Myspace Profile 2.0 = ?? |
![]() ![]() |
Myspace Profile 2.0 = ?? |
![]()
Post
#26
|
|
![]() Treasure Pleasure ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Head Staff Posts: 11,193 Joined: Oct 2005 Member No: 281,127 ![]() |
Yeah, and this tutorial would definitely help a lot.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#27
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 70 Joined: Aug 2008 Member No: 680,835 ![]() |
i dont like the new one i just use the regular one wich is all html because that i find more easier for me
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#28
|
|
![]() Treasure Pleasure ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Head Staff Posts: 11,193 Joined: Oct 2005 Member No: 281,127 ![]() |
^It's always easier to stick with what you already have because you've been so used to it for so long. But y'know, the new version is actually a lot easier to work around than you'd think.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#29
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Member Posts: 1 Joined: Dec 2008 Member No: 703,783 ![]() |
Hopefully this hasn't been covered elsewhere, but this was the only relevant thread I found.
http://developer.myspace.com/Community/forums/t/6291.aspx I'm very curious as to why Myspace so severely hobbled developers when it comes to CSS? Is there any valid excuse for it? Any reasonable justification? I would like to see some pressure put on Myspace to make the 2.0 Profiles a little less ... well, crappy to be honest, when it comes to themeability. They are forcing developers to stick with the old 1.0 themes to be able to really customize them for different browsers etc. And who knows how long the 1.0 themes are going to be supported? The link above is my thread on the Myspace developer forum where I posted about this issue. You'll see there that Myspace isn't being very helpful when it comes to getting questions answered about the issue. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#30
|
|
![]() simple and clean... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Designer Posts: 149 Joined: Nov 2006 Member No: 478,009 ![]() |
Try to use more specific names to style the !important things, for example, div#module instead of #module. It works for me.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#31
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 13 Joined: Mar 2009 Member No: 719,415 ![]() |
Hi! So everything sounds great and nice and everything but how can I use my "DIV Overlay Layout" over the "2.0"???? It seems that the news of TOM is brandnew... aym I just recently stumbled across this tut for 2.0 divs. Thouht it would be helpful. Eileen's Blog |
|
|
![]()
Post
#32
|
|
![]() Senior Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 1,507 Joined: Sep 2007 Member No: 571,541 ![]() |
um Mike, what you had said earlier about viewing the source code..
it doesnt show the attributes used to customize the layout.. it only shows the coding that was used to make the layout.. like the names and other stuff about the modules.. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#33
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 1,237 Joined: May 2008 Member No: 648,123 ![]() |
^ the styles you use on your own profile is the last CSS document in that list. it does need your friend ID to work, though.
CODE http://www.myspace.com/Modules/PageEditor/Handlers/ProfileCss.ashx?userId=XXXXXX
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#34
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 1,237 Joined: May 2008 Member No: 648,123 ![]() |
yeah, but you know some of the people here. just thought i'd mention it so they wouldn't ask 20 questions about why it won't work. ;)
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#35
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Head Staff Posts: 18,173 Joined: Mar 2005 Member No: 108,478 ![]() |
Topic Closed, and Moved to Myspace Resolved Topics. Please PM a moderator if you would like this reopened.
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |