Log In · Register

 

Debate Rules

Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.

Debate.

4 Pages V   1 2 3 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
what gives us the right...
princess2113
post Jul 1 2004, 08:42 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 811
Joined: Apr 2004
Member No: 11,377



y does America try to control other countries...i mean we want them to be free...but like Japan, we dont let them have weapons...dont get me wrong i know its for our protection...it just seems like we alwayz get exactly what we want, and when we dont...there goes a war
 
EmeraldKnight
post Jul 1 2004, 08:43 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,795
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,421



QUOTE
y does America try to control other countries...i mean we want them to be free...but like Japan, we dont let them have weapons...dont get me wrong i know its for our protection...it just seems like we alwayz get exactly what we want, and when we dont...there goes a war 

Yeah.. we dont have the right, its realli stupid and arrogant of our leaders to think that.. they're building up an American Empire.. i think someone paralled this to Rome..
 
LiNHy POO
post Jul 1 2004, 10:41 PM
Post #3


WUT THA DUCK?
*******

Group: Member
Posts: 3,950
Joined: Apr 2004
Member No: 14,138



yehh i agree... who made us the ruling country? i guess since our country is more stable than others... and we're trying to help the other countries out? well sumthing like that!!
 
immersion31
post Jul 1 2004, 10:44 PM
Post #4


Senior Member
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 943
Joined: Jan 2004
Member No: 1,007



hmm...never really noticed that. i say that we should jus mind our own n yea. still good to help though...
 
Spirited Away
post Jul 1 2004, 10:45 PM
Post #5


Quand j'étais jeune...
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 6,826
Joined: Jan 2004
Member No: 1,272



QUOTE(princess2113 @ Jul 1 2004, 8:42 PM)
y does America try to control other countries...i mean we want them to be free...but like Japan, we dont let them have weapons...dont get me wrong i know its for our protection...it just seems like we alwayz get exactly what we want, and when we dont...there goes a war

I'm not too sure about this, so correct me if I'm wrong.. BUT

Japan doesn't have a much of a military compare to the USA. Infact, someone told me that they depend on American military more than ever simply because their tax money goes towards education the most and the least goes to military, or something like that. I'm sure they don't mind US presence in their country.
 
ryfitaDF
post Jul 1 2004, 10:55 PM
Post #6


LunchboxXx
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,789
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,810



don't you mean korea? i've never heard of japan having any weapons...

but since teddy roosevelt we've been "the constable of the world", but now it seems like we're just bossing everyone around.
 
EmeraldKnight
post Jul 1 2004, 10:58 PM
Post #7


Senior Member
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,795
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,421



QUOTE
I'm not too sure about this, so correct me if I'm wrong.. BUT

Japan doesn't have a much of a military compare to the USA. Infact, someone told me that they depend on American military more than ever simply because their tax money goes towards education the most and the least goes to military, or something like that. I'm sure they don't mind US presence in their country.

Yeah.. I think that's right.. but Japan's more of an example.. I mean.. like Iraq or something, and the ongoing war on terrorism (which has no foreseeable end as of yet..).. why should we police the world? We dont even wait for UN approval anymore.. this country seems to be taking a turn down a very dark road..

EDIT://
QUOTE
but since teddy roosevelt we've been "the constable of the world", but now it seems like we're just bossing everyone around. 

Exactly.. it seems like the onli valid opinion, the onli valid government (for example), is our own.. if other countries dont model after us, they're wrong.. at least that seems to be the attitude the politicians are taking..
 
DisneyPrincessKa...
post Jul 2 2004, 05:08 AM
Post #8


I wanna be roman
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,844
Joined: Jan 2004
Member No: 989



QUOTE(EmeraldKnight @ Jul 1 2004, 11:58 PM)
Yeah.. I think that's right.. but Japan's more of an example.. I mean.. like Iraq or something, and the ongoing war on terrorism (which has no foreseeable end as of yet..).. why should we police the world? We dont even wait for UN approval anymore.. this country seems to be taking a turn down a very dark road..

You're kidding right? We aren't in Iraq to police the world! We're in Iraq because they attacked us and we retaliated! Doesn't anyone remember 9/11? Also, they said the war would take a long time. They said that from the very beginning of the whole ordeal. Guess what though, it's been going much faster than expected.
 
princess2113
post Jul 2 2004, 08:40 AM
Post #9


Senior Member
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 811
Joined: Apr 2004
Member No: 11,377



[QUOTE]I'm not too sure about this, so correct me if I'm wrong.. BUT
Japan doesn't have a much of a military compare to the USA. Infact, someone told me that they depend on American military more than ever simply because their tax money goes towards education the most and the least goes to military, or something like that. I'm sure they don't mind US presence in their
country. [QUOTE]
thats b/c we limit how much military they can have...im not trying to critize the government, it just seems wrong
 
*kryogenix*
post Jul 2 2004, 09:50 AM
Post #10





Guest






QUOTE(princess2113 @ Jul 1 2004, 8:42 PM)
but like Japan, we dont let them have weapons...dont get me wrong i know its for our protection...it just seems like we alwayz get exactly what we want, and when we dont...there goes a war

maybe because the japanese said they would only make a defense force and never declare war again? the JASDF does have plenty of weapons. here, take a look at some:

http://globalsecurity.org/military/world/japan/weapons.htm
http://globalsecurity.org/military/world/japan/ship.htm
 
onenonly101
post Jul 2 2004, 09:58 AM
Post #11


i'm too cool 4 school
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 752
Joined: Mar 2004
Member No: 7,421



QUOTE(DisneyPrincessKate @ Jul 2 2004, 5:08 AM)
You're kidding right? We aren't in Iraq to police the world! We're in Iraq because they attacked us and we retaliated! Doesn't anyone remember 9/11? Also, they said the war would take a long time. They said that from the very beginning of the whole ordeal. Guess what though, it's been going much faster than expected.

:errm: As I recall, Iraq did not strike us first. Iraq did not make 9/11 happen.

Sure it is going much fatser......running the country into the ground. We want to say oh yeah an Iraqi government, but want to get upset when the president does not want out presence there.
 
ComradeRed
post Jul 2 2004, 11:30 AM
Post #12


Dark Lord of McCandless
******

Group: Member
Posts: 2,226
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,761



We can't afford to police the world. We blow up people who haven't done anything, they pick up guns and shoot at us, and meanwhile we're spending $100 billion to build roads ofr a country with no cars.
 
*Kathleen*
post Jul 2 2004, 01:31 PM
Post #13





Guest






QUOTE
As I recall, Iraq did not strike us first. Iraq did not make 9/11 happen.

Yes, but their brutal dictator, Saddam, had connections to terrorists and Bush declared a war on terror after 9/11.
 
ComradeRed
post Jul 2 2004, 03:02 PM
Post #14


Dark Lord of McCandless
******

Group: Member
Posts: 2,226
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,761



There is not a single shred of evidence that Saddam Hussein had terrorist ties.

In fact, Bin Laden was trying to overthrow Hussein since he got into power.
 
XaZnX07
post Jul 2 2004, 03:44 PM
Post #15


Senior Member
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,443
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 18,050



wow never thought of that now that i did wow interesting hmmmm............







.:tony:.
 
DisneyPrincessKa...
post Jul 2 2004, 05:27 PM
Post #16


I wanna be roman
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,844
Joined: Jan 2004
Member No: 989



QUOTE(onenonly101 @ Jul 2 2004, 10:58 AM)
:errm: As I recall, Iraq did not strike us first. Iraq did not make 9/11 happen.

Sure it is going much fatser......running the country into the ground. We want to say oh yeah an Iraqi government, but want to get upset when the president does not want out presence there.

There are terrorists in Iraq. Terrorists who flew planes into the World Trade Centers and Pentagon, killing thousands of people. Now we're going after them for killing Americans. True, it wasn't Iraq, but the Alquidea is in Iraq, and they were the guys behind 9/11. (I know that I spelled Alquidea wrong, sorry bout that)

And for pete sakes! The country may not be doing as well as is was before the war, but this is nothing compared to the great depression.
 
ComradeRed
post Jul 2 2004, 05:29 PM
Post #17


Dark Lord of McCandless
******

Group: Member
Posts: 2,226
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,761



Of course, Al Qaeda is based in Afghanistan and all the hijackers were from Saudi Arabia.

How does Iraq figure into that?
 
JlIaTMK
post Jul 2 2004, 06:40 PM
Post #18


Senior Member
*******

Group: Member
Posts: 7,048
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 22,696



QUOTE(DisneyPrincessKate @ Jul 2 2004, 5:27 PM)
There are terrorists in Iraq. Terrorists who flew planes into the World Trade Centers and Pentagon, killing thousands of people. Now we're going after them for killing Americans. True, it wasn't Iraq, but the Alquidea is in Iraq, and they were the guys behind 9/11. (I know that I spelled Alquidea wrong, sorry bout that)

And for pete sakes! The country may not be doing as well as is was before the war, but this is nothing compared to the great depression.

ok bud but we supposedly went into Iraq for the reason of Saddam Hussien.... not for the terrorists....
 
EmeraldKnight
post Jul 2 2004, 11:44 PM
Post #19


Senior Member
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,795
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,421



QUOTE
We can't afford to police the world. We blow up people who haven't done anything, they pick up guns and shoot at us, and meanwhile we're spending $100 billion to build roads ofr a country with no cars. 

Exactly, excellent point.

QUOTE
Sure it is going much fatser......running the country into the ground. We want to say oh yeah an Iraqi government, but want to get upset when the president does not want out presence there.

How is it going much faster?

QUOTE
Yes, but their brutal dictator, Saddam, had connections to terrorists and Bush declared a war on terror after 9/11.

QUOTE
There are terrorists in Iraq. Terrorists who flew planes into the World Trade Centers and Pentagon, killing thousands of people. Now we're going after them for killing Americans. True, it wasn't Iraq, but the Alquidea is in Iraq, and they were the guys behind 9/11. (I know that I spelled Alquidea wrong, sorry bout that)

So we should go and invade every single country with connections to terrorists?

QUOTE
And for pete sakes! The country may not be doing as well as is was before the war, but this is nothing compared to the great depression.

The Great Depression was extreme.. but at the rate things are going...
 
PinoyOtaku
post Jul 2 2004, 11:54 PM
Post #20


Mileage Runner
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,316
Joined: Mar 2004
Member No: 9,458



QUOTE(kryogenix @ Jul 2 2004, 6:50 AM)
maybe because the japanese said they would only make a defense force and never declare war again? the JASDF does have plenty of weapons. here, take a look at some:

http://globalsecurity.org/military/world/japan/weapons.htm
http://globalsecurity.org/military/world/japan/ship.htm

Aww you beated me to it. cry.gif

BTW don't forget the JGSDF and JMSDF. happy.gif

QUOTE
There are terrorists in Iraq.  Terrorists who flew planes into the World Trade Centers and Pentagon, killing thousands of people.  Now we're going after them for killing Americans.  True, it wasn't Iraq, but the Alquidea is in Iraq, and they were the guys behind 9/11.  (I know that I spelled Alquidea wrong, sorry bout that)

And for pete sakes!  The country may not be doing as well as is was before the war, but this is nothing compared to the great depression.


I'm a believer that Al Qaeda had no ties with Iraq nor Iraq housing terrorists until the war and occupation.
 
EmeraldKnight
post Jul 3 2004, 12:05 AM
Post #21


Senior Member
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,795
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,421



QUOTE
BTW don't forget the JGSDF and JMSDF. 

What are those? blink.gif

QUOTE
I'm a believer that Al Qaeda had no ties with Iraq nor Iraq housing terrorists until the war and occupation. 

Supposedly they did have ties... supposedly.. though I'm disinclined to believe stuff coming out of the White House anymore..

How did this debate turn into focusing on Iraq all of a sudden?
 
rOckThISshYt
post Jul 3 2004, 03:28 AM
Post #22


Live Your Own Party
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,261
Joined: Mar 2004
Member No: 7,489



i agree with you, kelly. we try to take over other countries, inderectly. but we try to flash our power and wealth (even though we're in debt right now. thanks to our wonderful *sarcastic* president bush. he's ditching our economy while playing golf _dry.gif). so, really, what does give us that right? blink.gif
 
onenonly101
post Jul 3 2004, 10:49 AM
Post #23


i'm too cool 4 school
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 752
Joined: Mar 2004
Member No: 7,421



QUOTE
Of course, Al Qaeda is based in Afghanistan and all the hijackers were from Saudi Arabia.

How does Iraq figure into that?


I was about to say the same thing. People don't realize that they came from Saudi, and they are in fact Saudi and not Iraqi.

QUOTE
How is it going much faster?


The person before me said something about the war going fast and the country getting better faster. And i diagree. I think sure it has moved fast, us running their country into the ground. Right now i 'm like we need to get out. If they want to kill each other and have a coup every new years, let them it is their country and their right.
 
EmeraldKnight
post Jul 3 2004, 10:08 PM
Post #24


Senior Member
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,795
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,421



Still not sure why everyone's focusing on arguing Iraq.. but it seems like no one believes we have the right to do so..
 
kyuubi319
post Jul 3 2004, 11:00 PM
Post #25


I am Sandy. Hear me roar.
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,152
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 15,896



i wouldnt say we're bossing the other countries around, but taking all of it into consideration, we're probably the most stable and well off, and if we didnt but in every now an then, there'd be missiles flying everywhere.
 

4 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: