Log In · Register

 

Resource Center Links


This Month's Contests | Hosts Looking for Hostees | Hostees looking for Hosts | Big Book of Resources

Submission Guidelines

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Profile 2.0
synatribe
post Nov 14 2008, 08:50 AM
Post #26


AIDS at RAVES.
******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 2,386
Joined: Dec 2007
Member No: 598,878



QUOTE(fixtatik @ Nov 13 2008, 10:29 PM) *
^ it's also very handy for those who are familiar with it. it's all around easier; there are no tables to deal with anymore, and you can customize it to no ends. the little curved corners around the "modules"; you can change those borders with your own images. you can put friends and comments in separate scrolling divs (on 1.0 you could move them separately, but not so they scrolled). you can hide your entire profile with one line of code, without customizing your own profile by removing each section individually—perfect for people who make layouts for the public.

people were pleased when they found out they could replace the "blurbs" with your own image. now you can replace "blurbs," "about me," "who i'd like to meet," etc. with your own images without hiding the .orangetext15 class (since that's not even there anymore).

basically, it's more search engine friendly (perfect for companies and bands), and you can edit just about every aspect of it with CSS. honestly, i love 2.0.


me too:] I love 2.0 because of the fact that they are all in div modules now, instead of stupid nested tables. :]. Its web 2.0 friendlier :]
 
Insurmountable
post Nov 14 2008, 11:34 AM
Post #27


Cornflakes :D
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 4,541
Joined: Dec 2005
Member No: 322,923



QUOTE(brooklyneast05 @ Nov 14 2008, 07:43 AM) *
i think a huge plus is the fact it re-sizes pictures to fit into the tables. now i won't go to a page and see some idiot putting a 700x500 picture in their interest section anymore with horizontal scroll bars everywhere.



haha! I completely agree!
 
amplifyy
post Nov 15 2008, 01:08 AM
Post #28


Alternate Rock beats paper.
***

Group: Member
Posts: 71
Joined: Oct 2008
Member No: 693,799



Nope, don't like it.
It looks nice and its pretty good.
But whats will the websites that spent all their hard work on V1 layouts do?
 
amplifyy
post Nov 15 2008, 02:29 PM
Post #29


Alternate Rock beats paper.
***

Group: Member
Posts: 71
Joined: Oct 2008
Member No: 693,799



I'm saying if Myspace permanently switched to Profile V2.
 
tokyo-rose
post Nov 16 2008, 10:40 AM
Post #30


Senior Member
********

Group: Head Staff
Posts: 18,173
Joined: Mar 2005
Member No: 108,478



QUOTE(schizo @ Nov 10 2008, 06:13 PM) *
Other than the new navigation, I really don't pay attention to all these pointless changes. I still haven't even switched to the new home skin.

Same here on both counts.
 
Luna5
post Nov 23 2008, 09:18 PM
Post #31


Senior Member
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 734
Joined: Oct 2005
Member No: 278,251



I don't think you can make your profile private either...?
 
Designsby1103
post Dec 1 2008, 09:29 AM
Post #32


Senior Member
***

Group: Member
Posts: 32
Joined: Dec 2008
Member No: 701,132



i think its cool to see but i hate to use it i do not like it for my profile at alL!
 
CrimsonSkyGraphi...
post Dec 1 2008, 06:33 PM
Post #33


All that you see or seem, is but a dream within a dream
****

Group: Member
Posts: 196
Joined: Mar 2005
Member No: 115,956



It could have some cool options in it, but it really annoys me that the 1.0 css won't work with it. x_X I just made a bunch new 1.0 layouts for me site, too.

I hope it doesn't force us to eventually ONLY use 2.0. That would be a lot of work to change all the old layouts over to the new coding. x_x
 
ChaoticHeartCras...
post Dec 1 2008, 07:36 PM
Post #34


<3
**

Group: Member
Posts: 15
Joined: Feb 2008
Member No: 624,827



You can make your profile private.

The navigation is just as easy to edit (if not easier)

Personally, I like 2.0. It's easier to edit.
 
itsmattadams
post Dec 1 2008, 11:11 PM
Post #35


Member
**

Group: Member
Posts: 29
Joined: Nov 2008
Member No: 696,434



That it no longer uses tables.

Having modules viewable to a specific category.

Not having to worry about using IE/Safari/Opera browser hacks.
 
NaShae
post Dec 2 2008, 06:25 PM
Post #36


-N[dot]Shae-
***

Group: Member
Posts: 36
Joined: Jul 2008
Member No: 668,276



QUOTE(rjohnson1991 @ Nov 10 2008, 09:43 PM) *
Kinda what I'm thinking. But I'm soo used to the old version. I like it better.

Yeah. Me, too.
Maybe, if I gave it a chance, and got used to it, some layout ideas would come, but for now I'm sticking with the 1.0
 

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: