Regular Members = Official members? |
  |
| *Steven* |
 Dec 22 2007, 01:15 PM
Post
#26
|
|
Guest  |
WERE YOU ON STAFF MICHELLE?!
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 22 2007, 01:54 PM
Post
#27
|
|
 DDR \\ I'm Dee :)  Group: Mentor Posts: 8,662 Joined: Mar 2006 Member No: 384,020 |
Yeah, I agree this is a good idea. When I first started CB and was learning about things, I thought it was for all members. I've never been an OM, hah.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 23 2007, 02:15 AM
Post
#28
|
|
 Cornflakes :D Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,541 Joined: Dec 2005 Member No: 322,923 |
Well I'm sorry Michelle >_< I never knew you brought it up.. its just been brought up a bit and I would just make it finalized.. we'll start it next month
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 23 2007, 09:29 AM
Post
#29
|
|
 Tick tock, Bill Group: Administrator Posts: 8,764 Joined: Dec 2005 Member No: 333,948 |
Actually, I think this was brought up before Michelle was on staff. I just can't remember who brought it up, but if memory serves, someone was mentioning it not too long after MoTM was created.
Point is, it's a good idea, and if more than one person has thought about it and brought it up, then cool. QUOTE(Michelle @ Dec 22 2007, 10:02 AM)  But, yes, I think it's a good idea. But I also think it should be less permanent than those who have reached a certain number of posts. If their activity dies significantly, then the status should be removed. Very true. It's just finding the balance of what activity should be maintained. See, I see PPD as a rather shitty way of maintaining OM status. Sure, it's not difficult when you're first getting there, but once you have posts in the thousands, if you take any break at all it's a sick process to get your PPD up. At least in my opinion it is. |
|
|
|
|
Dec 31 2007, 02:20 PM
Post
#30
|
|
|
Tick tock, Bill Group: Administrator Posts: 8,764 Joined: Dec 2005 Member No: 333,948 |
I'm sorry to bump this, but a new month approaches and I was wondering if a decision has been made.
The poll results are undeniably favorable in having regular members included. |
|
|
|
|
Jan 10 2008, 12:04 AM
Post
#31
|
|
 in the reverb chamber. Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,022 Joined: Nov 2005 Member No: 300,308 |
Yeah? Any word? I'm sort of interested in having my OM status back - I've been a long time supporter and contributor here and it's kind of disheartening to see that spammers and drive-by posters are reworded more than dedicated and thoughtful contributors.
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 10 2008, 12:08 AM
Post
#32
|
|
|
Cornflakes :D Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,541 Joined: Dec 2005 Member No: 322,923 |
Well then Nate, if you win Member of the month you'll be an official member forever and ever!
Hold on, are you Nate? o_O or are you Jake GAHHH that avatar and signature. |
|
|
|
|
Jan 10 2008, 12:13 AM
Post
#33
|
|
|
in the reverb chamber. Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,022 Joined: Nov 2005 Member No: 300,308 |
QUOTE(Insurmountable @ Jan 9 2008, 11:08 PM) Well then Nate, if you win Member of the month you'll be an official member forever and ever! I'm Nate (ironic that you mistook me for Jake) and I already won Member of the Month back in June of 2006. So? 
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 10 2008, 12:15 AM
Post
#34
|
|
|
Cornflakes :D Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,541 Joined: Dec 2005 Member No: 322,923 |
Oh well hmm I don't have a problem with previous winners being OM's. So I'll grant you the wish :D
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 10 2008, 12:18 AM
Post
#35
|
|
|
in the reverb chamber. Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,022 Joined: Nov 2005 Member No: 300,308 |
QUOTE(Insurmountable @ Jan 9 2008, 11:15 PM) Oh well hmm I don't have a problem with previous winners being OM's. So I'll grant you the wish :D Thanks, Holly. I appreciate it. Finally, I've been off any sort of privileged position for so long. Not that I need it or anything; it's just that I've been here for so long anyways. |
|
|
|
|
Jan 10 2008, 12:22 AM
Post
#36
|
|
|
Cornflakes :D Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,541 Joined: Dec 2005 Member No: 322,923 |
Oh I can see why Nate, well congrats your an OM now! :D
woot |
|
|
|
|
Jan 10 2008, 04:13 AM
Post
#37
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Official Member Posts: 4,750 Joined: Apr 2004 Member No: 10,581 |
QUOTE(doublehelix @ Dec 18 2007, 02:25 PM) I like that a lot of the members, who are not OM's are being nominated for MoTM, however, those are going to be the newer members, and sometimes, they will be putting out posts like crazy, and all of a sudden, can just stop all together, which sucks. Them having to be OM's kind of gives the community more of a chance to get to know them. Unless you change the criteria of MoTM.. I really can't see how regular members can be official members that easily. I think it's a really great idea but doublehelix's response really tickled my fancy and I strongly agree with the response. |
|
|
|
|
Jan 10 2008, 11:39 AM
Post
#38
|
|
|
Cornflakes :D Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,541 Joined: Dec 2005 Member No: 322,923 |
I've never really seen someone that was really new win MotM, they've had chances but weren't actually the winners, they usually won the following month if they were still active. The current winner was nominated last month and she was really new then, but she didn't win. She won the following month after she was still continually active.
|
|
|
|
| *Steven* |
Jan 10 2008, 11:40 AM
Post
#39
|
|
Guest |
I won 20 days after I registered.
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 28 2008, 09:25 PM
Post
#40
|
|
 I'm Jc Group: Mentor Posts: 13,619 Joined: Jul 2006 Member No: 437,556 |
QUOTE(Steven @ Jan 10 2008, 12:40 PM) I won 20 days after I registered. you's a cb legend, son |
|
|
|
|
Feb 1 2008, 11:02 PM
Post
#41
|
|
 This bag is not a toy. Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 3,090 Joined: Oct 2007 Member No: 583,108 |
I don't see why not! I definitely think that if a regular member has proven that they've outshined the rest over that month, they absolutely should win.
And if they do, people would pretty much be like "Why isn't he/she an Official Member anyway?" About the comment relating to newer members - the staff does make the final vote on Member of the Month, and if they win, it will certainly be because they deserve it, whether they remain active or not. Suzzette won SMOTM before, and even though what happened happened, she still deserved it when she won it. |
|
|
|
|
Feb 2 2008, 01:37 PM
Post
#42
|
|
 <joke> inside </joke> Group: Official Member Posts: 2,283 Joined: Oct 2006 Member No: 470,590 |
has this happened, yet?
QUOTE yeah but this becomes unrealistic in a lot of cases, esp people who have had their account a while and not been active. when they come back, regaining ppd or 3500 posts is hard. yess, it very hard *sighs* |
|
|
|
|
Feb 2 2008, 03:28 PM
Post
#43
|
|
|
Cornflakes :D Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,541 Joined: Dec 2005 Member No: 322,923 |
yea all the past winners of MotM are official members now.
and if there are some that are not OM then I'm checking back on all the winners and changing them. |
|
|
|
|
Mar 25 2008, 04:55 PM
Post
#44
|
|
 yo yo yiggidy yo. Group: Official Member Posts: 1,606 Joined: Mar 2005 Member No: 108,591 |
this was a great idea. :]
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 1 2008, 06:08 PM
Post
#45
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Official Member Posts: 6,349 Joined: Aug 2006 Member No: 455,274 |
crap... I'm never gonna be a OM.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 1 2008, 06:08 PM
Post
#46
|
|
|
Tick tock, Bill Group: Administrator Posts: 8,764 Joined: Dec 2005 Member No: 333,948 |
Non official members can be MoTM.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 1 2008, 06:11 PM
Post
#47
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Official Member Posts: 6,349 Joined: Aug 2006 Member No: 455,274 |
QUOTE(superstitious @ Apr 1 2008, 07:08 PM) Non official members can be MoTM. Right... which sucks, cuz I don't meet yalls standard 
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 7 2008, 11:48 PM
Post
#48
|
|
 Melieized Group: Official Designer Posts: 1,372 Joined: Nov 2006 Member No: 478,715 |
^i agree
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 7 2008, 11:53 PM
Post
#49
|
|
 ٩(͡๏̯͡๏)۶ Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 14,309 Joined: Nov 2004 Member No: 65,593 |
QUOTE(doublehelix @ Apr 7 2008, 08:45 PM) I just don't think their given enough for such a prestigious award. I don't think MOTM is a prestigious award. It's just a popularity contest given to someone every month. And if Sally can get her 8,000 posts back and get OM status, I don't see why Loquat can't. |
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: