AMD Athalon Processer |
  |
 Aug 23 2004, 01:59 AM
Post
#1
|
|
 GOT CREATEBLOG?  Group: Member Posts: 779 Joined: Apr 2004 Member No: 12,544  |
I have a AMD Athalon 3000+
is thr 2800+ better? what about AMD Athalon 64? explain the difference? |
|
|
|
| *kryogenix* |
Aug 23 2004, 11:43 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Guest |
AMD claims 3000+ is equivalent or superior to a P4 running at 3.0ghz.
2800+ is equivalent to a P4 running at 2.8 ghz. The 3000+ would be better, unless of course, you don't have the money for it. The Athlon64 is a 64 bit processor. It's also compatible with 32-bit applications. |
|
|
|
|
Aug 23 2004, 12:45 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
GOT CREATEBLOG? Group: Member Posts: 779 Joined: Apr 2004 Member No: 12,544 |
Thank you!
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 23 2004, 09:29 PM
Post
#4
|
|
 The red or the blue Group: Member Posts: 294 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 19,976 |
The AMD-64 also has higher performance than the XP 2800+ or XP 3000+ processors. With it's Hyper-transport technology (I believe 1600mhz FSB (front side bus)) it can run at slower clock speed while pumping out comparable performance to higher clock speed Pentium Processors. Microsoft has a beta version for a 64 bit windows and Pentium is developing a 64 bit processor of it's own.
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: