Log In · Register

 
47 Pages V  « < 35 36 37 38 39 > »   
 Closed TopicStart new topic
Moderator Performance, V.2, Suggestions/Complaints/Compliments
*superstitious*
post Jun 22 2007, 06:34 AM
Post #901





Guest
Toya is amazing. She cleared up much of the queue yesterday and is very much deserving of recognition. thumbsup.gif
 
*SayBloodyMary*
post Jun 22 2007, 06:50 AM
Post #902





Guest
^ Seriously, she did an amazing jopb with the queue!
 
gelionie
post Jun 22 2007, 11:18 AM
Post #903


say maydayism.
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,447
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 26,344
Thanks Toya!! _smile.gif
 
Demico
post Jun 23 2007, 06:00 PM
Post #904


Newbie
*

Group: Member
Posts: 1
Joined: Jun 2007
Member No: 537,939
Post Edited. - Toya (freeflow)
 
michellerrific
post Jun 24 2007, 02:12 PM
Post #905


vivacity
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 3,183
Joined: Jan 2007
Member No: 495,247
QUOTE(gelionie @ Jun 20 2007, 09:07 PM) *
However, they are doing a good job on accepting/rejecting layouts. _smile.gif
I do have to agree I like what I see now, some more of the simpler, minimal designs. Even some of my previously accepted-then-rejected layouts came back.
 
*kryogenix*
post Jun 26 2007, 08:29 PM
Post #906





Guest
The mod team is horrible and there is no accountability.
 
sadolakced acid
post Jun 26 2007, 09:13 PM
Post #907


dripping destruction
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,282
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 21,929
what's new?

like i said before, if you make being a moderator a sort of exclusive club, you're going to attract the wrong sorts of people.

In my opinion, all official members should be able to become moderators. maybe 1000 posts, 10 ppd, whatever. yea, have requirements. Demod anyone who goes apeshit with the power, and then you wouldn't have these problems.

of course, then you'd have the problems of admin becoming an exclusive club...

so of course, maybe there could be some sort of checks and balances. That would be interesting.
 
*kryogenix*
post Jun 26 2007, 09:33 PM
Post #908





Guest
QUOTE(sadolakced acid @ Jun 26 2007, 10:13 PM) *
so of course, maybe there could be some sort of checks and balances. That would be interesting.


DING DING DING DING DING DING

YOU SIR ARE A WINNER ON THE PRICE IS RIGHT COME ON DOWN JOHNNY TELL HIM WHAT HE'S WON A NEW CARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!

Hence the reason for this thread. Except for some reason, no one could grasp this concept.

This post has been edited by superstitious: Jun 27 2007, 07:13 AM
Reason for edit: Edited font size to not stretch the forum. Sorry :(
 
*SayBloodyMary*
post Jun 27 2007, 07:11 AM
Post #909





Guest
^ Once again, James, not agreeing with you does not equate to not grasping a concept.
 
*kryogenix*
post Jun 27 2007, 01:05 PM
Post #910





Guest
QUOTE(SayBloodyMary @ Jun 27 2007, 08:11 AM) *
^ Once again, James, not agreeing with you does not equate to not grasping a concept.


So I guess at that point, it's just stupidity then.
 
*ersatz*
post Jun 27 2007, 01:52 PM
Post #911





Guest
Hey James, why wasn't any of this an issue when you were on staff with the same people that are on staff now?
 
*kryogenix*
post Jun 27 2007, 09:27 PM
Post #912





Guest
QUOTE(ersatz @ Jun 27 2007, 02:52 PM) *
Hey James, why wasn't any of this an issue when you were on staff with the same people that are on staff now?


O RLY? I seem to recall otherwise...
 
*kryogenix*
post Jun 27 2007, 09:49 PM
Post #913





Guest
Or maybe you're banking on the fact that I have no way to prove it.
 
*kryogenix*
post Jun 27 2007, 10:00 PM
Post #914





Guest
Gee, I dunno. How about the staff being uptight assholes over trivial things? How about the staff exacerbating problems by being overly aggressive?

Kind of what like I've been complaining about for a while now?
 
*kryogenix*
post Jun 27 2007, 10:51 PM
Post #915





Guest
QUOTE(brownsugar @ Jun 27 2007, 11:07 PM) *
Oh. _smile.gif I don't know if you picked it up...but that was in response to Sammi's question referring to what you said while you were on staff. Do you have anything you want to add about that?

If you are insinuating that any of that was brought up, we can just end the conversation right here. I don't another long debate about something that never happened.


Well, it's not hard to believe you're denying it happened back then if you're completely ignoring my complaints now.
 
*digitalfragrance*
post Jun 27 2007, 11:38 PM
Post #916





Guest
QUOTE(kryogenix @ Jun 27 2007, 11:51 PM) *
Well, it's not hard to believe you're denying it happened back then if you're completely ignoring my complaints now.


Sorry for jumping in on this, but I honestly don't remember any of this when you were on staff either.
 
gelionie
post Jun 28 2007, 12:14 AM
Post #917


say maydayism.
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,447
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 26,344
Me neither... ermm.gif
 
sadolakced acid
post Jun 28 2007, 01:29 AM
Post #918


dripping destruction
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,282
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 21,929
i don't remember much conflict from james back then.

he came in, did his job, didn't go apeshit with power, and quite frankly did a pretty good job.
 
*kryogenix*
post Jun 28 2007, 01:33 AM
Post #919





Guest
QUOTE(digitalfragrance @ Jun 28 2007, 12:38 AM) *
Sorry for jumping in on this, but I honestly don't remember any of this when you were on staff either.


Who are you again?


QUOTE(gelionie @ Jun 28 2007, 01:14 AM) *
Me neither... ermm.gif


Who are you again?

QUOTE(sadolakced acid @ Jun 28 2007, 02:29 AM) *
i don't remember much conflict from james back then.

he came in, did his job, didn't go apeshit with power, and quite frankly did a pretty good job.


The staff was very different back when you were still there. I believe ersatz was referring to my recent rehiring.
 
sadolakced acid
post Jun 28 2007, 02:07 AM
Post #920


dripping destruction
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,282
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 21,929
you had a recent rehiring, eh?

quite intersting.

anyways; i was reading the cB revolution thread the other day. it's quite intersting. Entertaining, really.

I doubt a similar thread would fly today. Members don't care, and even if they did moderators probably wouldn't let it go on for as long as it did.

ahh, the good old days...

I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that if what james says about mods ratcheting down on control of the forum is true, it's because they're bored. I mean, you finally make it to mod and there's nothing for you to moderate.
 
gelionie
post Jun 28 2007, 02:15 AM
Post #921


say maydayism.
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,447
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 26,344
Hmmm when was your "recent rehiring" then?...
 
*superstitious*
post Jun 28 2007, 06:36 AM
Post #922





Guest
Well, remember when James called the Staff Meeting? There was the memo and all and I remember being called "a f*cking bitch" on more than one occasion (although it was I who tarnished his perfect record, an absolutely unforgiveable act on my part). XD

sadolakced acid (I apologize, I don't know your name) - I'm not sure how long you've been back, but things are really relaxed right now, especially in The Lounge.

I can understand some of this pre-CB4, but right now it seems like the majority of staff is really lenient and understanding. Heck, I just returned from The Lounge and not even two months ago many of the still open threads would have been closed.

I think it's important to give feedback, but it's also nice to acknowledge improvement as well.

In any case, carry on. =)

QUOTE(gelionie @ Jun 28 2007, 03:15 AM) *
Hmmm when was your "recent rehiring" then?...

Early 2007, January, I believe.
 
*SayBloodyMary*
post Jun 28 2007, 07:42 AM
Post #923





Guest
Urhm, actually guys, James DID bring this up while he was on staff, it just that no one was exactly sure how serious he was at the time.

And I'm sorry, but honestly, no one IS racheting down in terms of closing/moving/deleting topics... Justin, I actually think things have got better since the Revolution.
 
*kryogenix*
post Jun 28 2007, 12:55 PM
Post #924





Guest


There are no problems. We are doing a great job. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.

QUOTE
In the topic that was referred to, he mentioned something about "lightening up". But who hasn't? I'm sure if he was 10% as vocal and serious as he is about "it" now, it would've made more sense.




First of all, me being vocal about it is irrelevant. It doesn't matter if I was vocal about it then or now. What matters is you guys did a shitty job, and you deserve to get shit for it. You guys seem to think it's my complaints that are the problem here when it is the staff's shoddy work that is the problem.

Second of all, I WAS vocal about it back then. Perhaps not as much as I am now, but back then I was giving you guys the benefit of the doubt. Now I know I can't trust you guys as far as I can throw you.

To bring this back on topic (thanks again for providing a smokescreen ersatz), you guys need to be held accountable for your actions, and I'd like to see stuff get done.
 
*ersatz*
post Jun 28 2007, 03:31 PM
Post #925





Guest
I wasn't trying to "provide a smokescreen", I was seriously honestly curious as to why I hadn't heard such vehement backlash from you before in all the time we were on staff together.
 
« Next Oldest · Feedback Resolved Topics · Next Newest »
 

47 Pages V  « < 35 36 37 38 39 > » 
Closed TopicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Display Mode: Standard · Switch to: Linear+ · Switch to: Outline

Track this topic · Email this topic · Print this topic