Log In · Register

 
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Knol vs Wikipedia
superstitious
post Jul 25 2008, 04:07 PM
Post #1


Tick tock, Bill
*******

Group: Administrator
Posts: 8,764
Joined: Dec 2005
Member No: 333,948



http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-9997426-93.html

It seems like the biggest difference is that there will be more public ownership of the articles written/edited for a Knol than a Wikipedia
entry.

I like Wikipedia but always take things posted there with a grain of salt. I'm not sure if my faith in what's read on the internet will change all that much, even with author ownership, but I'm curious to see how well Knol does.


Google seems to have its hand in just about everything, but so far, I love everything that Google has been a part of (I doubt that I will ever stray from gmail, for example).
 
shoryuken
post Jul 26 2008, 10:48 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 5,166
Joined: Oct 2007
Member No: 585,858



lookk lykee knoll gottt WIKI beett... butt datt aintt ginnaa happinn fuu loonnggg tymee wenn ppll noo boutt knol..
 

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: