Supporting the Troops End the War Options

[NoSex]

Any third world country who attacks America.
Im glad to see that America actually took a stand against a dictator who probably would have gone even further if we didnt do anything in the beginning.
That is what happened with Hitler after he began attacking surronding European countries....no one did anything, and he killed thousands of people and began a war. Nobody tried to take a stand in his earlier actions and the world payed a heavy price.

You're comparing Hitler to Saddam Hussein.
You're comparing the German Army to... what exactly?
You f**king idiot.

[*Uronacid*]

You're comparing Hitler to Saddam Hussein.
You're comparing the German Army to... what exactly?
You f**king idiot.

So, what you're saying is that his opinion doesn't matter because he's an idiot? Point well taken.

[Shahin]

You're comparing Hitler to Saddam Hussein.
You're comparing the German Army to... what exactly?
You f**king idiot.

You're a douchebag of epic proportions. While comparing Hussein to Hitler is a bit of a stretch, in smaller terms the comparison isn't idiotic. Saddam Hussein gassed his own people, because he didn't like them.

Don't call people "f**king idiots" when you have no point to make yourself.

[*Steven*]

Stop throwing around insults and bashing.

[bat19]

^Douche

You're comparing Hitler to Saddam Hussein.
You're comparing the German Army to... what exactly?
You f**king idiot.

^Douchebag

[*Steven*]

The-Abominable-CPillar, this is your verbal warning for member bashing. You will receive a PM.

[NoSex]

Don't call people "f**king idiots" when you have no point to make yourself.

My point is Saddam Hussein was never a threat to national security or an ingredient of world war. He simply was not threatening enough to mandate a war. My point is that it is a false analogy, while the world wars may have been justified, I don't believe that the conflict in Iraq is. So, why should we be there? And, if the war isn't about our defense and safety, why should we support it and why shouldn't we want our troops home and actually safe?

[lilsnoopy]

Any third world country who attacks America.
Im glad to see that America actually took a stand against a dictator who probably would have gone even further if we didnt do anything in the beginning.
That is what happened with Hitler after he began attacking surronding European countries....no one did anything, and he killed thousands of people and began a war. Nobody tried to take a stand in his earlier actions and the world payed a heavy price.

You're comparing Hitler to Saddam Hussein.
You're comparing the German Army to... what exactly?
You f**king idiot.

First off Im not an idiot. Really, Im not. If anyone is an idiot, its someone who cant even try to understand what Im saying, and then feels the need to bash me on the internet. Its not very nice. Be more understanding to other people's beleifs (sp?), you'll need that skill in the real world.
Anyways, moving on. I wasnt comparing those two people. I was referring to how people reacted to two differnet scernios.
Hitler's form of foriegn policy was taking over European countires, starting with poland. The Allies allowed him to do this, since if they didnt, they might start another war (which they didnt want to do).
Yet, since the Allies didnt stop Hitler in the begining, after he took over Poland, they allowed WW2 to start, which resulted in thousands of people dying.
After the two towers were destroyed, America actually fought back. Imagine if America didnt fight back? If we didnt, America might have gotten attacked again, in a more devasting way. Terrorist's dont follow modern way of fighting, so anything that resembles the word "crazy" is possible for them.
All Im saying is that America got rid of a tyrant who attempt'd to install fear in countries by terrorist methods by hitting the US first. If we didnt get rid of him, who would? We got rid of a potential threat, unlike the Allies in WW2

[bat19]

The-Abominable-CPillar, this is your verbal warning for member bashing. You will receive a PM.

^Double-Douche

[NoSex]

After the two towers were destroyed, America actually fought back. Imagine if America didnt fight back? If we didnt, America might have gotten attacked again, in a more devasting way. Terrorist's dont follow modern way of fighting, so anything that resembles the word "crazy" is possible for them.
All Im saying is that America got rid of a tyrant who attempt'd to install fear in countries by terrorist methods by hitting the US first.

What would prevent terrorists from attacking us again?
It's like trying to eliminate school shootings. You can't do it.
Correlation doesn't mean causation. Just because we weren't attacked again doesn't mean that our offensive position is actually preventing terrorist attacks. Remember, this isn't the first time the US has been attacked by terrorists (Hell, it isn't even the first time the WTC was attacked) , and it won't be the last (Well, for those towers it will be). Anyone can instill fear, not everyone can actually launch a serious invasion. Figure it out.

Oh, and don't forget: there is no connection between Saddam Hussein and the September 11th terrorist attacks. Moron.

[*Steven*]

^Double-Douche

This is your warning. You'll receive a PM momentarily.

[bat19]

This is your warning. You'll receive a PM momentarily.

^triple-douche

Josh (Uronacid) and I are in agreement that you're acting like a little pansy bitch on a powertrip and are completely retarded for thinking that I care if you raise my warning level. I was at 40% when you raised it, you think that might have been a sign. Dumbass

[*Michelle*]

^triple-douche

Josh (Uronacid) and I are in agreement that you're acting like a little pansy bitch on a powertrip and are completely retarded for thinking that I care if you raise my warning level. I was at 40% when you raised it, you think that might have been a sign. Dumbass

Really? Because just a few days ago, Josh PM'd me saying something along the lines of "YOU AND YOUR BOYFRIEND RULE". I don't really remember b/c I deleted it. It seems like we've got way too many hypocritical two-faced bitches on cB, then.

[*Steven*]

Josh (Uronacid) and I are in agreement that you're acting like a little pansy bitch on a powertrip and are completely retarded for thinking that I care if you raise my warning level. I was at 40% when you raised it, you think that might have been a sign. Dumbass

That's fine and dandy, but if you have something to say about me let's go to mod performance and we can argue the issue there.

[bat19]

Crazy Michelle, in rebuttal to your statement, Josh did in fact say that he thought Steven was cool because of the three of us completely destroying Nate in that argument we had a few posts back. But then as all people young and drunk with power, he turned into a DOUCHE.

And Steven, I dont give a shit if its PM or posts, its a nonsensical argument that "Douche" is really worth having such a long stick up your ass. Did you lube it well before jamming it up there or did you go the painful way? Whatever you do, stay away from Bran. It has lots of Fiber and let me tell you, it will hurt soooo bad.

[*Michelle*]

Crazy Michelle, in rebuttal to your statement, Josh did in fact say that he thought Steven was cool because of the three of us completely destroying Nate in that argument we had a few posts back. But then as all people young and drunk with power, he turned into a DOUCHE.

O RLY? I was under the impression that it had nothing to do with Nate (whoever he is) b/c I have no idea what the f**k you're talking about. If Josh wants to prance around and suck dick to people he thinks are "cool" that's fine with me, but please tell him to be somewhat consistent in the people who he has "new respect for" b/c it makes him look like a somewhat more successful troll than he(or you) is.

[bat19]

O RLY? I was under the impression that it had nothing to do with Nate (whoever he is) b/c I have no idea what the f**k you're talking about. If Josh wants to prance around and suck dick to people he thinks are "cool" that's fine with me, but please tell him to be somewhat consistent in the people who he has "new respect for" b/c it makes him look like a somewhat more successful troll than he(or you) is.

first off, you better watch your tone honey-tits. Thats my friend you're talking about with that mouth. If he wants to suck some dick, thats his perogative, you go back to your buisness of doing the same.

Secondly, I have no idea what you meant with that last sentence. Are you suggesting we're ugly or something? It made no sense. Learn sentence structure.

[*Michelle*]

first off, you better watch your tone honey-tits. Thats my friend you're talking about with that mouth. If he wants to suck some dick, thats his perogative, you go back to your buisness of doing the same.

Secondly, I have no idea what you meant with that last sentence. Are you suggesting we're ugly or something? It made no sense. Learn sentence structure.

I realize he is your friend, and I could care less whose dicks he wants to suck. I am merely suggesting that he should be more consistent in who he wants to suck, because it makes him look less intelligent when he bounces his head around from different types of dicks.

My sentence seems perfectly clear to me, so learn communication.

[bat19]

Actually honey-tits, I had to learn nerd speak. What got me was that you were calling us trolls. I dont know what the f**k a troll is, well I didnt. I do now, had to call up Josh and find out. He says that if you really want to suck his dick that bad, you'll have to take a number. There's a long line of people and I dont think there are any cuts.

[lilsnoopy]

What would prevent terrorists from attacking us again?
It's like trying to eliminate school shootings. You can't do it.
Correlation doesn't mean causation. Just because we weren't attacked again doesn't mean that our offensive position is actually preventing terrorist attacks. Remember, this isn't the first time the US has been attacked by terrorists (Hell, it isn't even the first time the WTC was attacked) , and it won't be the last (Well, for those towers it will be). Anyone can instill fear, not everyone can actually launch a serious invasion. Figure it out.

Oh, and don't forget: there is no connection between Saddam Hussein and the September 11th terrorist attacks. Moron.

Again, Im not COMPARING those two figures
-_-"
Im COMPARING how people reacted to the issue
I stated that already.
obviously you can read, but you lack the ability to put two and two together when you dont agree with something. Its like you shut off what the person is saying just because you dont like the first part of the sentence.

[NoSex]

Im COMPARING how people reacted to the issue

Your point being?

[bat19]

^hahaha. Nosex, very accurate. The name I mean, not whatever you posted, cause based on your opinions in the past, how they're always dead wrong and simply retarded, you're wrong in this matter as well.

[NoSex]

^hahaha. Nosex, very accurate. The name I mean, not whatever you posted, cause based on your opinions in the past, how they're always dead wrong and simply retarded, you're wrong in this matter as well.

I'm so offended.

[lilsnoopy]

Your point being?

That is the point
-_-"

Its not very hard to understand, my 13 year old cousin understood it, so you should be able to!

[NoSex]

That is the point
-_-"

Its not very hard to understand, my 13 year old cousin understood it, so you should be able to!

Im glad to see that America actually took a stand against a dictator who probably would have gone even further if we didnt do anything in the beginning.
That is what happened with Hitler after he began attacking surronding European countries....no one did anything, and he killed thousands of people and began a war. Nobody tried to take a stand in his earlier actions and the world payed a heavy price.

So, your point is that if we didn't invade Iraq, Saddam Hussein was going to pull a Hitler and start attacking neighboring countries and throw us into world war?

I thought my replies already covered this foolishness.
If they didn't, then what is your point?