Is Beauty Really In the Eye of The Beholder?, What do you think? |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
![]() ![]() |
Is Beauty Really In the Eye of The Beholder?, What do you think? |
![]()
Post
#51
|
|
![]() in the reverb chamber. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,022 Joined: Nov 2005 Member No: 300,308 ![]() |
The fact that it's that obvious and yet still subject to relativism is exactly why it needs to be brought up. Dude, you're talking about identifying and affirming the definition of a word. It doesn't add any information to the debate. Also, metaphysics is meaningless. I never was one for compliments. May your corned beef not pickle correctly. I don't like beef. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#52
|
|
![]() Vae Victis ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 1,416 Joined: Sep 2006 Member No: 460,227 ![]() |
Dude, you're talking about identifying and affirming the definition of a word. It doesn't add any information to the debate. The application, not the definition. There wasn't any dispute on the latter. Metaphysics is the entire foundation of philosophy. Aristotle even defined metaphysics as the "science" of certain causes and principles. It simply asks, "What is?" That's as concrete or as transcendent as the individual theory operating under it. The modernistic context of it is a relativistic perversion of a much more encompassing word. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |