marriage thing, that'll just get more debates started... I think its an incredible achievement though!

[heyyfrankie]

um. well to answer your question, i don't think that it is immoral. but i just don't why men would want to go through that!?! but maybe some men want to feel the joy of giving new life and the pain of the process. but how do they get pregnant. i mean where does it grow? (the baby that is). hmm. very strange. but i don't think it is a sign from the devil or something. if science can do it, and if some men want to get pregnant, then they can if the want to. i guess.

[ThisIsRonRon]

I don't think it's immoral at all because guys are always saying that getting kicked in the balls hurts more than having a baby. I say we let them feel the pain!! LOL

oh man. getting kick in the balls probably hurts just as much as having a baby. cause i fcuking cry when i get hit there. and all i wanna do is cry for like a week if its hard enough [luckily i never get hit there often.]. girls dont know how it feels. but then again, i have no clue how having a baby feels. so i wont really complain.

anyways, about that baby thing. i guess im all for it, as long as he doesnt hurt himself. i wonder how the fetus eats though. its pretty crazy. and i really dont think men dont have the type of body to have a baby. whatever.

[sadolakced acid]

males do not have the right genes. the Y gene, when given to a fetus, creates the placenta which tries to invade the mother and take all the nutrition possible.

females, with the double X, have the capabilities to fend off the male placenta.

the picture is doctored, anyhow.

and man who wished to carry a child would have to have a sex change to get a uterus. so he'd have to get is male parts removed. check his undies.


and for the debate on whether getting kicked in the balls hurts more than childbirth:

balls were not designed to be kicked .

women are designed to give birth.

yes, both hurt. but with balls you're kicking nerves. with birth you're stretching bone.

but i guess if thebone is less strechable it could hurt too...

[Alternativemado]

Is this even true the whole pregnant guy thing? IF it was then how come i didn't see it on TV? An advancement like this would'vr been top news wordlwide! Now, is it even possible for science to contruct new organs? i am guess they had to create a uterus for the baby to develop in. I am going with this story being false but maybe i am wrong...we'll just have to see.

[xquizit]

wow. i'm shocked. too shocked to even say anything about it at the moment.

i'll be back.

[iheartsimba]

i was telling my firend about it...and he didnt belive me...so since hes stubborn like that he looked up covers of time magazines...and he said "male pregnancy" was never in it =/

[sadolakced acid]

i have read time every week for the past 4 year.

that's not a real cover.

nor a real photo

nor a real science.

[limabeanzryummy]

finally a poll that knows whats exactly on my mind.. lol... i think guys should give birth to some of our children :D.. i mean, male seahorses can do it... if they can carry over 100 little babies in them, then im pretty sure that guys can carry at least one :]

[bellpepper]

I totally think its immoral. Scientist are getting to full of themselves these days. Their seriously trying to play God. When will it stop? Before you know it scientist will probably try to create their own human or monkey.

[voguelove]

is that even possible? men dont have wombs or do they have a wavgina to push the baby out. did "mr. lee" already have the kid?

[Chii]

it is all a hoax plus, even the topic starte said it was fake on page four.
however it's not that i think it's immoral that men should be able to give birth...i just think that it's just so different and odd... i wouldn't want my husband to do it if it became possible someday but if it makes another guy happy, good for him, i wouldn't oppose it.

[EddieV]

That's just wrong.

[Ington]

Its a physical impossibility. Men cannot give birth. The end.


They shouldn't either

[sadolakced acid]

i'm tired of this coming back up sporodically. so:

[topic closed for complete lack of factual backing]

if you disagree, feel free to PM me or any of the other mods.