Alternates |
![]() ![]() |
Alternates |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() i did your boyfriend ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Designer Posts: 3,335 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 4,071 ![]() |
maybe come time the next hiring session, you should consider assigning Alternates.
in case people step down, you can just default to the alternates. catch my drift? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Cornflakes :D ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,541 Joined: Dec 2005 Member No: 322,923 ![]() |
Hmm, that would be neat. Like we have specific number of who we want to hire and then have the second best for each person. I don't think its a bad idea
![]() |
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
![]() i did your boyfriend ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Designer Posts: 3,335 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 4,071 ![]() |
yeeessss
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 2,223 Joined: Dec 2006 Member No: 485,356 ![]() |
Replacements ...
After selecting the new moderators, we also select the qlternates. Will they be informed? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Rhinestone Cowboy ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Designer Posts: 159 Joined: Feb 2005 Member No: 99,249 ![]() |
Good idea, kind of like a understudy type job. This would also keep hiring process to a minimum and also say one of the staff wanted to go on vacation, there alternates could fill in for them, and send any forum reports to an official staff via PM.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 2,223 Joined: Dec 2006 Member No: 485,356 ![]() |
^ When the moderators get back from getting tanned, the alternates get demodded.
Should they get a special title or should they remain OMs? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#7
|
|
![]() Cornflakes :D ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,541 Joined: Dec 2005 Member No: 322,923 ![]() |
Well I was taking a shower and thinking, what if when the new mods are appointed theres a topic backstage thats made and they choose who they think is best fit for their replacement and they give valid reason and everyone discusses it and if they think that person if fit then thats their replacement if they ever step down?
The only thing that I can see being a problem with this idea is that by the time the first person steps down, the replacement could be no where to be found or just plan out not interested anymore (they would be contacted being asked if they would like to be so and so replacement). Or if the person doesn't seem fit for the shoes to fill anymore. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#8
|
|
![]() Lurker. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Designer Posts: 2,161 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 3,851 ![]() |
I think it'd be better if you appoint people rather than hold hiring sessions. I think someone mentioned this idea before.
Also, the alternative thing is a good idea. If they don't show anymore interest, then you can't do anything about it. You can leave the spot vacant or find someone who is capable/willing. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#9
|
|
![]() Hey, I'm Mike ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 1,272 Joined: May 2006 Member No: 406,241 ![]() |
Well I was taking a shower and thinking, what if when the new mods are appointed theres a topic backstage thats made and they choose who they think is best fit for their replacement and they give valid reason and everyone discusses it and if they think that person if fit then thats their replacement if they ever step down? The only thing that I can see being a problem with this idea is that by the time the first person steps down, the replacement could be no where to be found or just plan out not interested anymore (they would be contacted being asked if they would like to be so and so replacement). Or if the person doesn't seem fit for the shoes to fill anymore. I agree thats a better idea, because if someone is an "alternate" they won't really feel that great about themselves, but if they get promoted that will just make it more of a positive situation |
|
|
![]()
Post
#10
|
|
![]() i did your boyfriend ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Designer Posts: 3,335 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 4,071 ![]() |
another approach is we could just have former staff members (that still have good standing with the staff) volunteer to be backup mods until an actual replacement is found.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#11
|
|
![]() Cornflakes :D ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,541 Joined: Dec 2005 Member No: 322,923 ![]() |
^That's not bad I guess, we would have to make a list of former mods that would be fine taking others places in time of need.
I mean it seems like a good idea, but theres a lot of gray areas that need to be figured out. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#12
|
|
![]() i did your boyfriend ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Designer Posts: 3,335 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 4,071 ![]() |
i guess they would just be temp mods until the next hiring process (if you are still going to do the hiring the same way you have been). if they wanted to stay on staff, they would have to apply with everyone else. i guess they would have a leg up on everyone though because the rest of the staff has seen them in action, so to speak.
yeah there are a lot of grey areas, but i dont think we need to make this more complicated than it should be. i think we keep asking questions and asking questions, and then nothing is ever done. in the past there has been a lot of success in just playing by ear, and then perfecting the concept as we go along. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#13
|
|
![]() Cornflakes :D ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,541 Joined: Dec 2005 Member No: 322,923 ![]() |
Yea, I would like keeping it simple.
I think more or less trust is going to be the bigger deal. Considering all the things that have happened recently its a matter if were all with open arms to let this idea in. If you know what I mean. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#14
|
|
![]() i did your boyfriend ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Designer Posts: 3,335 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 4,071 ![]() |
at first, maybe the temps would have limited abilities. maybe they cant warn people themselves, but rather post something backstage suggesting someone else to warn them.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#15
|
|
![]() Cornflakes :D ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,541 Joined: Dec 2005 Member No: 322,923 ![]() |
Alright that sounds good
![]() |
|
|
![]()
Post
#16
|
|
![]() i did your boyfriend ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Designer Posts: 3,335 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 4,071 ![]() |
but there should also be a level of authority. maybe they DO have the ability to verbally warn someone, just not officially warn them/suspend them/whatever.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#17
|
|
![]() i lost weight with Mulder! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Designer Posts: 4,070 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 79,019 ![]() |
I really like this idea. Most new mods have to go through an adjustment period, and this way, hopefully by the time they were "full" mods they would be fully ..indoctrinated.
plus, some people who are great candidates for mods but perhaps are lacking other requirements can fill these positions? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#18
|
|
![]() Cornflakes :D ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,541 Joined: Dec 2005 Member No: 322,923 ![]() |
^Well, for example...what would they be lacking? o_O
But other than that I agree with you Michelle ![]() |
|
|
![]()
Post
#19
|
|
![]() i lost weight with Mulder! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Designer Posts: 4,070 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 79,019 ![]() |
haha, i don't know.
Maybe someone is amazing coding wise and is pretty helpful in the support center but hasn't submitted anything to cB? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#20
|
|
![]() i did your boyfriend ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Designer Posts: 3,335 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 4,071 ![]() |
post counts, the "right attitude" etc.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#21
|
|
![]() Cornflakes :D ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,541 Joined: Dec 2005 Member No: 322,923 ![]() |
or someone that has submitted a ton of stuff and only helps very little in the forums but is exceptionally qualified besides that?
Thats how Ricky was when he was first hired and well second time too.. lol the "right attitude" ? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#22
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 2,223 Joined: Dec 2006 Member No: 485,356 ![]() |
While waiting for an opening, what would their status read? Alternates? Members? OM?
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#23
|
|
![]() i lost weight with Mulder! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Designer Posts: 4,070 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 79,019 ![]() |
yeah, attitude too I guess.
but yes, being an alternate would give the higher ups a great opportunity to see if people would fix whatever area they were lacking in after they were semi-hired. Like for instance, I didn't. Twice. haha. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#24
|
|
![]() i did your boyfriend ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Designer Posts: 3,335 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 4,071 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#25
|
|
![]() Cornflakes :D ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,541 Joined: Dec 2005 Member No: 322,923 ![]() |
hah thats so cute.
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |