signatures |
  |
 Jun 8 2008, 02:52 PM
Post
#26
|
|
 ٩(͡๏̯͡๏)۶  Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 14,309 Joined: Nov 2004 Member No: 65,593  |
^ I been stressing that fact for a while now, when I got warned for posting a guy with a thong bikini on, just like the dude from Borat. And they said that wasn't Pg-13. smh.
 PG-13 rating is a sterner warning by the Rating Board to parents to determine whether their children under age 13 should be allow to see the pictures, as some material might not be suited for them. PG-13 may go beyond the PG rating in theme, violence, nudity, sensuality, language, adult activities or other elements, but does not reach the restricted R category. edit: spencer beat me.  basically pg-13 rating means you're allow to have images that are suitable for the ages between 13-17. |
|
|
|
|
Jun 8 2008, 02:55 PM
Post
#27
|
|
 Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,020 Joined: May 2008 Member No: 653,768 |
Anyone offended should have their parents suck their cocks. with them when viewing these boards.
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 8 2008, 03:06 PM
Post
#28
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 3,645 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 4,975 |
Dumbf**ks.
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 8 2008, 03:24 PM
Post
#29
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,095 Joined: Jul 2005 Member No: 171,080 |
QUOTE(steven @ Jun 8 2008, 02:55 PM)  Anyone offended should have their parents suck their cocks. |
|
|
|
|
Jun 8 2008, 06:35 PM
Post
#30
|
|
 AKA RockIt Studios Group: Official Member Posts: 2,286 Joined: Jun 2006 Member No: 421,809 |
oh dear lord, i started a war.
just for the record, i don't have a major problem with the signatures themselves. i'm arguing that, although they are a bit inappropriate, the main problem is the fact that i (and probably others) are limited to the use of the forum when adults are around. QUOTE(Synesthesia @ Jun 8 2008, 02:24 PM) Becka, I understand your concern, and this is being discussed Backstage right now. Have you changed your settings to hide signatures? yep. if i would have remembered that it was possible, i wouldn't have even brought it up. 
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 8 2008, 06:39 PM
Post
#31
|
|
 Tick tock, Bill Group: Administrator Posts: 8,764 Joined: Dec 2005 Member No: 333,948 |
QUOTE(RockItStudios @ Jun 7 2008, 10:33 PM) i'm really not wanting to be a troll or anything, but there are a few siggy's around here that are really...not appropriate. they don't show major nudity or anything, but IMO, they're disgusting. it really bothers me because i have to be really careful about what topics I can look at when my parents are home, and even then, they're usually in there somewhere. once again, not trying to be a troll, so i'm going to stop my opinions at that. >_< The problem is that words like "disgusting" are highly subjective. I can't reprimand people for signatures based exclusively on someone else's dislikes. I don't care for some of the signatures either (although I don't think that they're disgusting. lol I just don't care for them), but same thing. I'm not going to tell someone to get rid of a signature because it isn't aesthetically pleasing to me. Bottom line, they're not breaking the PG13 guideline. The images are suggestive, not blatant. My suggestion would be to either disable viewing signatures or ignore the individuals that have signatures you are displeased with. I apologize, but those are really the only options I see at the moment. edit - I guess as I was typing you replied. lol |
|
|
|
|
Jun 8 2008, 06:50 PM
Post
#32
|
|
|
AKA RockIt Studios Group: Official Member Posts: 2,286 Joined: Jun 2006 Member No: 421,809 |
^heh, maybe disgusting wasn't the right word. as i said, i personally don't have a problem /with/ them, although i can see how they are inappropriate. and yeah, read my previous post for the rest.
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 8 2008, 06:59 PM
Post
#33
|
|
|
Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,020 Joined: May 2008 Member No: 653,768 |
Rebecca likes my sig the most.
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 8 2008, 06:59 PM
Post
#34
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Official Member Posts: 5,166 Joined: Oct 2007 Member No: 585,858 |
QUOTE(RockItStudios @ Jun 8 2008, 07:35 PM) oh dear lord, i started a war. just for the record, i don't have a major problem with the signatures themselves. i'm arguing that, although they are a bit inappropriate, the main problem is the fact that i (and probably others) are limited to the use of the forum when adults are around. yep. if i would have remembered that it was possible, i wouldn't have even brought it up. trruu...  QUOTE(superstitious @ Jun 8 2008, 07:39 PM) The problem is that words like "disgusting" are highly subjective. I can't reprimand people for signatures based exclusively on someone else's dislikes. I don't care for some of the signatures either (although I don't think that they're disgusting. lol I just don't care for them), but same thing. I'm not going to tell someone to get rid of a signature because it isn't aesthetically pleasing to me. Bottom line, they're not breaking the PG13 guideline. The images are suggestive, not blatant. My suggestion would be to either disable viewing signatures or ignore the individuals that have signatures you are displeased with. I apologize, but those are really the only options I see at the moment. edit - I guess as I was typing you replied. lol CLOSS THRADD... 
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 8 2008, 07:27 PM
Post
#35
|
|
|
Tick tock, Bill Group: Administrator Posts: 8,764 Joined: Dec 2005 Member No: 333,948 |
QUOTE(steven @ Jun 8 2008, 06:59 PM) Rebecca likes my sig the most. hahaha. That guy so freaks me out. Your signature is oddly hypnotic though. o_O QUOTE(PrIncEoFSeXaPpeAL @ Jun 8 2008, 06:59 PM) CLOSS THRADD... Words of truth, my friend. The issue has been resolved and the topic starter has said that it's fine to go and ahead and move this on over. (wait, "move this on over"... is that southern-ish? Because I have this irrational fear that because I live in the south now, I'm developing southernisms. :X) |
|
|
|
|
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: