Muscle..., are they necessary for guys to have? |
  |
 Dec 16 2006, 10:50 PM
Post
#51
|
|
 Senior Member  Group: Posts: 8,274 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 8,001  |
QUOTE(gr8ape @ Dec 16 2006, 7:26 PM)  You fukin' FAG. Get raped or something  Wow.
|
|
|
|
| *x1227x* |
Dec 17 2006, 12:15 AM
Post
#52
|
|
Guest |
.... someone.. anyone.. please delete that picture. it just blinded the hell outta me.
|
|
|
|
| *a painefull euphoria* |
Dec 17 2006, 12:27 AM
Post
#53
|
|
Guest |
^wtf??? gross
|
|
|
|
| *x1227x* |
Dec 17 2006, 12:28 AM
Post
#54
|
|
Guest |
-sigh-
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 17 2006, 12:34 AM
Post
#55
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Member Posts: 5 Joined: Dec 2006 Member No: 488,236 |
Is there some reason my post was deleted? Anyway, here it is again.
Surely you girls jest? "Rolls when you bend over"? WTF!? What do you call six pack abs then? Studs? Also, muscles don't roll, not that you could possibly know such a thing. Most of you girls are clueless when it comes to muscle because whenever someone asks this question the first thing that pops into your mind is a bunch of 300 pound bald roid freaks with insulin bellies and more visible muscles than you can name. (Anything besides those that start "bi" and end with "ceps.") If you saw a marginally attractive 220 pound lean dude who could hold a conversation that doesn't involve supplement or lifting volume discussion you'd probably giggle your stupid heads off. Asking girls whether their men must have muscle is like asking men whether their women must like wearing make up. No one actually cares, they're just going to say, "Oh ho hum not too much etc etc." |
|
|
|
|
Dec 17 2006, 12:48 AM
Post
#56
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 844 Joined: Jan 2006 Member No: 362,677 |
ermmm. idk. my friend, he's REALLY STRONG, but for some reason his muscles don't show....
  ?
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 17 2006, 01:17 AM
Post
#57
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Member Posts: 4 Joined: Dec 2006 Member No: 488,267 |
QUOTE(ashopely @ Dec 17 2006, 12:48 AM) ermmm. idk. my friend, he's REALLY STRONG, but for some reason his muscles don't show.... ?Are you aware that strength = muscles and to be REALLY strong your 'friend' must have bulging, eye blowing, gh mutated muscles? Can he squat 2000lbs? Can he Deadlift 1500lbs? Can he benchpress 1200lbs? That would be REALLY strong |
|
|
|
|
Dec 17 2006, 01:17 AM
Post
#58
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Member Posts: 1 Joined: Dec 2006 Member No: 488,266 |
I found this thread via bodybuilding.com. I consider myself to be a bodybuiler and I was wondering, do you like my look? Not all bodybuilders are 300lbs.
  
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 17 2006, 01:23 AM
Post
#59
|
|
 chinky Group: Official Designer Posts: 2,566 Joined: Jul 2006 Member No: 434,437 |
^ Your thighs scare me
  to answer the thread, noo. muscle doesn't really matter. i don't look at a guy's body...then again i AM only 13 :P |
|
|
|
|
Dec 17 2006, 01:45 AM
Post
#60
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Member Posts: 5 Joined: Dec 2006 Member No: 488,236 |
QUOTE(ashopely @ Dec 16 2006, 9:48 PM) ermmm. idk. my friend, he's REALLY STRONG, but for some reason his muscles don't show.... ?If you must know, muscle tissue is composed of fibers in a water based medium. The more tension it undergoes over time, the more water is pumped into it and more mitochondria are produced within the cells. If there is little tension over time (for example someone doing an incredible amount of weight in a lift in an instant) then the only factor that changes is the muscle's ability to flex - more of a neurological development. In other words, your friend's muscles flex more completely for his size. Do you have any examples of your friend's strength? |
|
|
|
|
Dec 17 2006, 01:57 AM
Post
#61
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Member Posts: 4 Joined: Dec 2006 Member No: 488,238 |
I do evil things
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 17 2006, 12:11 PM
Post
#62
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Member Posts: 1 Joined: Dec 2006 Member No: 488,325 |
so what do you think of something like this? (serious)
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 17 2006, 01:41 PM
Post
#63
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Member Posts: 4 Joined: Dec 2006 Member No: 488,232 |
Looks like you have potential, kid.
|
|
|
|
| *mona lisa* |
Dec 17 2006, 08:14 PM
Post
#64
|
|
Guest |
From now on, if anyone from bodybuilding comes here to spam or post inappropriate photos, their post(s) will be deleted once viewed by a moderator. Please read our forum rules if you haven't already and follow them. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 17 2006, 09:15 PM
Post
#65
|
|
|
Member Group: Member Posts: 12 Joined: Dec 2006 Member No: 487,968 |
If you ask me.. I don`t like guys with any muscles at all.
But, the thing is.. they can`t be ugly. But, I would like them to have ENOUGH strenght to carry me.. I`m not that heavy so the issue should not be so big.. Yah. |
|
|
|
|
Dec 18 2006, 04:46 PM
Post
#66
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Member Posts: 2 Joined: Dec 2006 Member No: 488,212 |
Would you guys Gangbang with Ronnie coleman, Chuck Norris, Bruce Lee and a silverback gorilla at the same time?
Did i mention the gorilla is on cell tech |
|
|
|
|
Dec 18 2006, 09:04 PM
Post
#67
|
|
 <-[RaWR]-> Group: Member Posts: 180 Joined: Feb 2005 Member No: 102,133 |
i live for the cut right above the hip bones. RawR i luv it
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 18 2006, 09:05 PM
Post
#68
|
|
 You can't keep running from what you're trying to find. Group: Official Member Posts: 5,030 Joined: Oct 2004 Member No: 54,096 |
A lot muscles is SO gross
 except for like, on matthew mcconaughey lol.I personally like skinny to slightly muscly guys. So like, from Tyson Ritter to Hayden Christensen. Super skinny guys usually aren't attractive either though. |
|
|
|
|
Dec 19 2006, 10:20 PM
Post
#69
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Member Posts: 1 Joined: Dec 2006 Member No: 488,884 |
don't take this the wrong way, but stop saying a lot of muscles. it's agitating.
you don't create new muscles working out, you make the ones you have larger. things like "a lot muscles is SO gross" doesn't make any sense. you yourself (angel revelation) have a lot of muscles in your body, so you're in essence calling yourself and every human alive "gross." just a note: honestly, i don't have a problem with any of your opinions. i just wanted to add my comment. carry on. |
|
|
|
|
Dec 19 2006, 10:48 PM
Post
#70
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Member Posts: 2 Joined: Dec 2006 Member No: 488,894 |
....
|
|
|
|
| *suddenly she* |
Dec 20 2006, 06:32 PM
Post
#71
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(eiker_ir @ Dec 17 2006, 1:11 PM) so what do you think of something like this? (serious) http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y213/Sikb...lassmuncher.jpg what the dickens? maybe if he straightened his back and looked a tiny bit more intelligent, yeah, it's okay, i suppose? whoever posted up there with the godzilla-type thighs, that (as in the whole body in general) is freaky. i'm sure some people do find it attractive, though. yes, muscle is important. i don't want to be with a guy who has less muscle mass than i do... |
|
|
|
| *Infinite.* |
Dec 20 2006, 06:58 PM
Post
#72
|
|
Guest |
-shrugs- I don't see it as a big deal, I don't like guys that have a ton of muscle though, I guess I just like them to be somewhat in the normal category.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 20 2006, 07:45 PM
Post
#73
|
|
 Member Group: Member Posts: 24 Joined: Dec 2006 Member No: 489,070 |
personally,I think scrawny boys are cute. when they're too buff they sort of look like they're too into themselves. and that's stereotyping,but it's what it looks like. and it makes it unattractive. but whatever. really it's only my opinion. =] |
|
|
|
|
Dec 20 2006, 08:15 PM
Post
#74
|
|
 ALLISON Group: Official Designer Posts: 3,372 Joined: Nov 2005 Member No: 310,259 |
i dont like hunky guys
they annoy me for some reason haha..shrimpy guys are alright for me but i'd prefer "medium" guys 
|
|
|
|
|
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: