Log In · Register

 

Debate Rules

Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.

Debate.

5 Pages V   1 2 3 > »   
Closed TopicStart new topic
male pregnancy, immoral?
*[2]Nekked*
post Aug 14 2004, 06:44 PM
Post #1





Guest






http://malepregnancy.com

wow science is really advancing huh? there are some people who disagree with this new development because they think that it defies nature and god's will.

one (pregnant) woman complains that she is appalled that a man could share the same experience she is having with her unborn child, and that the miracle of pregnancy is something only women should experience.

i however think this is a great step in science, because what if you wanted to have children, but your body wasnt fit to nurture and support a living child inside you? could your partner carry the child instead? some women complain that men should have to go through the pain of child birth, and now this is their chance.
 
sikdragon
post Aug 14 2004, 06:49 PM
Post #2


Bardic Nation
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,113
Joined: Aug 2004
Member No: 38,059



so what do they get a big ass c- section? im not sure i understand the concept, ok now that i have read it, i believe it is the same kind of morality of buffalo bill. wanting to be a woman, i do not believe that a section 8 is that different that what is going on, on that site. men do not lactate as of yet, and a mother's milk is one of the biggest stepping stones of a healthy baby. im not sure male prenancy serves any purpose. There is no population problem.
 
*[2]Nekked*
post Aug 14 2004, 07:00 PM
Post #3





Guest






QUOTE(sikdragon @ Aug 14 2004, 7:49 PM)
so what do they get a big ass c- section? im not sure i understand the concept, ok now that i have read it, i believe it is the same kind of morality of buffalo bill. wanting to be a woman, i do not believe that a section 8 is that different that what is going on, on that site. men do not lactate as of yet, and a mother's milk is one of the biggest stepping stones of a healthy baby. im not sure male prenancy serves any purpose. There is no population problem.

they have certain formulas for that or u can get a wet nurse.
 
sporadic
post Aug 14 2004, 07:02 PM
Post #4


and they say imitation is flattering
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,337
Joined: Jul 2004
Member No: 27,269



Hey, if men wanna go through that hell than I say go for it. I'm getting my husband to have the baby :P

Lol, we can alternate.
 
sweetdreamsx3
post Aug 14 2004, 07:13 PM
Post #5


Senior Member
*******

Group: Member
Posts: 5,585
Joined: Aug 2004
Member No: 38,082



I don't think it's immoral at all because guys are always saying that getting kicked in the balls hurts more than having a baby. I say we let them feel the pain!! LOL
 
Just_Dream
post Aug 14 2004, 07:23 PM
Post #6


durian
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 13,124
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 3,860



lol wow Trish you put this up happy.gif Anyways I think it's a big stepping stone. Even though women are naturally supposed to be the one, there are people out there that might not be able to carry the baby within them, thus their partner can. Plus, WOMEN are always complaining about the fact that they have to go through pregnancy and that men don't know how much pain it would be to go through that. Well, women, what we have here is a new breakthrough that could help men know how it feels like to be pregnant.

And also, let's not forget that there are some gay marriages that have happened, and of those gay marriages that are men, some MIGHT want to have children and bear their own, but cannot because women USED to be the only ones that could have children.

(sorry if some of what I'm saying doesn't make sense. It made sense in my head.)
 
sweetdreamsx3
post Aug 14 2004, 07:25 PM
Post #7


Senior Member
*******

Group: Member
Posts: 5,585
Joined: Aug 2004
Member No: 38,082



I think that makes complete sense. :D I mean the gay marriages especially because well their guys so yeaps.
 
ComradeRed
post Aug 14 2004, 09:37 PM
Post #8


Dark Lord of McCandless
******

Group: Member
Posts: 2,226
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,761



First of all, male pregnancy is junk science. Men do not have the biological machinery to maintain pregnancy, nor the immune mechanisms to defend the fetus. You would not only need gene splicing, but also very extensive surgery as well as technology that we dont have.
 
sporadic
post Aug 14 2004, 09:41 PM
Post #9


and they say imitation is flattering
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,337
Joined: Jul 2004
Member No: 27,269



Don't mean to sound apolcalyptic, but when men start having babies, I know that the end is around the corner.
 
ComradeRed
post Aug 14 2004, 09:42 PM
Post #10


Dark Lord of McCandless
******

Group: Member
Posts: 2,226
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,761



Why would they want to?
 
*Kathleen*
post Aug 14 2004, 09:53 PM
Post #11





Guest






Hmm...so now gay guys can get pregnant! Meh. I don't know. I just don't think that that's too safe. I mean, if men weren't designed to give birth to children, then they shouldn't. That's just my opinion.
 
hybrid
post Aug 14 2004, 09:56 PM
Post #12


pixel hybrid
*******

Group: Member
Posts: 6,410
Joined: Jan 2004
Member No: 1,081



QUOTE(Kathleen @ Aug 14 2004, 10:53 PM)
Hmm...so now gay guys can get pregnant! Meh. I don't know. I just don't think that that's too safe. I mean, if men weren't designed to give birth to children, then they shouldn't. That's just my opinion.

That's true. Sometimes science ruins the whole point of nature or something. Plus, if men could be pregnant then that would also add more to the population at some point then cause a famine.
 
*Kathleen*
post Aug 14 2004, 10:15 PM
Post #13





Guest






QUOTE
Plus, if men could be pregnant then that would also add more to the population at some point then cause a famine.

I don't know about that. Gays are a minority. wink.gif I doubt many straight guys would want to get pregnant.
 
hybrid
post Aug 14 2004, 10:20 PM
Post #14


pixel hybrid
*******

Group: Member
Posts: 6,410
Joined: Jan 2004
Member No: 1,081



QUOTE(Kathleen @ Aug 14 2004, 11:15 PM)
I don't know about that. Gays are a minority. wink.gif I doubt many straight guys would want to get pregnant.

Feminine guys might want to consider pregnancy... like Peter Griffin. rolleyes.gif
 
DarkCrescentMoon
post Aug 14 2004, 10:23 PM
Post #15


memories echo the silence
****

Group: Member
Posts: 171
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 24,624



wow...i never heard of that/... i guess he;d have to get a C section eh?

hmm...men getting pregnant....THE WORLD IS ENDING!
 
post Aug 14 2004, 10:27 PM
Post #16





Group:
Posts: 0
Joined: --
Member No: 0



oh ive seen this before, haha
well i guess its kinda kool d=

but then if all males can get pregnant whats the point of women...-.-
 
CrimsonArchangel
post Aug 14 2004, 10:28 PM
Post #17


Carried away
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 356
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 3,462



QUOTE(ComradeRed @ Aug 14 2004, 9:37 PM)
First of all, male pregnancy is junk science. Men do not have the biological machinery to maintain pregnancy, nor the immune mechanisms to defend the fetus. You would not only need gene splicing, but also very extensive surgery as well as technology that we dont have.

Agree.

Do not support the concept at all.
 
capsule
post Aug 14 2004, 11:53 PM
Post #18


ㅋㅋㅋ
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 924
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 24,283



bunch of bs. IF he gets a baby, it'll probably be deformed or something (i dont care if it says otherwise on that webpage).

Human cloning (yet to happen, but still), male pregnancy, tongue splicing....what's going on? mellow.gif
 
sporadic
post Aug 15 2004, 12:33 AM
Post #19


and they say imitation is flattering
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,337
Joined: Jul 2004
Member No: 27,269



What if they gave him a uterus and everything? That would be weird
What if he grew breasts? @_@
 
*[2]Nekked*
post Aug 15 2004, 01:12 AM
Post #20





Guest






THIS IS NOT A DEBATE ON WHETHER ITS REAL OR NOT. ITS A DEBATE ON IF MALES SHOULD BE ABLE TO GET PREGNANT; IF ITS IMMORAL OR NOT, ARE YOU PRO OR CON? SO STOP TRYING TO BE SMARTASSES AND SAYING " OH WELL THATS PROBABLY NOT EVEN REAL.EWWW" BECAUSE I REALLY COULDNT GIVE LESS OF A CRAP.
 
capsule
post Aug 15 2004, 01:47 AM
Post #21


ㅋㅋㅋ
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 924
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 24,283



alright, lemme post up my thoughts on this:

im totally against male pregnancy because it just wasn't meant to be. im a christian, and I believe God created WOMEN to be pregnant, not man. I don't care if somehow science comes up with a way on having the opposite gender be able to become pregnant, its just wrong. I think male pregnancy only offends women going through pregnancy, and that they are taking roles that shouldn't be theirs. If man wants a child, theres adoption. this is an abomination before God :T If God wanted males to be able to reproduce, he would have done so. Man is only going against God's law by performing these horrifying experiments...or what they call, "science". _dry.gif
 
F1R3B4T
post Aug 15 2004, 02:43 AM
Post #22


Senior Member
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,384
Joined: Aug 2004
Member No: 37,337



QUOTE(somechinkgirl @ Aug 14 2004, 7:13 PM)
I don't think it's immoral at all because guys are always saying that getting kicked in the balls hurts more than having a baby. I say we let them feel the pain!! LOL

excuse me.
getting kicked in the balls hurts SO FRIGGN MUCH. i've xperienced it b4, NOT a good feeling. thers this pain in the stomach that dwells for a few days.


QUOTE
Feminine guys might want to consider pregnancy... like Peter Griffin. 

lmao peter griffin i still remember that episode..

as for male pregnancy, stubborn.gif men were not made to bear children. just doesn't seem right to change that in such a way that it becomes possible.

hmm the men are against it and the women are for it... (sry to state the obvious)
 
tootsie_kiddo
post Aug 15 2004, 09:20 AM
Post #23


Your love is a razorblade kiss ♥
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,794
Joined: Apr 2004
Member No: 9,959



QUOTE(Thradrien_Blake @ Aug 15 2004, 2:33 PM)
What if they gave him a uterus and everything? That would be weird
What if he grew breasts? @_@

o wow... dat is scary ohmy.gif
 
*[2]Nekked*
post Aug 15 2004, 10:21 AM
Post #24





Guest






QUOTE(F1R3B4T @ Aug 15 2004, 3:43 AM)
excuse me.
getting kicked in the balls hurts SO FRIGGN MUCH. i've xperienced it b4, NOT a good feeling. thers this pain in the stomach that dwells for a few days.



lmao peter griffin i still remember that episode..

as for male pregnancy, stubborn.gif men were not made to bear children. just doesn't seem right to change that in such a way that it becomes possible.

hmm the men are against it and the women are for it... (sry to state the obvious)

QUOTE
Mr. Lee:
Well, I understand how it may be a shocking concept at first. Biologically, women have always given birth to children, and men have not. Despite the dramatic results of the sexual revolution in the latter half of this century, there are still very distinct and concrete social roles determined by this... until now... undeniable biological fact. Now, it seems, we have several important questions to consider. Why shouldn't men carry children and care for a fetus the same way a women does? Why shouldn't a man bear a burden that women have always carried? On the other hand, why shouldn't a man be able to experience the same joy and excitement that a pregnant woman feels nurturing a child within her own body? Now I think men, as well as women, have more choices, more possibilities, more roles they can assume in their lives.
 
*Weird addiction*
post Aug 15 2004, 10:29 AM
Post #25





Guest






uHH???
 

5 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 
Closed TopicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: