Know what amuses me?, People who can't argue... Options

[bat19]

Yeah, argumentum ad hominem is lame.

^Well Calculatus Eliminatus to you.

Though I proceeded to call Steven a "douchebag" several times in another thread, I think I made my point across just fine with the added flair of insults. So unless you disagree, I'd say those types of situations would be the exceptions that prove the rule.

Oh also, it's great when the people doing the insulting don't let others know what they look like. When that happens, I either think they're
A: Ugly so they don't want to post a pic
B: Insecure
C: Lazy

Most often, I bet it's choice A or B.

This coming from the guy whose profile has a picture of a hand in front of his face.

[EddieV]

No, I won't. I'd only get upset when the person kept on missunderstanding my point. But I'd never resort to eyes rolling or weird noise making or any childish behavior of that sort. In debates, we agree to disagree not force our opinions down others' throats.

That's quite understandable, it does suck though when you know you're idea is the best, and people don't go by it and things go wrong, but that's a whole new story.

[NoSex]

Though I proceeded to call Steven a "douchebag" several times in another thread, I think I made my point across just fine with the added flair of insults. So unless you disagree, I'd say those types of situations would be the exceptions that prove the rule.

There is a difference between arguing from an insult and merely insulting someone. I think we can all tell the difference, jackass. It is no exception to the rule, because it has nothing to do with the rule.

[bat19]

^ Dude, there is no f**kin way you're gonna sit there and try lecturing me on insulting people. Almost all your posts in the troops thread are calling that one kid an idiot and stupid and a moron for being completely right. You're a douche, you're a f**kin retarded little pissant who's gonna die a hermit virgin and no one will go to your funeral because no one likes you. The Blair Witch Project sucked ass, ask anyone with an opinion that actually matters, e.g. anyone who isn't you.

[NoSex]

^ Dude, there is no f**kin way you're gonna sit there and try lecturing me on insulting people. Almost all your posts in the troops thread are calling that one kid an idiot and stupid and a moron for being completely right. You're a douche, you're a f**kin retarded little pissant who's gonna die a hermit virgin and no one will go to your funeral because no one likes you. The Blair Witch Project sucked ass, ask anyone with an opinion that actually matters, e.g. anyone who isn't you.

Oh, woe is me!
You've convinced me of my evil ways!
I must convert, convert!

[*Uronacid*]

I peed in your soup Steven.

Oh, woe is me!
You've convinced me of my evil ways!
I must convert, convert!

*preforms surgical exorcism*
Look a vagina. Cool, I never saw one of those before! :D

You're comparing Hitler to Saddam Hussein.
You're comparing the German Army to... what exactly?
You f**king idiot.

You f**king idiot.

fucking idiot.

What about this one?

P.S. All your arguments suck. What "Supporting the Troops" is is really relative to the desires and wishes of the troops. If the troops want to stay, supporting them would be letting them stay. If they want to leave, supporting them would be helping them leave. It's not that hard to figure, you f**k heads.

P.S. All your arguments suck, you f**k heads.

you fuck heads.

Yeah, you never use argumentum ad hominem. You're a fuckin Angel. That's what you are, an Angel. xD

^Well Calculatus Eliminatus to you.

Though I proceeded to call Steven a "douchebag" several times in another thread, I think I made my point across just fine with the added flair of insults. So unless you disagree, I'd say those types of situations would be the exceptions that prove the rule.
This coming from the guy whose profile has a picture of a hand in front of his face.

Dude, you weren't even calling him a douche bag for the argument's sake. You were doing it because he warned you, and it was lame. You weren't even debating when you did it.

[bat19]

Dude, you weren't even calling him a douche bag for the argument's sake. You were doing it because he warned you, and it was lame. You weren't even debating when you did it.

No, I was referring to a PM argument me and steven had, where I continuosly called him a douchebag, but still made my point clear.

[NoSex]

Yeah, you never use argumentum ad hominem. You're a fuckin Angel. That's what you are, an Angel. xD

There is a difference between arguing from an insult and merely insulting someone. I think we can all tell the difference, jackass. It is no exception to the rule, because it has nothing to do with the rule.

Yeah, you're good at stuff.