Worst Staff Member of the Month Options

[*kryogenix*]

I think we should do it, because there's seems to be a lot of competition these days for the title.

[*kryogenix*]

Well don't go making fake accounts to vote for other people then.

[*mona lisa*]

Just use the Moderator Performance thread instead.

[*AngelicEyz00*]

I like this! The winner gets kicked off of staff, yea?

[*kryogenix*]

Just use the Moderator Performance thread instead.

Why doesn't staff member of the month just use moderator performance then?

[Jeng]

LOL I LOL'D AT ELBAS POST!
rofl, dude we shuold do this,and then hmm they'll be kicked off, I don't have any...hate against any staff though.

[*Duchess_of_Dork*]

We could have a worst CB member of the month too.

It's all about the equality, right?

(kidding)

[*kryogenix*]

Absolutely, I'd love to see a worst member. And you still haven't responded to my PMs.

[*Intercourse.*]

^I think its a good idea. I mean it would almost just kind of open their eyes perhaps and then they can accept criticism on perhaps fixing it.

But I could see where the problem would lie and not have it happen.

[*kryogenix*]

The problem would lie in that the staff members hate criticism and they'll try to suspend and hide your posts if you do criticize them.

[*Intercourse.*]

^no its not that they will more than likely.

1. Try and ignore it
2. Be a completely immature ass around the forum about it and make little sly comments about you in places they think you won't check but secretly hope you do check just so they know you know that they read what you said about them and their not going to do anything about it.
3. Oh and of course they'll go backstage and complain about it. "How do they think they can say that about me!?" type thing. And the rest of the staff will be like " Oh just ignore them they're just trying to make you feel bad so you'll step down." and then the person will say "maybe I should step down " and they only say this to get everyone else to say OH NO don't step down! Your great on staff! and of course they go about and say that and they completely buy it and their like THANKS GUYS! and then they stay and they never change.

the end.


So if this were to take place there would be no point except to get the staff to dislike people even more around the forum.

[*AngelicEyz00*]

^no its not that they will more than likely.

1. Try and ignore it
2. Be a completely immature ass around the forum about it and make little sly comments about you in places they think you won't check but secretly hope you do check just so they know you know that they read what you said about them and their not going to do anything about it.
3. Oh and of course they'll go backstage and complain about it. "How do they think they can say that about me!?" type thing. And the rest of the staff will be like " Oh just ignore them they're just trying to make you feel bad so you'll step down." and then the person will say "maybe I should step down " and they only say this to get everyone else to say OH NO don't step down! Your great on staff! and of course they go about and say that and they completely buy it and their like THANKS GUYS! and then they stay and they never change.

the end.
So if this were to take place there would be no point except to get the staff to dislike people even more around the forum.

This is so true.

[*The Markster*]

It'd really be fun to see this.
I just think it's a little .. insulting.

[*IVIike*]

Holly i lol-ed at your post. I don't have any complaints as of now probably becuase i have been flying under the radar lately

[loveylovely]

I laughed at this. Elba's first post was really amusing.

I say let's do it.

[1angel3]

This be fun what are you waiting for lets do it.

[*karmakiller*]

What about ties? Then who gets kicked off staff



...losers!

[*Intercourse.*]

We would have a tie breaker!

[*kryogenix*]

Check it.

Even if it means removing SMOTM, we don't need to have a WSMOTM. I don't think the community (mods and members included) as a whole, is mature enough to handle it. It would be sad to see SMOTM and MOTM go. But maybe this will all just be better handled in "Moderator Performance".

Right, so the mods and the community at large sucks. Gotcha.

[*The Markster*]

Check it.

Even if it means removing SMOTM, we don't need to have a WSMOTM. I don't think the community (mods and members included) as a whole, is mature enough to handle it. It would be sad to see SMOTM and MOTM go. But maybe this will all just be better handled in "Moderator Performance".

Aw, come on, brownsugar. Let's have one!

[*digitalfragrance*]

If businesses don't have a "worst employee of the month," why should we? Is this productive? When people aren't satisfied with a particular employee, they write a complaint. Is it any different than the Moderator Performance thread?

I really don't see a point. There is a great opportunity for criticism in the Moderator Performance thread.

[*kryogenix*]

If businesses don't have a "worst employee of the month," why should we? Is this productive? When people aren't satisfied with a particular employee, they write a complaint. Is it any different than the Moderator Performance thread?

I really don't see a point. There is a great opportunity for criticism in the Moderator Performance thread.

HAHAHAHAHAHA!

Oh wow.

Because createblog = SERIOUS BUSINESS.

[Rachel]

Welllll duh!

[HakunaMatata]

I'm for the idea, as long as, and I am completely serious about this, every vote comes with a DECENT critique that is substantiated with evidence. Heck, I wish SMOTM would be like that, too.

But really, you guys, you can't use the Mod Performance thread for this kind of thing because....?

[*[2]Nekked*]

I like this! The winner gets kicked off of staff, yea?

OMGYESPLZ TO THIS.