Profile 2.0 |
![]() ![]() |
Profile 2.0 |
Nov 14 2008, 08:50 AM
Post
#26
|
|
![]() AIDS at RAVES. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Designer Posts: 2,386 Joined: Dec 2007 Member No: 598,878 |
^ it's also very handy for those who are familiar with it. it's all around easier; there are no tables to deal with anymore, and you can customize it to no ends. the little curved corners around the "modules"; you can change those borders with your own images. you can put friends and comments in separate scrolling divs (on 1.0 you could move them separately, but not so they scrolled). you can hide your entire profile with one line of code, without customizing your own profile by removing each section individually—perfect for people who make layouts for the public. people were pleased when they found out they could replace the "blurbs" with your own image. now you can replace "blurbs," "about me," "who i'd like to meet," etc. with your own images without hiding the .orangetext15 class (since that's not even there anymore). basically, it's more search engine friendly (perfect for companies and bands), and you can edit just about every aspect of it with CSS. honestly, i love 2.0. me too:] I love 2.0 because of the fact that they are all in div modules now, instead of stupid nested tables. :]. Its web 2.0 friendlier :] |
|
|
|
Nov 14 2008, 11:34 AM
Post
#27
|
|
![]() Cornflakes :D ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,541 Joined: Dec 2005 Member No: 322,923 |
|
|
|
|
Nov 15 2008, 01:08 AM
Post
#28
|
|
|
Alternate Rock beats paper. ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 71 Joined: Oct 2008 Member No: 693,799 |
Nope, don't like it.
It looks nice and its pretty good. But whats will the websites that spent all their hard work on V1 layouts do? |
|
|
|
Nov 15 2008, 02:29 PM
Post
#29
|
|
|
Alternate Rock beats paper. ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 71 Joined: Oct 2008 Member No: 693,799 |
I'm saying if Myspace permanently switched to Profile V2.
|
|
|
|
Nov 16 2008, 10:40 AM
Post
#30
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Head Staff Posts: 18,173 Joined: Mar 2005 Member No: 108,478 |
|
|
|
|
Nov 23 2008, 09:18 PM
Post
#31
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 734 Joined: Oct 2005 Member No: 278,251 |
I don't think you can make your profile private either...?
|
|
|
|
Dec 1 2008, 09:29 AM
Post
#32
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 32 Joined: Dec 2008 Member No: 701,132 |
i think its cool to see but i hate to use it i do not like it for my profile at alL!
|
|
|
|
Dec 1 2008, 06:33 PM
Post
#33
|
|
![]() All that you see or seem, is but a dream within a dream ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 196 Joined: Mar 2005 Member No: 115,956 |
It could have some cool options in it, but it really annoys me that the 1.0 css won't work with it. x_X I just made a bunch new 1.0 layouts for me site, too.
I hope it doesn't force us to eventually ONLY use 2.0. That would be a lot of work to change all the old layouts over to the new coding. x_x |
|
|
|
Dec 1 2008, 07:36 PM
Post
#34
|
|
![]() <3 ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 15 Joined: Feb 2008 Member No: 624,827 |
You can make your profile private.
The navigation is just as easy to edit (if not easier) Personally, I like 2.0. It's easier to edit. |
|
|
|
Dec 1 2008, 11:11 PM
Post
#35
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 29 Joined: Nov 2008 Member No: 696,434 |
That it no longer uses tables.
Having modules viewable to a specific category. Not having to worry about using IE/Safari/Opera browser hacks. |
|
|
|
Dec 2 2008, 06:25 PM
Post
#36
|
|
![]() -N[dot]Shae- ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 36 Joined: Jul 2008 Member No: 668,276 |
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |