Log In · Register

 
 
Closed TopicStart new topic
I've got a question........, about some of the rejected layouts on the new guidelines page.
theerinkal
post Oct 24 2008, 09:47 PM
Post #1


Irrisistable Cabbages.
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 549
Joined: Nov 2007
Member No: 589,355



Some of the div overlay layouts that you had on there weren't that bad looking to me.

All of the one's i liked on there would be:

V for Vendetta
I this one I see that the image quality is a tiny bit low but if I liked Vendetta then I would use it.

Narcissim
I don't understand what image in this layout is low. I don't see it on my computer. I'm using ff too.

Penguin Love
In this one I understand that the image quality is low but I would use that layout. I love penguins and this layout is cute.

Medical Mayhem
I don't see anything wrong with this layout. It says there are too many brushes and/or textures but I think it's awesome! I would most definitely use this layout if there were a code.

All I really want to know is why these are deleted.
 
Tomates
post Oct 24 2008, 09:49 PM
Post #2


poison
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 4,806
Joined: Mar 2008
Member No: 629,020



So...?
 
theerinkal
post Oct 24 2008, 09:50 PM
Post #3


Irrisistable Cabbages.
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 549
Joined: Nov 2007
Member No: 589,355



Why are they rejected?
 
Tomates
post Oct 24 2008, 09:51 PM
Post #4


poison
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 4,806
Joined: Mar 2008
Member No: 629,020



probably image qulaity, somtimes it may not look like it but i guess they do? though the first one isnt really that bad at all. So the collage doesnt look like there was much time and effort put into it, the image quality is still good
 
manny-the-dino
post Oct 24 2008, 10:06 PM
Post #5


Senior Member
*******

Group: Administrator
Posts: 8,629
Joined: Jan 2007
Member No: 498,468



V for Vendetta:
The blending is bad. Also it doesn't... become one with the background.

Narcissism:
The image quality is low. If you look closely, you can see the fuzziness on the image. Also a better font could have been chosen for "Narcissism."

Penguin Love:
It's cute but the edges on the penguins are choppy & not straight. Also, I feel that more can be added to it.

Medical Mayhem:
It's just bad, tbh. I would have used a different font, & the combination of textures & brushes don't really go together.
 
goth-nina
post Oct 24 2008, 10:18 PM
Post #6


don't call me shirley.
****

Group: Member
Posts: 193
Joined: Oct 2008
Member No: 689,028



schizo already explained why it's rejected. mellow.gif

as much as i am in LOVE with V rolleyes.gif , the blending is horrible. _dry.gif

the second one, the image button are too low.

the penguins looks idk, blurry, it looks pretty bad _dry.gif

the last one, there's too much brush & texture work.

 
theerinkal
post Oct 25 2008, 08:58 AM
Post #7


Irrisistable Cabbages.
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 549
Joined: Nov 2007
Member No: 589,355



QUOTE
V for Vendetta:
The blending is bad. Also it doesn't... become one with the background.

Narcissism:
The image quality is low. If you look closely, you can see the fuzziness on the image. Also a better font could have been chosen for "Narcissism."

Penguin Love:
It's cute but the edges on the penguins are choppy & not straight. Also, I feel that more can be added to it.

Medical Mayhem:
It's just bad, tbh. I would have used a different font, & the combination of textures & brushes don't really go together.


V. = I dissagree. The image on my screen fits perfectly with the background color. If your talking about the google and myspace search bars showing, SO WHAT. Cb staff here is so picky.

Narcissim. = I think the font for the word narcissim looks fine and if you have to look closely at it then it shouldn't effect whether it gets accepted or rejected.

Penguins. = I agree that the image quality is low and that there could've been more added to it but i would use it.

Medical Mayhem. = what does tbh mean? I'm not that good with aim lingo. I think the combination that this person had does go together. I really like it.


QUOTE
schizo already explained why it's rejected. mellow.gif

as much as i am in LOVE with V rolleyes.gif , the blending is horrible. _dry.gif

the second one, the image button are too low.

the penguins looks idk, blurry, it looks pretty bad _dry.gif

the last one, there's too much brush & texture work.

I know schizo already explained but I disagree with the reasons he gave for some of them.

I don't see where the blending is horrible in V.

For the 2nd one, Cb staff is going to let something that tiny effect whether it gets accepted or not. LAME

I understand that the penguins are blurry. I would't care about that if it looked cute and it does. I really think the Cb staff should put up polls on whether layouts get accepted or rejected. That would be fair. Everyone could pitch in instead of just 1 or a few Cb staff looking at it.

Same thing with the last one. I disagree with everyone. I would use this one in a heartbeat. No questions asked.
 
manny-the-dino
post Oct 25 2008, 04:56 PM
Post #8


Senior Member
*******

Group: Administrator
Posts: 8,629
Joined: Jan 2007
Member No: 498,468



QUOTE(theerinkal @ Oct 25 2008, 06:58 AM) *
V. = I dissagree. The image on my screen fits perfectly with the background color. If your talking about the google and myspace search bars showing, SO WHAT. Cb staff here is so picky.

Narcissim. = I think the font for the word narcissim looks fine and if you have to look closely at it then it shouldn't effect whether it gets accepted or rejected.


Medical Mayhem. = what does tbh mean? I'm not that good with aim lingo. I think the combination that this person had does go together. I really like it.

I understand that the penguins are blurry. I would't care about that if it looked cute and it does. I really think the Cb staff should put up polls on whether layouts get accepted or rejected. That would be fair. Everyone could pitch in instead of just 1 or a few Cb staff looking at it.

I didn't say it didn't fit the screen perfectly, I said it didn't really blend with the background.

Actually we do have to look at submissions closely because most of the time, something is off or low in quality.

Tbh means "to be honest."

If someone is going through the queue, yes it is up to them what gets accepted & what doesn't but that doesn't mean the decision is final. If another Design Staffer feels that something should be accepted when it was rejected or vice versa, they are more then welcome to bring it up Backstage. We will then discuss it & make a decision.
 
tokyo-rose
post Oct 25 2008, 05:07 PM
Post #9


Senior Member
********

Group: Head Staff
Posts: 18,173
Joined: Mar 2005
Member No: 108,478



QUOTE(theerinkal @ Oct 25 2008, 09:58 AM) *
Cb staff here is so picky.

I really think the Cb staff should put up polls on whether layouts get accepted or rejected. That would be fair. Everyone could pitch in instead of just 1 or a few Cb staff looking at it.

No, it's just that we actually have standards, unlike other resource sites that let people sign up and automatically have their layouts accepted no matter how good or bad they are.

Then it would take too long for layouts to be accepted or rejected. If most or all of the Design Staff agrees that a layout should be rejected, then it's going to be rejected. We can't accept every layout just because although it's not up to our standards, a few people might still use it. If you really want to, go to the designer's layout MySpace or website and use their layouts that way.

BTW, schizo (Gabi) is a girl.
 
theerinkal
post Oct 25 2008, 05:26 PM
Post #10


Irrisistable Cabbages.
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 549
Joined: Nov 2007
Member No: 589,355



QUOTE
No, it's just that we actually have standards, unlike other resource sites that let people sign up and automatically have their layouts accepted no matter how good or bad they are.

Then it would take too long for layouts to be accepted or rejected. If most or all of the Design Staff agrees that a layout should be rejected, then it's going to be rejected. We can't accept every layout just because although it's not up to our standards, a few people might still use it. If you really want to, go to the designer's layout MySpace or website and use their layouts that way.



Oh! I didn't realize that you had standards. Your right, it would take forever. haha! I'm so blonde! *no offense to any blondes out there.

Anyway, thanks!

QUOTE
BTW, schizo (Gabi) is a girl.


I always do that. GOSH! I need to get that straight. hahaha!
 
manny-the-dino
post Oct 25 2008, 05:29 PM
Post #11


Senior Member
*******

Group: Administrator
Posts: 8,629
Joined: Jan 2007
Member No: 498,468



QUOTE(theerinkal @ Oct 25 2008, 03:26 PM) *
Oh! I didn't realize that you had standards. Your right, it would take forever. haha! I'm so blonde! *no offense to any blondes out there.

Lol seriously? Then why do you think submissions have to go through the queue? _unsure.gif

Do you have any other questions or can this be closed? :)
 
Blaqheartedstar
post Oct 25 2008, 05:55 PM
Post #12


Two can keep a secret if one of them is dead.
******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 2,682
Joined: Jun 2005
Member No: 156,187



Yeah the V for vendetta was the first try... my screen was pretty dark resulted in the worst layout i have ever made evar.
the 2nd try was this
http://www.createblog.com/layouts/preview.php?id=13404
^ blending still wasn't all that great either.

Medical Mayhem. had too much going on. too much brushes rough cut out of the medial equipment... was just bad.

Narcissism. ended up being coming low quality after the upload, the original wasn't like that.


 

Closed TopicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: