Did Bush cheat during the debate? |
Debate Rules
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
- Topics are not to bash others.
- Immature behaviors/comments will not be tolerated.
- Please remember, not everyone thinks like you. People have different ways of thinking and different perspectives. Let's respect each other's thoughts and responses.
- PLEASE, search before making new topics--especially popular topics like "God" and "Abortion" etc.
- PLEASE, read through the thread or at least a couple pages before posting. We have to maintain a certain level of maturity in here.
  |
 Oct 7 2004, 11:30 AM
Post
#1
|
|
 cellar door  Group: Member Posts: 85 Joined: Aug 2004 Member No: 41,513  |
If anyone had seen the Presidential debate, there has been speculation that Bush was wired, as in, wearing an earpiece and being fed lines.
At around 40 mins and 30 seconds, Bush, in the middle of one of his answers says, "Now let me finish" as if someone was interrupting him, yet nobody was. People are saying he was talking to the person on his earpiece. You can View the Real movie of the debate and fast foward to 40 mins and 30 seconds and check it out for yourself. VERY interesting. Also, initially the debate comission barred shots of the candidtates from the back of the stage, but the networks with rules that stopped them from showing a good debate so they shot candidates any way they wanted, including behind.  You can see what looks like a squarish buldge and an s-shaped cord running up the right shoulder. Many speculate it is a reciever. Supposedly this isn't the first time he is thought to use a reciever. During several speeches, some cities and radio stations reportedly heard another voice during broadcasts speaking, word for word, and extremely slower before Bush. You can read more about it at Isbushwired.com. |
|
|
|
|
Oct 7 2004, 11:35 AM
Post
#2
|
|
 LunchboxXx Group: Member Posts: 1,789 Joined: May 2004 Member No: 16,810 |
that would be awesome if he was, cause then not only would he be in trouble, but he would have cheated and still been crushed! hehe
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 7 2004, 12:47 PM
Post
#3
|
|
 Don't wake ghostie. Group: Official Member Posts: 3,546 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 2,405 |
Wow, if he was wired... god think of that, IF he were wired and he STILL didn't win... that's hilarious!!
|
|
|
|
| *kryogenix* |
Oct 7 2004, 03:15 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Guest |
HA. Conspiracy theory. lol. The picture is way too blurry to tell.
|
|
|
|
| *CrackedRearView* |
Oct 7 2004, 04:01 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(NATIONAL BONER DAY @ Oct 7 2004, 10:30 AM) You can read more about it at Isbushwired.com. [/color] Oh now there's the most reliable source I've ever seen. That proves it. Please...come up with something a little more reputable. And even if he does receive outside help with articulation of his policies, it doesn't change his position. Just because you can speak well, does not mean you're a good politician. Perfect example? Adolf Hitler. |
|
|
|
|
Oct 7 2004, 04:49 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
cellar door Group: Member Posts: 85 Joined: Aug 2004 Member No: 41,513 |
QUOTE(CrackedRearView @ Oct 7 2004, 4:01 PM) Oh now there's the most reliable source I've ever seen. That proves it. Please...come up with something a little more reputable. And even if he does receive outside help with articulation of his policies, it doesn't change his position. Just because you can speak well, does not mean you're a good politician. Perfect example? Adolf Hitler. None of these are my own words. I took it from the website with the simple intention of starting a dicussion among those interested in politics, therefore how much sense does it make to tell me that I have to "come up with something a little more reputable." Did I write the damn think? No. Frankly, I could give a damn if Bush did cheat or not because it still doesn't change who I am supporting and will vote for; but for those who might be interested, I posted it for them. Furthermore, do you know what the rules are to a formal debate? |
|
|
|
|
Oct 7 2004, 05:20 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Don't wake ghostie. Group: Official Member Posts: 3,546 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 2,405 |
crackedrearviewmirror your opinion is totally useless to me considering your little outbreak in createblog/
|
|
|
|
| *kryogenix* |
Oct 7 2004, 07:05 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(NATIONAL BONER DAY @ Oct 7 2004, 4:49 PM) Furthermore, do you know what the rules are to a formal debate? obviously John Edwards doesn't. either that or he chose to ignore the rules. |
|
|
|
|
Oct 7 2004, 07:54 PM
Post
#9
|
|
 dripping destruction Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 |
adolf hitler was a good politician. that's how he took over germany.
i'd prefer that bad politicians ruled the world. good politicians aren't good people. from machavellian's "the prince" - do whatever you need to do. it's not that he's so dumb he needs to cheat that's bad- we already knew that. it's that he cheats. that's what's bad. do you want your president to cheat? yea, the photos aren't that great. but there should NOT be a bulge there. that's your spine, it goes inwards. people hide knives in that place. now, it would not have shown up if bush wasn't leaning on the podium. and what is it? trick of the light? |
|
|
|
|
Oct 7 2004, 09:27 PM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Don't wake ghostie. Group: Official Member Posts: 3,546 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 2,405 |
Correction, Adolf Hitler didn't take over the government he was voted into power.
But I honestly don't even think a politcian is right for the president of the united states. Politicians tend to be rich guys or born into rich families, who have never known first hand what it is to be middle class, or to be poor. I don't want a rich daddy's boy who has never experienced that to lead this country. I guess that's why I like Clinton. |
|
|
|
|
Oct 7 2004, 09:43 PM
Post
#11
|
|
|
You guys are dumb. Group: Member Posts: 1,252 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 25,094 |
Do you think the people who prepare the Presidential debate would be so moronic enough to not check for a freaking ear piece?
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 7 2004, 09:50 PM
Post
#12
|
|
 creepy heather Group: Official Member Posts: 4,208 Joined: Aug 2004 Member No: 41,580 |
seems like just a bunch of leftwingers trying to make him look like a moron
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 7 2004, 10:20 PM
Post
#13
|
|
|
LunchboxXx Group: Member Posts: 1,789 Joined: May 2004 Member No: 16,810 |
QUOTE(Heathasm @ Oct 7 2004, 9:50 PM) seems like just a bunch of leftwingers trying to make him look like a moron hehe no leftwingers required. 
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 7 2004, 10:38 PM
Post
#14
|
|
|
You guys are dumb. Group: Member Posts: 1,252 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 25,094 |
QUOTE(ryfitaDF @ Oct 7 2004, 10:20 PM) hehe no leftwingers required. How is Bush a moron? |
|
|
|
|
Oct 8 2004, 02:05 AM
Post
#15
|
|
 The Return of Sathington Willoughby. Group: Member Posts: 313 Joined: Apr 2004 Member No: 14,724 |
do you REALLY need to get us started on that? thats like asking "how is water good?" the list goes on and on.
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 8 2004, 07:56 AM
Post
#16
|
|
|
Don't wake ghostie. Group: Official Member Posts: 3,546 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 2,405 |
oh hahahaha!
leftwingers.... hahaha I hate it when people say left wing or right wing, it's like to soften the blow for saying that you or someone else is a republican or democrat. |
|
|
|
| *kryogenix* |
Oct 8 2004, 01:58 PM
Post
#17
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(Retrogressive @ Oct 8 2004, 7:56 AM) oh hahahaha! leftwingers.... hahaha I hate it when people say left wing or right wing, it's like to soften the blow for saying that you or someone else is a republican or democrat. laugh at it, but that is a clear problem with the Kerry ticket. Kerry and Edwards are the 1st and 4th most liberal senators, respectively. Is that good for America, to have such an extreme executive branch? |
|
|
|
| *kryogenix* |
Oct 8 2004, 02:55 PM
Post
#18
|
|
Guest |
Excuse, the double post please.
The bulge on Bush's back is probably from the bulletproof vest that he and John Kerry wear in public locations. That's a lot more logical than "0MG BU$H 1$ t3h CH34TER!!11111111shit+1oneoneeleven". So that is what I will go with until someone proves this wrong. |
|
|
|
|
Oct 8 2004, 03:11 PM
Post
#19
|
|
 ohBrian Group: Member Posts: 556 Joined: Aug 2004 Member No: 44,625 |
he tell lies everyday...
he blame everyone for nothing .... if u read the newspaper they sent some SPY to investigate the IRAQ for wpns of mass destr. but found nothing... 1064 soldiers killed in action and thousand of iraq men woman kids died. |
|
|
|
| *kryogenix* |
Oct 8 2004, 03:20 PM
Post
#20
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(ohBrian @ Oct 8 2004, 3:11 PM) he tell lies everyday... he blame everyone for nothing .... if u read the newspaper they sent some SPY to investigate the IRAQ for wpns of mass destr. but found nothing... 1064 soldiers killed in action and thousand of iraq men woman kids died. WTF does this have to do with the presidential debate? stay on topic please. |
|
|
|
|
Oct 8 2004, 04:02 PM
Post
#21
|
|
|
Don't wake ghostie. Group: Official Member Posts: 3,546 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 2,405 |
yes Ohbrian, stay on topic and if you want to discuss anything please provide SOME kind of proof instead of just statements.
BTW: I wasn't laughing because Kerry and Edwards are super smooth (thanks to their careers) I was laughing because when people call each other left or right winger it sounds like they are eating a chicken or something.... oh joy. |
|
|
|
|
Oct 8 2004, 04:10 PM
Post
#22
|
|
|
creepy heather Group: Official Member Posts: 4,208 Joined: Aug 2004 Member No: 41,580 |
QUOTE(ohBrian @ Oct 8 2004, 3:11 PM) he tell lies everyday... he blame everyone for nothing .... if u read the newspaper they sent some SPY to investigate the IRAQ for wpns of mass destr. but found nothing... 1064 soldiers killed in action and thousand of iraq men woman kids died. some thing a bit more specific than "he tell lies" and "he blame every one" would be more helpful. Given the intel that the president had at the time, it was very reasonable that he sent troops to iraq. did you know that even john kerry said he would have done the same thing given the same intel? |
|
|
|
|
Oct 8 2004, 09:36 PM
Post
#23
|
|
 Quand j'étais jeune... Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 6,826 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 1,272 |
QUOTE(ohBrian @ Oct 8 2004, 3:11 PM) he tell lies everyday... he blame everyone for nothing .... if u read the newspaper they sent some SPY to investigate the IRAQ for wpns of mass destr. but found nothing... 1064 soldiers killed in action and thousand of iraq men woman kids died. HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA Okay. It was more like he repeated the lie from someone else. I guess that's just gossip or hearsay, but as far as I know, the CIA don't usally give the president info based only on gossip and hearsay. If he lied, so did the Russian and British Intel. |
|
|
|
|
Oct 8 2004, 10:26 PM
Post
#24
|
|
|
The Return of Sathington Willoughby. Group: Member Posts: 313 Joined: Apr 2004 Member No: 14,724 |
most of this intel was sketchy at best. most people are unhappy that he didn't bother to wait for more solid intel before going to blow up iraq. it's like i told you retrogressive is going to kill you and you decide that thats basis to kill retro first.
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 8 2004, 10:39 PM
Post
#25
|
|
|
Quand j'étais jeune... Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 6,826 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 1,272 |
Well, what's his reason for killing me? I mean, did I provoke him in anyway? (Saddam himself provoked the US and the rest of the world).
I mean, intel was sketchy but it wasn't like there was nothing to go on. Who would have thought that Intelligent Agencies were so untrustworthy? |
|
|
|
|
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: