Log In · Register

 

Debate Rules

Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.

Debate.

condoms, should be distributed at school?
*NatiMarie*
post May 13 2004, 09:24 PM
Post #1





Guest






Ok, I hope this is PG-13 but this isn't really nasty or supposed to be, but the question in the matter is:

Should condoms be distributed at school? Why or why not?

(i.e.: to prevent pregnancies, STDs, etc.)

What do you think?
 
13 Pages V  « < 2 3 4 5 6 > »   
Start new topic
Replies (75 - 99)
ComradeRed
post Jul 4 2004, 11:47 PM
Post #76


Dark Lord of McCandless
******

Group: Member
Posts: 2,226
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,761



QUOTE(EmeraldKnight @ Jul 4 2004, 11:44 PM)
Its illegal here..


Why should it be legalized?

1) Where is "here"?

2) It should be legalized because it is a victimless crime. The only way to enforce laws against a victimless crime is to violate the privacy of innocent people -- which does more damage in the long-run than the victimless crime itself. No one is harmed, so no one reports the crime. Therefore, the police cannot catch anyone, or even know that crimes occur, unless they spy on people, violating their legal due process rights under the Fourth Amendment. Now pedophilia is different. If a kid is seriously too young that it is considered exploitation, then the parents of the kid should be able to report the crime. But if it's a 16 year old, then no crime will be reported. The only way to enforce laws, therefore, is to snoop into people's private business. Sex is not the government's business.
 
EmeraldKnight
post Jul 4 2004, 11:51 PM
Post #77


Senior Member
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,795
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,421



QUOTE
1) Where is "here"?

2) It should be legalized because it is a victimless crime. The only way to enforce laws against a victimless crime is to violate the privacy of innocent people -- which does more damage in the long-run than the victimless crime itself. No one is harmed, so no one reports the crime. Therefore, the police cannot catch anyone, or even know that crimes occur, unless they spy on people, violating their legal due process rights under the Fourth Amendment. Now pedophilia is different. If a kid is seriously too young that it is considered exploitation, then the parents of the kid should be able to report the crime. But if it's a 16 year old, then no crime will be reported. The only way to enforce laws, therefore, is to snoop into people's private business. Sex is not the government's business.

1. Here is California where its supposedly illegal (at least my Health Ed. teacher said that)
2. Well if the minor comes forward and reports it or something? Snooping isnt required to enforce it.. I mean.. ok, the police shouldnt be out looking for cases like that, but if one is reported.. why should it be legalized?
 
ComradeRed
post Jul 5 2004, 05:30 PM
Post #78


Dark Lord of McCandless
******

Group: Member
Posts: 2,226
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,761



QUOTE(EmeraldKnight @ Jul 4 2004, 11:51 PM)
1. Here is California where its supposedly illegal (at least my Health Ed. teacher said that)
2. Well if the minor comes forward and reports it or something? Snooping isnt required to enforce it.. I mean.. ok, the police shouldnt be out looking for cases like that, but if one is reported.. why should it be legalized?

1) Your health ed teacher is probably lying... California being a liberal state and all.

2) If the minor comes forward and reports it, the chance of that is almost zero. And when a teenager does report that, most of the time it would be just to get back at the person older than 18, even though the teenager is just as responsible. There is too much room for abuse in this situation. People are sexually mature after puberty. After puberty, they are biologically meant to have sex. That's how it is. Creating a legal fiction above that is only going to cause more harm.
 
ryfitaDF
post Jul 5 2004, 05:39 PM
Post #79


LunchboxXx
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,789
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,810



QUOTE
2. Its illegal for minors to have sex, even with each other


i know alot more felons than i thought tongue.gif
 
EmeraldKnight
post Jul 5 2004, 09:29 PM
Post #80


Senior Member
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,795
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,421



QUOTE
1) Your health ed teacher is probably lying... California being a liberal state and all.

*shrug*

QUOTE
2) If the minor comes forward and reports it, the chance of that is almost zero. And when a teenager does report that, most of the time it would be just to get back at the person older than 18, even though the teenager is just as responsible. There is too much room for abuse in this situation. People are sexually mature after puberty. After puberty, they are biologically meant to have sex. That's how it is. Creating a legal fiction above that is only going to cause more harm.

How is it causing harm? I dont see that..
 
SarahxJoy
post Jul 5 2004, 09:52 PM
Post #81


What the fack.
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 6,164
Joined: Mar 2004
Member No: 8,519



Well, guys at my school already hand out condoms to their friends. blink.gif I mean I guess it has its ups and downs. You wouldn't have to go to the store. But, yeah, it's like encouraging them to have sex. But at least, it'd be SAFE sex. huh.gif
 
EmeraldKnight
post Jul 5 2004, 10:08 PM
Post #82


Senior Member
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,795
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,421



QUOTE
Well, guys at my school already hand out condoms to their friends.  I mean I guess it has its ups and downs. You wouldn't have to go to the store. But, yeah, it's like encouraging them to have sex. But at least, it'd be SAFE sex. 

Its not encouraging them.. its acknowledging the fact that they will have sex.. and besides, its not like the school hands it out to everyone, just the people who ask (at least that's how it works here..)
 
jasonjasonjason
post Jul 5 2004, 10:48 PM
Post #83


blah blah
****

Group: Member
Posts: 196
Joined: Jul 2004
Member No: 27,277



nah, i dont think its a good idea. it would just encourage more sex. if ppl really want to have sex, then they should take the resposibility and go get their own condoms at a drug store or wherever.
 
EmeraldKnight
post Jul 5 2004, 10:56 PM
Post #84


Senior Member
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,795
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,421



QUOTE
nah, i dont think its a good idea. it would just encourage more sex. if ppl really want to have sex, then they should take the resposibility and go get their own condoms at a drug store or wherever.

But that's just it.. teenagers dont like to do that.. its better to be safe and have them available at school..

Seriously.. teenagers and responsible... isnt exactly the most common combination, sadly enough..
 
ComradeRed
post Jul 6 2004, 12:36 PM
Post #85


Dark Lord of McCandless
******

Group: Member
Posts: 2,226
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,761



QUOTE(EmeraldKnight @ Jul 5 2004, 9:29 PM)
*shrug*


How is it causing harm? I dont see that..

It would cause harm because people would simply exploit the law to "get back" at boyfriends/girlfriends, even when they were just as responsible for hte sex.
 
someflipguy
post Jul 6 2004, 01:33 PM
Post #86


I can't believe its not "Ryan"
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,981
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 21,368



Heck yeah...why not I say? People are going to do so at least promote safe sex! Those things can get costly..haha!!
 
kantoaznboi
post Jul 7 2004, 02:51 AM
Post #87


Future Mr. Kelly Clarkson
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,268
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 3,552



yea i agree wit ^^^^^

its not like ppl rnt having sex, so y not make sure they r using protection when they are having sexual relations with others.

and u dont really have 2 pass it out, but make it avaliable for the students 2 get without embarassment, so that those that are participating in intercourse, can get the condoms.
 
EmeraldKnight
post Jul 7 2004, 09:42 AM
Post #88


Senior Member
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,795
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,421



QUOTE
yea i agree wit ^^^^^

its not like ppl rnt having sex, so y not make sure they r using protection when they are having sexual relations with others.

and u dont really have 2 pass it out, but make it avaliable for the students 2 get without embarassment, so that those that are participating in intercourse, can get the condoms.

Yup, my point exactly; people are saying that the teens should buy them themselves at the pharmacy.. but they dont like to do that because they may feel embarassed; and the school making it available without embarassment helps
 
vynni3
post Jul 7 2004, 03:51 PM
Post #89


Senior Member
****

Group: Member
Posts: 125
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 23,200



yes distrubution of it is needed cz teens are often time lazy and of course embarassed to buy em the hassles!!
so it should be !
 
forgottenrazor
post Jul 11 2004, 05:51 PM
Post #90


Senior Member
***

Group: Member
Posts: 63
Joined: Jul 2004
Member No: 28,218



yea they distribute them in my school you just have to go to the nurses office.
 
islandkiss
post Jul 12 2004, 09:54 PM
Post #91


Kermit the frog = <3
******

Group: Member
Posts: 2,315
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 15,215



nope. Condoms don't protect against stds.. to me, it would feel like our schools were inforcing/encouraging us to have sex..
 
*NatiMarie*
post Jul 12 2004, 09:58 PM
Post #92





Guest






QUOTE(x3_kelly @ Jul 12 2004, 7:54 PM)
nope. Condoms don't protect against stds.. to me, it would feel like our schools were inforcing us to have sex..

Not really...schools just want protection. Whoever wants to get them it's their business. It's a lot about morals too. I mean, like me personally, I wouldn't get a condom, even if they were free. Schools aren't handing them out, just saying that they have them for whoever wants them. =\
For crazy teens...bleah
 
EmeraldKnight
post Jul 12 2004, 11:50 PM
Post #93


Senior Member
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,795
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,421



QUOTE
nope. Condoms don't protect against stds.. to me, it would feel like our schools were inforcing/encouraging us to have sex..

They're better protection than nothing..

QUOTE
Not really...schools just want protection. Whoever wants to get them it's their business. It's a lot about morals too. I mean, like me personally, I wouldn't get a condom, even if they were free. Schools aren't handing them out, just saying that they have them for whoever wants them. =\
For crazy teens...bleah

I agree completely ^
 
Sumiaki
post Jul 13 2004, 12:09 AM
Post #94


NO WAI! R u Srs?
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,264
Joined: Jul 2004
Member No: 28,094



QUOTE(x3_kelly @ Jul 12 2004, 9:54 PM)
nope. Condoms don't protect against stds.. to me, it would feel like our schools were inforcing/encouraging us to have sex..

Actually where did you hear that? I believe they DO protect against STD's. Maybe you're thinking of birth control pills. Well if im wrong (which i doubt) condoms still prevent against teen pregnancy. Schools would be encouraging us to have sex if they handed out condoms to everyone. My school has them available if you ask.
 
visualfusion
post Jul 13 2004, 02:19 AM
Post #95


Senior Member
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 699
Joined: Mar 2004
Member No: 7,274



Even though distributing condoms will be somewhat of an "encouragement" from schools to have sex, it's better than not having them at all. Kids are stupid, I know, I am one, and either way they'll do it, so why not have it the safe (99% lab results my ass, more like 70%) way?
 
HiddenFaerie
post Jul 13 2004, 08:58 AM
Post #96


Origami. Not Ori-gasms ^.^
***

Group: Member
Posts: 91
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 25,202



I suppose it's a good idea. Although it would be encouraging to curious teenagers, but at least it's better than teenagers getting curious without them. biggrin.gif

But of coarse theres always the fact that most of your teachers will know your having sex. Which I guess is sort of awkward.
 
EmeraldKnight
post Jul 13 2004, 10:15 AM
Post #97


Senior Member
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,795
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,421



QUOTE
But of coarse theres always the fact that most of your teachers will know your having sex. Which I guess is sort of awkward.

No they wont; my school has them avaliable anonymously at the nurses office.. no one has to know, kids'll use it and be safer..
 
redsoxbaby87
post Jul 14 2004, 02:20 PM
Post #98


*hugs for strangers*redsox*
****

Group: Member
Posts: 151
Joined: Jul 2004
Member No: 29,304



no. parents would never agree.
 
EmeraldKnight
post Jul 14 2004, 03:54 PM
Post #99


Senior Member
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,795
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,421



QUOTE
no. parents would never agree.

Actually they will and they do.. our school does it, parents know about it, so obviously they agree that its for the better..

They dont want their kids to be sexually active, but they acknowledge that they cant supervise them 24/7 so its better for the schools to offer confidential protection
 
aud_chua
post Jul 16 2004, 05:31 PM
Post #100


!shobe!
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 664
Joined: Mar 2004
Member No: 5,912



no.. i disagree with that.. i don't like the fact that some people make a joke out of it and open the wrappers and toss the condom around the school.. it's just annoying.. plus.. is the school promoting sex...? i don't like the idea of pre-marital sex.. and if the couple is smart, they wouldn't even need the condom cuz they wouldn't have sex...
 

13 Pages V  « < 2 3 4 5 6 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: