Clear? |
![]() ![]() |
Clear? |
Nov 28 2006, 03:33 PM
Post
#26
|
|
![]() R U A Q T ? [; ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 7,276 Joined: Jun 2006 Member No: 421,631 |
|
|
|
|
Nov 28 2006, 05:37 PM
Post
#27
|
|
![]() The more things change,The more they stay the same. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 1,319 Joined: Jul 2006 Member No: 442,600 |
Good Question,Umm I would sat something that is colorless.
|
|
|
|
Nov 28 2006, 08:31 PM
Post
#28
|
|
![]() in a matter of time ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,151 Joined: Aug 2005 Member No: 191,357 |
"Clear" is more like a description of opacity. There's "clear", "opaque" and "solid". You can have clear, opaque and solid things in any hue and colour possible.
So if you were describing colour AND opacity, you should really say "clear and colourless". But like I said, they should really just call it "top coat", and cut the colour crap. |
|
|
|
Nov 28 2006, 11:22 PM
Post
#29
|
|
![]() Death is a promise given to us at birth ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Designer Posts: 4,757 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 7,459 |
that what i said too.
|
|
|
|
| *x1227x* |
Nov 28 2006, 11:31 PM
Post
#30
|
|
Guest |
i agree with gigiopolis.
its more of a description of opacity, but everyone has their opinions. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |