Moderator Changes, V.II |
  |
| *This Confession* |
 Sep 24 2006, 02:25 PM
Post
#51
|
|
Guest  |
Okay so everyone being treated equally. So if people were to do that then they would treat every mod like they were Kathleen, since Kathleen is so well liked around here and everyone seems to trust her decision?
Editted back since he responded to the post. 
|
|
|
|
| *I Shot JFK* |
Sep 24 2006, 02:28 PM
Post
#52
|
|
Guest |
^actually, i think if we were to go with an 'all people being treated equally' approach, then the mos tlikely outcome would be more questioning of people lik ekathleen, not more trust in the mods overall.
but why on earth would i treat all the mods equally if they arent equally good at their jobs? benefit of the doubt only lasts so long before 'useless' is fair. --- o. you editted your post away. poo on you. |
|
|
|
| *Zatanna* |
Sep 24 2006, 02:31 PM
Post
#53
|
|
Guest |
Ok, back to the moderator changes and since no one responded to what I believe was the point :
QUOTE(Azarel @ Sep 21 2006, 12:07 AM)  Hardly even noticable, but uhh.. moorepocket -> moorepocket* < anal retentive. Yep, he had a name change. I know it's a tiny one, but it still should have been mentioned here. |
|
|
|
| *Statues/Shadows* |
Sep 24 2006, 02:54 PM
Post
#54
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(iRock cB @ Sep 24 2006, 3:23 PM) To add to that, I talked to Kathleen about it on the phone the night it happened and she knew what she was getting into and she seemed fine with being demoted. She admitted to doing it so others wouldn't get punished for her wrong doing. She knew that she would get demoted and even so she still admitted it, which is honorable to say the least. Kathleen has a good head on her shoulders and I believe she's at peace with the decision. I know if Kathleen was an admin, she would have to do the same thing to anyone else who broke the same rule. I remember when she and I discussed how everyone should be treated equally. With that being said, I think she knows it was the right decision. Other people getting in trouble would not be an issue if certain people were rational in the first place. |
|
|
|
| *mona lisa* |
Sep 26 2006, 08:54 PM
Post
#55
|
|
Guest |
This Confession's username has been changed to Infinite.
|
|
|
|
| *Kathleen* |
Sep 28 2006, 08:22 AM
Post
#56
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(iRock cB @ Sep 24 2006, 3:23 PM) To add to that, I talked to Kathleen about it on the phone the night it happened and she knew what she was getting into and she seemed fine with being demoted. She admitted to doing it so others wouldn't get punished for her wrong doing. She knew that she would get demoted and even so she still admitted it, which is honorable to say the least. Kathleen has a good head on her shoulders and I believe she's at peace with the decision. I know if Kathleen was an admin, she would have to do the same thing to anyone else who broke the same rule. I remember when she and I discussed how everyone should be treated equally. With that being said, I think she knows it was the right decision. Uhh. I agree with everything else except the bolded. I can honestly say that I wouldn't have done the same thing in that position (due to the issue at hand). I would demote a moderator if they were blatantly spamming and abusing their powers and/or were inactive (in fact, I checked the admin CP everyday to see what moderators were actually performing moderator actions). Note Nicki's post: QUOTE(Statues/Shadows @ Sep 24 2006, 3:54 PM) Other people getting in trouble would not be an issue if certain people were rational in the first place. Breaking a rule against Staff members is entirely different than breaking a rule against the Community. [/two cents] Hi guys. 
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 28 2006, 07:05 PM
Post
#57
|
|
 Senior Member  Group: Posts: 8,274 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 8,001 |
Kathleen ...
|
|
|
|
| *afflict.x* |
Oct 1 2006, 12:59 PM
Post
#58
|
|
Guest |
Just my opinion. Admins, if you're considering hiring one or two persons, tina would be great for people staff.
|
|
|
|
| *I Shot JFK* |
Oct 1 2006, 03:48 PM
Post
#59
|
|
Guest |
^ ok... hasn't that post happened before?
or am i just like, having weird mistaken deja vu? |
|
|
|
| *afflict.x* |
Oct 1 2006, 07:45 PM
Post
#60
|
|
Guest |
no, it's just been mentioned so many times.
|
|
|
|
| *mona lisa* |
Oct 8 2006, 03:25 PM
Post
#61
|
|
Guest |
Radhika (rawtheekuh.) has stepped down from her People Staff position.
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 8 2006, 03:25 PM
Post
#62
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Official Member Posts: 7,149 Joined: Aug 2005 Member No: 213,509 |
OMG WHAT. OMGOGMGMOGM RADHIKA. OMG. noooo. she will be truely missed
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 8 2006, 03:26 PM
Post
#63
|
|
 Pocketful of Sunshine Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 8,690 Joined: Nov 2005 Member No: 289,004 |
QUOTE(afflict.x @ Oct 1 2006, 5:45 PM) no, it's just been mentioned so many times. I should just like.. start counting the number of times people mention that from now on.  RAD. BOO.
|
|
|
|
| *Libertie* |
Oct 8 2006, 03:52 PM
Post
#64
|
|
Guest |
Radhika, you were one of my top choices this last hiring session. It's too bad that you didn't have time for it.. Let's hope next time when things calm down you can apply and join us again.
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 8 2006, 03:59 PM
Post
#65
|
|
 oooh yeah. Group: Member Posts: 1,333 Joined: Feb 2006 Member No: 376,533 |
Thanks for hiring me last session, guys! I hope I have time later, too. Being on staff was great while it lasted. Take care! I'll be around, so watch for me.
|
|
|
|
| *StanleyThePanda* |
Oct 9 2006, 01:09 AM
Post
#66
|
|
Guest |
^ I will deffinately be watching for you.
I hope everything in your life works out, we will miss you!
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 9 2006, 02:06 AM
Post
#67
|
|
 Yawn Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 9,530 Joined: Nov 2004 Member No: 65,772 |
Yes, you will be missed =(
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 9 2006, 07:45 AM
Post
#68
|
|
 say maydayism. Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,447 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 26,344 |
Radhika...
Although I don't know you well, you seemed to do a great job while you were still on staff (I wans't too active then so I'm in no place to judge). Hope everything is fine for you. :) |
|
|
|
| *Zatanna* |
Oct 9 2006, 08:53 AM
Post
#69
|
|
Guest |
Hey Radhika -
I hope you find more time in the future as well. It's hard to make decisions like these and you were mature enough to know and honest enough to step down when you knew you couldn't juggle everything. :) Good luck with school and I look forward to (hopefully) seeing you back on staff one day if you should choose to reapply. :) |
|
|
|
| *Pl-dot-lS* |
Oct 9 2006, 09:03 AM
Post
#70
|
|
Guest |
There goes a good one >.O
|
|
|
|
| *I Shot JFK* |
Oct 9 2006, 12:32 PM
Post
#71
|
|
Guest |
shame! i had high hopes for this one...
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 9 2006, 09:01 PM
Post
#72
|
|
|
oooh yeah. Group: Member Posts: 1,333 Joined: Feb 2006 Member No: 376,533 |
Thanks, guys. Aaah, I'm fucking swamped with homework right now, f'real.
I shouldn't even be on. Oh well, the library is open early tomorrow, and I'm taking advantage. To top it all off, I have a MUN position paper due Fri, tech rehersals everyday this week, the opening night of a play on Fri, and an information night from a school I'm applying to on Thurs.Yeah, it's not exactly easy to work in cB on those circumstances. *prays even though i'm an atheist* |
|
|
|
|
Oct 9 2006, 09:19 PM
Post
#73
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Official Member Posts: 3,459 Joined: Dec 2005 Member No: 328,021 |
RADHIKAAAAAAAA
 Come back soon, dear. 
|
|
|
|
| *Infinite.* |
Oct 9 2006, 10:15 PM
Post
#74
|
|
Guest |
Ah I thought something was different
Hope you come back eventually
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 27 2006, 02:09 PM
Post
#75
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 721 Joined: Aug 2006 Member No: 447,101 |
So, I just read the entire topic and wow, THIS IS THE INTERNET PEOPLE. It's like some of you have got no lives whatsoever. As much as I love Kathleen, she did break a rule, get over it. Most of you are taking it WAY too serious than Kathleen herself.
I honestly do not know your (James) history with Mona but calling her useless is a little extreme. I'm late, I know. Having a life sucks sometimes. |
|
|
|
|
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: