new iPod Nano G2, very ugly |
![]() ![]() |
new iPod Nano G2, very ugly |
Sep 12 2006, 04:41 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 15 Joined: Sep 2006 Member No: 460,435 |
A thinner design. Five stylish colors. A brighter display. Up to 24 hours of battery life. Just about the only thing that hasn’t changed is the name. In 2GB, 4GB, and 8GB models starting at $149, iPod nano puts up to 2,000 songs in your pocket.(1) QUOTE The New Nano, with 8GB, is $249. fair enough. I don't understand how the 30GB regular ipod is also $249 in my opinion: its so ugly. i want to old shiny black and white back [edit] didn't see this but, the ipod video 5.5G is out, 80 gigs now [link] New ipod shuffle 2G
|
|
|
|
Sep 12 2006, 04:45 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 3,264 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 761 |
It looks like.. the iPod mini. Except wayy smaller.
I would want it.. My 2GB iPod Nano doesn't even have enough space to store my top 400 songs, let alone the other 1,600. And it has 24 hour battery life too. That'd be useful for plane rides. It's not that ugly. It's ok looking. Nevermind.. It was at the Apple Store.. IT COMES IN LIME GREEN NOWWW! That's awesome. I wish they'd make one in orange. =/ The new iPod shuffle looks cool too. I WANT TO TRADE IN MINE FOR A GREEN 4GB ONE! But it doesn't fit into any of the old cases anymore, right? |
|
|
|
Sep 12 2006, 05:18 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() the bird and the bee sides! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 1,697 Joined: Aug 2005 Member No: 201,280 |
Yeah, when I first saw it, I was like ... iPod mini ... but obviously smaller and thinner. I don't think it's THAT much different than the original Nano. I dunno.
|
|
|
|
Sep 12 2006, 05:23 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 3,264 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 761 |
^ ITS AWESOMER THAN THE ORIGINAL IPOD NANO THOUGH!
It gets 24 hour battery life and it comes in different colors. And it costs less now. My iPod is more colorful (the case), but I want it for the battery life and the storage space. It's hard going on a 12 hour flight without music.. My iPod goes like 6 hours and it dies =/ The new one has 24 hour battery life, so that'd be enough to last a whole flight. |
|
|
|
Sep 12 2006, 07:34 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
CB's Forum Troll ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 926 Joined: Mar 2005 Member No: 115,142 |
oh please, those things are getting way to small, eventually people will just lose them rofl
|
|
|
|
Sep 12 2006, 07:54 PM
Post
#6
|
|
![]() the bird and the bee sides! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 1,697 Joined: Aug 2005 Member No: 201,280 |
QUOTE ^ ITS AWESOMER THAN THE ORIGINAL IPOD NANO THOUGH! Yeah, I like the color selection. (= And it's nice that they lowered the price a bit. |
|
|
|
| *WHIMSICAL 0NE* |
Sep 12 2006, 08:15 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Guest |
They've deff. improved all the iPods.
I had one of like the very first ones. I eventually gave it to my brother and now I have one of the last just music, no color iPods. I really like it. |
|
|
|
| *salcha4u* |
Sep 12 2006, 09:28 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Guest |
|
|
|
|
Sep 13 2006, 03:11 PM
Post
#9
|
|
![]() cheeeesy like theres no tomorrow ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 3,316 Joined: Aug 2004 Member No: 37,142 |
so mad lol. its alright though i knew they were coming out with something new later on. imma stick with my old nano its still good even though the battery sucks like ass.
how much thinner is it than the old one, imma look it up but i doubt it cant be that much thinner. iguess they learned from their previous mistakes a little cause the battery life is supposedly longer. but the shuffle is slightly attractive. looks oddish. but we. |
|
|
|
Sep 13 2006, 04:00 PM
Post
#10
|
|
|
. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 3,264 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 761 |
^ The old iPod nano was 1.6 x 3.5 x 0.27 inches.
The new one is 1.6 x 3.5 x 0.26 inches. They also made the new one because of all those complaints about scratching. |
|
|
|
Sep 13 2006, 06:02 PM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 15 Joined: Sep 2006 Member No: 460,435 |
|
|
|
|
Sep 13 2006, 07:11 PM
Post
#12
|
|
![]() cheeeesy like theres no tomorrow ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 3,316 Joined: Aug 2004 Member No: 37,142 |
yea i also perfer the glossy original ones, only if they were less scratch resistant and came in another colors.
|
|
|
|
Sep 13 2006, 07:13 PM
Post
#13
|
|
![]() Sup. I'm Deb =] ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Human Posts: 650 Joined: Dec 2004 Member No: 68,227 |
I'm seriously thinking about just getting this one. A 1GB used to be the same price as a 2GB. Love the price and battery life.
My regular nano only lasted like...4-6 hours if I played it nonstop. I wish it came in black though. |
|
|
|
| *RiC3xBoy* |
Sep 13 2006, 07:27 PM
Post
#14
|
|
Guest |
Man wtf? I can eat that shuffle without chewing.
|
|
|
|
Sep 14 2006, 07:54 AM
Post
#15
|
|
![]() Death is a promise given to us at birth ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Designer Posts: 4,757 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 7,459 |
i love this one. I wish i hadn't bought the white one.
|
|
|
|
Sep 14 2006, 08:37 AM
Post
#16
|
|
![]() cB Assassin ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 10,147 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 7,672 |
I actually prefer this one over the original nano, the shine on the original nano shows a lot of smudge marks, although on this new one, since' it's not shiny anymore, there would be no more smudge marks.
|
|
|
|
Sep 14 2006, 01:46 PM
Post
#17
|
|
![]() cheeeesy like theres no tomorrow ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 3,316 Joined: Aug 2004 Member No: 37,142 |
^ yea same here, but the gloss part is still purdee, But imma wait for a little bit who knows they might come out with another ipod video. lol not that i need it. but they definately will come out with something new.
|
|
|
|
| *StanleyThePanda* |
Sep 14 2006, 01:52 PM
Post
#18
|
|
Guest |
Its not ugly.. The shuffle is.
I would never get a Nano though, because I would have too many songs. |
|
|
|
Sep 14 2006, 02:07 PM
Post
#19
|
|
![]() recycle, please. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 147 Joined: Apr 2006 Member No: 393,476 |
mm. i think the shuffle is a little unattractive.
but the nano looks cool. i still am in love with my mini, though. |
|
|
|
Sep 14 2006, 02:18 PM
Post
#20
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 7,149 Joined: Aug 2005 Member No: 213,509 |
hmm it looks like the refular ipods but thiner and all
ive seen an ipod shuffle thats like 1inch by 1 inch by 1inch IM NOTLYING. it was on mtv and i saw it in targets |
|
|
|
Sep 14 2006, 04:16 PM
Post
#21
|
|
|
. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 3,264 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 761 |
^ A cube iPod?
I just found out that it comes with the new earbuds too. ![]() I don't like how they look. But then again, I don't like iPod earbuds at all. |
|
|
|
Sep 15 2006, 06:59 PM
Post
#22
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 337 Joined: Aug 2006 Member No: 457,106 |
i like the first gen nanos. i don't like the curved sides. it does look like a nano-sized mini.
the shuffle is cool, though. it's the smallest mp3 player out right now. 80 gig ipod? that's more than my computer holds!!! |
|
|
|
| *WHIMSICAL 0NE* |
Sep 15 2006, 08:54 PM
Post
#23
|
|
Guest |
I want a new iPod!
I think I'm going to get a new car first. |
|
|
|
Sep 15 2006, 09:14 PM
Post
#24
|
|
|
. ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 25 Joined: May 2006 Member No: 402,280 |
I might be forced to buy the new high-capacity iPod(The 80GB). My 30GB Creative NOMAD Jukebox Zen Xtra just ran out of space the other day(It didn't actually run out, I still have a whopping 6MB left). I've read about replacing the hard disk in it, but to open it up you need a Phillips screwdriver smaller than size 0, and I honestly don't have a clue where to find one. (Well I have a clue, I suppose)
When I first bought my MP3 player my only restriction on what I could buy was that it couldn't be an iPod. But since Creative no longer offers a comparable player with the capacity I'm looking for, I've been backed into a corner. Not even Microsoft's competing product, the Zune, which hasn't been released, will satisfy my needs. As far as the new Nano, it simply looks like they took the old iPod mini and shrunk it. I think they'll become more popular due to the colors available, but I'm never good at predicting market trends. I was among the group with thought that the iPod shuffle was a huge blunder when it was released. Clearly, I was wrong. |
|
|
|
Sep 16 2006, 09:56 PM
Post
#25
|
|
![]() Good Cow. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 180 Joined: Aug 2006 Member No: 449,486 |
hmm it looks like the refular ipods but thiner and all ive seen an ipod shuffle thats like 1inch by 1 inch by 1inch IM NOTLYING. it was on mtv and i saw it in targets Thats not an iPod shuffle, thats a MobiBlu DAH-1500. Or at least thats what I suspect you saw. There was never a version of the iPod shuffle in a cube form. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |