Log In · Register

 

Debate Rules

Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.

Debate.

I'm 10, I killed you, what should happen to me?
*NatiMarie*
post Jun 2 2004, 08:38 PM
Post #1





Guest






I had this in the death penalty question, but I think it's a different issue. What if they were younger than 12 or something and they committed a crime of this extent. What should be done to them?

Okay, what's I'm talking about...I should have specified, sorry is the Jamie Bulgar case.

The story is a three year old was brutally tortured and murdered by one 9-year old boy and a 10-year old boy. He was abducted and by a course of hours, died a terrible death. What should have happened to these boys?

Years later, at the age of 18 they were released from prison. Is that a suitable penalty?

EDIT//--from a website
Here's brief summary:
On February 12, 1993 a small boy who was to turn three in March was taken from a shopping mall in Liverpool by two 10 year old boys. Jamie Bulger walked away from his mother for only a second and Jon Venables took his hand and led him out of the mall with his friend Robert Thompson. They took Jamie on a walk for over 2 and a half miles, along the way stopping every now and again to torture the poor little boy who was crying constantly for his mommy. Finally they stopped at a railway track where they brutally kicked him, threw stones at him, rubbed paint in his eyes and pushed batteries up his anus.

It was actually worse than this. What these two boys did was so horrendous that Jamie's mother was forbidden to identify his body. They then left his beaten small body on the tracks so a train could run him over to hide the mess they had created. These two boys, even being boys understood what they did was wrong, hence trying to make it look like an accident. This week Lady Justice Butler-Sloss has awarded the two boys anonymity for the rest of their lives when they leave custody with new identities. We cannot let this happen. They will also leave early this year only serving just over half of their sentence. One paper even stated that Robert may go on to University. They are getting away with their crime. They need to pay, and we have to do something to make them pay for their horrific crime. They took Jamie's life violently away, and in return they get a new life.
 
3 Pages V  < 1 2 3 >  
Start new topic
Replies (25 - 49)
onenonly101
post Jun 3 2004, 02:33 PM
Post #26


i'm too cool 4 school
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 752
Joined: Mar 2004
Member No: 7,421



QUOTE
hes right. who knows if the child is really dumb or has a genius potential? you guys are making statements based on:

theres 2 kids, 9 and 10 years old, who killed a 3 year old.

wow. thats a LOT of insight. just because they were psychologically evaluated doesnt mean that they might not have something theyre hiding in their minds or something. youd have to befriend them and see how they really think.

murderers are different than any other kid. you cant just treat them as if they think and do the same things as other 9 and 10 year olds.


^not enough credit to kids again. Yeah murders are more complex than ayother kids, and what these children did in this case was VERY weel thought out, so based on that they should be treated as any other murder.


Side note: Half are saying no don't punish them with jail time. You say that now, but when YOU are put in that situation you might/will think differently
 
waccoon
post Jun 3 2004, 06:36 PM
Post #27


We are the cure.
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 4,936
Joined: Jan 2004
Member No: 1,456



QUOTE(onenonly101 @ Jun 3 2004, 3:33 PM)
^not enough credit to kids again. Yeah murders are more complex than ayother kids, and what these children did in this case was VERY weel thought out, so based on that they should be treated as any other murder.


Side note: Half are saying no don't punish them with jail time. You say that now, but when YOU are put in that situation you might/will think differently

must i repeat myself again?

every child is different. your theory may be true for the majority, but we have no idea in this case.
 
*NatiMarie*
post Jun 3 2004, 08:23 PM
Post #28





Guest






QUOTE(stryker76 @ Jun 3 2004, 2:08 AM)
No offense but how can you be sure that they found pleasure in it....how do you kno there wasnt someone else....there are only possible 4 people tht would kno....the kid killed, the boys, and the other person if there......but i cant believe that 2 boys that are 9 and 10 are capable of feeling or knowing what they where doin to the kid....my brother is 9 years old and he would never be able to nething like that unless guided to do so by someone else......there has to be more to this some where...

Sorry I didn't approach this sooner. There was a video camera footage showing the two little boys taking little Jamie Bulgar. The whole story is, so his mom was at the ball, she let go of his hand, turned around for a couple of seconds I think, then her little boy was gone. So as she was searching for him, the mall camera showed the two little boys taking him away. There were many witness accounts and it was only the little boy with the two older boys. So that's why I think there's something fishy about that. The boys obviously knew what they were doing. I should really find a link to this case...*searches on yahoo* -->but I must finish my hw... ermm.gif
 
Mireh
post Jun 3 2004, 08:36 PM
Post #29


original member.
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 4,825
Joined: Jan 2004
Member No: 1,460



QUOTE
pushed batteries up his anus


Wtf??

Omg...NO NO NO! Keep them in prision! I would not consider 9 and 10 year olds ingnorant about death and torture.
 
NostalgicRockChi...
post Jun 3 2004, 09:32 PM
Post #30


Senior Member
****

Group: Member
Posts: 122
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,137



If it was on purpose then the kid should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. You commit a crime, you pay for it. Simple as that. I think if you are clever enough at a young age to plan out a murder and actually go through with it, then you are old enough to be punished just like anyone else. Plus, I think it would be an injustice to the family of the victim to see this kid get out of jail a few years later and life his/her life normally when their own son or daughter no longer has that privilege because they are dead.
 
Yemmerz
post Jun 4 2004, 04:08 PM
Post #31


old school member
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,796
Joined: Jan 2004
Member No: 843



you know what. if it was someone who was like 5...well that kid needs to go to the doctor. but...i mean 10..you know whats right and whats wrong. they deserve full punishment.
 
ComradeRed
post Jun 4 2004, 05:25 PM
Post #32


Dark Lord of McCandless
******

Group: Member
Posts: 2,226
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,761



QUOTE(onenonly101 @ Jun 3 2004, 2:33 PM)
^not enough credit to kids again. Yeah murders are more complex than ayother kids, and what these children did in this case was VERY weel thought out, so based on that they should be treated as any other murder.


Side note: Half are saying no don't punish them with jail time. You say that now, but when YOU are put in that situation you might/will think differently

I still think we should burn them at the stake, praise Allah.
 
wantingtobehis
post Jun 4 2004, 10:21 PM
Post #33


Newbie
*

Group: Member
Posts: 9
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 20,137



No, I think they...and their parents should go to jail. At ten they should know right from wrong enough to know killing is wrong, and if they don't they would then.
 
ryfitaDF
post Jun 5 2004, 12:37 AM
Post #34


LunchboxXx
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,789
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,810



if i were killed by a 10 year old i'd be so embarassed i'd just shut u about it.
 
*krnxswat*
post Jun 5 2004, 12:39 AM
Post #35





Guest






QUOTE(ryfitaDF @ Jun 5 2004, 1:37 AM)
if i were killed by a 10 year old i'd be so embarassed i'd just shut u about it.

You'd be dead.
 
ryfitaDF
post Jun 5 2004, 12:42 AM
Post #36


LunchboxXx
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,789
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,810



QUOTE(krnxswat @ Jun 5 2004, 12:39 AM)
You'd be dead.

yea i would. if i were killed by a 10 year old i wou;dn't be able to care.

nice catch!
 
ichiban
post Jun 5 2004, 01:08 AM
Post #37


ilikeyouSofreakingmuch.
******

Group: Member
Posts: 2,014
Joined: Jan 2004
Member No: 643



really, it all depends on the situation ...

the storyis so sad though
 
m@dcow
post Jun 5 2004, 06:38 AM
Post #38


teach me korean... i'm serious
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 918
Joined: Mar 2004
Member No: 8,427



i think if the boys are aware of what they did... and if they killed mass numbers of people, and if what they did was so horribly wrong no one felt sorry for them... then they should get the death penalty
 
mechwarrior1989
post Jun 5 2004, 07:47 AM
Post #39


The red or the blue
****

Group: Member
Posts: 294
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 19,976



I believe they need to serve out the rest of their sentence, 9 and 10 year olds are always aware of what they're doing, especially if it is something like murder. Plus they probably were watching a lot of TV which would help them to plot it. And also with two boys, you never know what kind of ideas they can formulate amoungst themselves. Had they been a bit smarter, they would have tried dodging the cameras in the mall, but I wouldn't expect that from them for another year. But yea, when I was 9 and 10 I used to plan out robberies in my head. Same thing, jsut I never acted on it.
 
hybrid
post Jun 5 2004, 08:06 AM
Post #40


pixel hybrid
*******

Group: Member
Posts: 6,410
Joined: Jan 2004
Member No: 1,081



Its their responsibility of taken the life of another person. Teach them how death feels like. Burn them or eletricute them or something. _dry.gif
 
m@dcow
post Jun 5 2004, 09:00 AM
Post #41


teach me korean... i'm serious
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 918
Joined: Mar 2004
Member No: 8,427



lethal injection!... why do they starlize needles for lethal injection?
 
*Kathleen*
post Jun 5 2004, 02:01 PM
Post #42





Guest






QUOTE
No, I think they...and their parents should go to jail. At ten they should know right from wrong enough to know killing is wrong, and if they don't they would then.

Um...most of the time, parents don't know what their kids are doing these days. A lot of them are disconnected from them, and it seems as if the media is playing the parental figure these days... You can't automatically blame the parent. Even if parents tell kids to not drink and drive, they still do it.

QUOTE
why do they starlize needles for lethal injection?

That's a good question. *Strokes chin* Hmm...
 
hybrid
post Jun 5 2004, 02:03 PM
Post #43


pixel hybrid
*******

Group: Member
Posts: 6,410
Joined: Jan 2004
Member No: 1,081



QUOTE(Kathleen @ Jun 5 2004, 3:01 PM)
Um...most of the time, parents don't know what their kids are doing these days. A lot of them are disconnected from them, and it seems as if the media is playing the parental figure these days... You can't automatically blame the parent. Even if parents tell kids to not drink and drive, they still do it.


That's a good question. *Strokes chin* Hmm...

I agree. The media now plays as a parent. But still, Killing isn't cool. Maybe, if the media just got that message through kids. _dry.gif
 
ComradeRed
post Jun 5 2004, 02:06 PM
Post #44


Dark Lord of McCandless
******

Group: Member
Posts: 2,226
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,761



Unless you're killing Russians, then it's okay.
 
onenonly101
post Jun 8 2004, 04:09 PM
Post #45


i'm too cool 4 school
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 752
Joined: Mar 2004
Member No: 7,421



QUOTE
You can't automatically blame the parent. Even if parents tell kids to not drink and drive, they still do it.


Agreed. There is a point where you can't blame the parent anymore and the child has the responsibility. Thoguh it needs to be the parents responsibility to know the child is doingesp at a young age like that now when they become teens they like to get buck and think they can control their life and just lie to their parents., but the parents shouldn't jjust take the surface answerr of no i'm not doing anything
 
ComradeRed
post Jun 8 2004, 04:18 PM
Post #46


Dark Lord of McCandless
******

Group: Member
Posts: 2,226
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,761



QUOTE(TBoltzbabe @ Jun 3 2004, 9:35 AM)
but if you killed my boyfriend i'd say you should be released... and then i'd find you and torture you for a month and then finally kill you as slowly as possible... probably by way of cutting off meat from your thighs, cooking it with seasoning, and then forcing you to eat yourself alive until you bleed to death.

Haha a little overprotective there?
 
jue
post May 7 2005, 10:34 PM
Post #47


Senior Member
******

Group: Member
Posts: 2,881
Joined: Apr 2005
Member No: 132,134



juvy
 
banthisaccountno...
post May 7 2005, 10:36 PM
Post #48


Senior Member
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,732
Joined: Mar 2005
Member No: 119,327



^damn, you like bringing back old topics, huh? tongue.gif

juvi*
 
rOckThISshYt
post May 7 2005, 11:00 PM
Post #49


Live Your Own Party
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,261
Joined: Mar 2004
Member No: 7,489



Jesus.. I don't care how old you are. They knew what they were doing. They should spend a hell of a lot more time in jail than eight years!!
 
sweet_devil
post May 8 2005, 12:45 AM
Post #50


Senior Member
****

Group: Member
Posts: 121
Joined: May 2005
Member No: 134,309



Wasn't what the boys did like blamed on the movie "Chucky"? Anyways, I heard that the baby was sitting in his babies trolley in a supermarket and that the two boys took him, painted him blue, beat him and then put him on the railroad tracks. I think the boys should definitely not been released into the public. They should and hopefully did have serious conselling in prison.
 

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: