"Happy Birthday to You" is protected by copywrite Options

[gregisapollak]

Check it out!!!!!!!!!!

[F_L_I_P]

wow never really thought of it....

-Phil-

[waccoon]

Well, nobody's gonna say that they wrote the happy birthday song, so I guess everyone's safe..

..

"Happy Birthday to You" is protected by copywrite?
yu mean copyright [=

[captured_serenit...]

wow...that's really nifty fact to know...

[silver-rain]

wow, that's really interesting to know.

[yeseulx3]

well, well... you do learn new things every day, eh?

[Rice_on_my_shoe]

Cool

[sheepy]

umm.. interesting .. i c..

[Note]

^^how could you think that's cool!? that's just absolute bull! ^^

::jerry::

[MrElsewhere]

haha..so..one more law im breaking in a year?

[pikimoo]

I already knew that.. but I think it'd be stupid for someone to sue someone else for singing a song that no living person wrote.

[waccoon]

I already knew that.. but I think it'd be stupid for someone to sue someone else for singing a song that no living person wrote.

Um, because it's copyrighted doesn't mean you can't use it. It means that you can't claim that you wrote the song, and if you're not a complete idiot, you wouldn't anyways.

[pikimoo]

Um, because it's copyrighted doesn't mean you can't use it. It means that you can't claim that you wrote the song, and if you're not a complete idiot, you wouldn't anyways.

I read the page. It says you can't sing it on tv, make little watches with tunes, etc.

Basically, you're not allowed to make profits from it without liscencing.(ugh..sp?)

[aznriceboi]

hahaha thats stupid, so i'll just go copyright a word and every time some one says it i'll sue them. haha great...

[waccoon]

I read the page. It says you can't sing it on tv, make little watches with tunes, etc.

Most people aren't going to broadcast their birthday parties on television, and when you see it being sung on television, read the credits at the end of the program.

[pikimoo]

Most people aren't going to broadcast their birthday parties on television, and when you see it being sung on television, read the credits at the end of the program.

Yeah, well it's not ALWAYS in the credits. But even in that case, I still think it would be stupid to sue.

By my earlier comment, I didn't mean just any person singing it. I meant someone possible to sue. In which case.... stupid.






btw Nick, I LOVE your avatar.

[shawty_redd]

i never knew that happy b-day was copyrighted

[waccoon]

Yeah, well it's not ALWAYS in the credits. But even in that case, I still think it would be stupid to sue.

By my earlier comment, I didn't mean just any person singing it. I meant someone possible to sue. In which case.... stupid.






btw Nick, I LOVE your avatar.

Well, it the creator really around to sue?

My signature's pretty sexy too

[glit_gal]

wow i never knew that . But it would be dumb for someone to go sueing people just cause they were singing that song

[pikimoo]

Well, it the creator really around to sue?

My signature's pretty sexy too

The creator's sisters are suing.

[waccoon]

The creator's sisters are suing.

Royalties are due, of course, for commercial uses of the song, such as playing or singing it for profit, using it in movies, television programs, and stage shows, or incorporating it into musical products such as watches and greeting cards; as well, royalties are due for public performance, defined by copyright law as performances which occur "at a place open to the public, or at any place where a substantial number of persons outside of a normal circle of a family and its social acquaintances is gathered." So, crooning "Happy Birthday to You" to family members and friends at home is fine, but performing a copyrighted work in a public setting such as a restaurant or a sports arena technically requires a license from ASCAP or the Harry Fox Agency (although such infringements are rarely prosecuted).

[pikimoo]

The Chicago-based music publisher Clayton F. Summy Company, working with Jessica Hill, published and copyrighted "Happy Birthday" in 1935. Under the laws in effect at the time, the Hills' copyright would have expired after one 28-year term and a renewal of similar length, falling into public domain by 1991. However, the Copyright Act of 1976 extended the term of copyright protection to 75 years from date of publication, and the Copyright Term Extension Act of 1998 added another 20 years, so under current law the copyright protection of "Happy Birthday" will remain intact until at least 2030.

Royalties are due, of course, for commercial uses of the song, such as playing or singing it for profit, using it in movies, television programs, and stage shows, or incorporating it into musical products such as watches and greeting cards; as well, royalties are due for public performance, defined by copyright law as performances which occur "at a place open to the public, or at any place where a substantial number of persons outside of a normal circle of a family and its social acquaintances is gathered." So, crooning "Happy Birthday to You" to family members and friends at home is fine, but performing a copyrighted work in a public setting such as a restaurant or a sports arena technically requires a license from ASCAP or the Harry Fox Agency  (although such infringements are rarely prosecuted).

It IS rare. And maybe I misunderstood(as it happens often) But still, my opinion remains. Suing someone for singing a song that you didn't write is stupid. And oops.. this isn't a debate.
Sorry.

[Counting]

Woah..I never knew that a song which repeats the words like..4 times is copyrighted. oO;;

[pikimoo]

Woah..I never knew that a song which repeats the words like..4 times is copyrighted. oO;;

I'm pretty sure it's the tune that's copyrighted